- Dec 29, 2008
- 19,673
- 4,730
- 280
- Thread starter
- #41
Doable, but easy?All Trump needs to do is keep what he has and win only one more of these 5 states...Co., NH, PA, VA, or Wi. That should be easy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Doable, but easy?All Trump needs to do is keep what he has and win only one more of these 5 states...Co., NH, PA, VA, or Wi. That should be easy.
The more she campaigns the worse she looks
The first debate is a big one. If Trump can look more controlled than Hillary,......
He has been better since Roger ailes was hired
I've heard this assertion from others in recent days. I've never heard the reasoning behind it.
Trump has been alot more controlled in what he has said. He hasn't looked totally crazy since ailes was hired. At least that's what I've noticed. Don't know behind the scene stuff.
Or Colorado, which is very close, or Wisconsin or New Hampshire which would throw the election into the House of Representatives with a Republican majority.
Both belong to Ms. Clinton.
CO does not belong to Mrs. Clinton.
Lying again.
Real Clear has it as a toss up. She has a "lead" but it isn't a great deal. What's more funny is that there appears to be almost 20% undecided.
Did your book of fairy tales get an ISBN number ?
There are, relatively few Trump supporters. Those who are his enablers are, I'll grant you, finatical; in the same way a 4 year old insists on eating Halloween Candy prior to getting home. There are no intellecual supporters of Mr. Trump who study his proposals and look at them up close and decide, "hey that's a hell of a plan". More often the response is that of Mitch McConnell: "Its obvious he doesn't know much about the issues." And that is a Republican saying that.Almost nothing belongs to Clinton. If the debates are a draw, Trump will win with at least 274 electoral votes. If he wins he debates, he will win with over 300 votes. For Hillary to win the election, she has to soundly defeat Trump in the debates, and she has never soundly defeated anyone in debates.Or Colorado, which is very close, or Wisconsin or New Hampshire which would throw the election into the House of Representatives with a Republican majority.Or Michigan.......
Both belong to Ms. Clinton.
Nice dissertation. Now, only if it were remotely true. You’re incredibly stupid and not just about politics.
Here are the facts. There may be 3-5% of voters who are truly undecided; totally up for grabs. The pollsters will tell you it is between 10 and 15% but that is a safe number that has been disproven over the last 4 contests. The 10% difference is those who lean one way or the other. So just consider them a push; 5% to each side. With 3-5% as the real target audience, there is little chance you’re going to sweep them as well. If you’re a truly undecided, you’re going to hear stuff you like for 90 minutes and stuff you don’t like for 90 minutes. Won’t matter. Vice-versa; if you’re leaning one way or the other, you’re not likely to be turned around unless there is some theatrics which there won’t be.
Your mind is made up by seeing saturation commercials that get more and more poignant up to election day.
Here is the kicker. The 3-5% are not all in battleground states. So your audience is likely somewhere in the neighborhood of 20-30 thousand people in Hamilton County, OH; 5,000 voters in Osceola County, about that many in neighboring Seminole-Orange County, and the largest prize of all for Clinton, Clark County and the burbs of Las Vegas.
I get it, you've never quite figured out what the word, fact, means. The facts are these, while Trump supporters are for the most part quite enthusiastic about Trump, relatively few Clinton supporters are enthusiastic about Clinton
he he he...thanks for another reason to laugh. Mr.Trump is nothing but slogans.When they see the two together, many will see they have been had by Clinton, and either switch to Trump because they will see Trump has proposals how to deal with issues they care about and Clinton has nothing but slogans and slanders about Trump to offer them or they will vote for neither of them.
So 25% is undecided. That means what...the poling is even so that would be 37.5 to 37.5. Show me any poll that reads 37.5 to 37.5...or one that is even close to those numbers. Oh wait, let me guess, the MSM is not publishing those numbers...right?Most of Trump's support is very firm, but little of Clinton's support is firm, it's not 3% to 5% or even 10% or 15% who are undecided by more like 25% since few of her supporters are committed to her because hey like or even know her policies.
Or Colorado, which is very close, or Wisconsin or New Hampshire which would throw the election into the House of Representatives with a Republican majority.
Both belong to Ms. Clinton.
CO does not belong to Mrs. Clinton.
Lying again.
Real Clear has it as a toss up. She has a "lead" but it isn't a great deal. What's more funny is that there appears to be almost 20% undecided.
Did your book of fairy tales get an ISBN number ?
Again.
RCP and I are not in the same business. They are a credible website that publishes data impartially. I am a supporter of Ms. Clinton. She is well up in Colorado that has gone blue in the last 2 elections, elected a Democrat Governor and has a large Hispanic population. Looks good for Ms. Clinton; not so good for your messiah.
What are you saying? CO2? A bag? Don't watch this debate alone.Or Colorado, which is very close, or Wisconsin or New Hampshire which would throw the election into the House of Representatives with a Republican majority.Or Michigan.......
Both belong to Ms. Clinton.
CO does not belong to Mrs. Clinton.
Lying again.
Real Clear has it as a toss up. She has a "lead" but it isn't a great deal. What's more funny is that there appears to be almost 20% undecided.
Did your book of fairy tales get an ISBN number ?
Again.
RCP and I are not in the same business. They are a credible website that publishes data impartially. I am a supporter of Ms. Clinton. She is well up in Colorado that has gone blue in the last 2 elections, elected a Democrat Governor and has a large Hispanic population. Looks good for Ms. Clinton; not so good for your messiah.
And, you'll note, I'm not making the case for Ms. Clinton win Texas, GA, AZ, AR, MO, or some of the other states that some liberals on here have made. Its not going to happen. But CO? In the bag.
The debate means everything to Hillary. Trump has been doing very well up to now and if Hillary blows the debate, it's all over for her.So cute, that you think the debate matters. Unless there are some theatrics...unlikely anyone's mind will be changed.
Whatever you say.So cute, that you think the debate matters. Unless there are some theatrics...unlikely anyone's mind will be changed.
lol Over 270 by next Wednesday.Buh, buh, buh, buh, buh, but Trump will never get more than 100 EVs!
Whatever happens, it is fascinating to me.
Never has there been such an extreme situation in politics that I can remember.
I could list what I hear about both of them, but it really does not matter.
I've seen enough to know that I don't like either. They suck.
What is fascinating to me are the "givens" that never materialized.
Morons like C_Clayton_Jones kept saying "He'll never be the nominee". We he is.
Other thought Bernie Sanders (my guy) would flame out early. The superdelegate system needs to be revisited. I don't care how much you argue they didn't matter...it is clear they impacted aspects of this campaign. Why do they exist anyway ? They are a testament to cronyism.
HIllary Clinton would coast to the election and wipe out ANY gop challenger.
Hillary has been spending money like crazy and it's not doing s**t for her numbers.
Trump has shoved his foot shin and thigh into his mouth in some cases and still seems to be hanging on. The Trump folks better hope he does not know any terms like "legitimate rape". That could sink him.
It's all been very interesting.
I've watched people at work cuss both candidates, but now decide to go with one of them (on an individual basis). Once they choose to go, they stay informed. Some have changed their minds.
Like I said, interesting.
Or Colorado, which is very close, or Wisconsin or New Hampshire which would throw the election into the House of Representatives with a Republican majority.
Both belong to Ms. Clinton.
CO does not belong to Mrs. Clinton.
Lying again.
Real Clear has it as a toss up. She has a "lead" but it isn't a great deal. What's more funny is that there appears to be almost 20% undecided.
Did your book of fairy tales get an ISBN number ?
Again.
RCP and I are not in the same business. They are a credible website that publishes data impartially. I am a supporter of Ms. Clinton. She is well up in Colorado that has gone blue in the last 2 elections, elected a Democrat Governor and has a large Hispanic population. Looks good for Ms. Clinton; not so good for your messiah.
Whatever happens, it is fascinating to me.
Never has there been such an extreme situation in politics that I can remember.
I could list what I hear about both of them, but it really does not matter.
I've seen enough to know that I don't like either. They suck.
What is fascinating to me are the "givens" that never materialized.
Morons like C_Clayton_Jones kept saying "He'll never be the nominee". We he is.
Other thought Bernie Sanders (my guy) would flame out early. The superdelegate system needs to be revisited. I don't care how much you argue they didn't matter...it is clear they impacted aspects of this campaign. Why do they exist anyway ? They are a testament to cronyism.
HIllary Clinton would coast to the election and wipe out ANY gop challenger.
Hillary has been spending money like crazy and it's not doing s**t for her numbers.
Trump has shoved his foot shin and thigh into his mouth in some cases and still seems to be hanging on. The Trump folks better hope he does not know any terms like "legitimate rape". That could sink him.
It's all been very interesting.
I've watched people at work cuss both candidates, but now decide to go with one of them (on an individual basis). Once they choose to go, they stay informed. Some have changed their minds.
Like I said, interesting.
I know 6 people who are voting for Hillary because "Trump is a &*&&&*"
I know a few hundred people who are enthusiastically voting for Trump.
It is very strange, but then Hillary has always been a very strange person, and while Trump lives in Manhattan now, he was raised in Queens, and that's how people speak in Queens, very strangely.Whatever happens, it is fascinating to me.
Never has there been such an extreme situation in politics that I can remember.
I could list what I hear about both of them, but it really does not matter.
I've seen enough to know that I don't like either. They suck.
What is fascinating to me are the "givens" that never materialized.
Morons like C_Clayton_Jones kept saying "He'll never be the nominee". We he is.
Other thought Bernie Sanders (my guy) would flame out early. The superdelegate system needs to be revisited. I don't care how much you argue they didn't matter...it is clear they impacted aspects of this campaign. Why do they exist anyway ? They are a testament to cronyism.
HIllary Clinton would coast to the election and wipe out ANY gop challenger.
Hillary has been spending money like crazy and it's not doing s**t for her numbers.
Trump has shoved his foot shin and thigh into his mouth in some cases and still seems to be hanging on. The Trump folks better hope he does not know any terms like "legitimate rape". That could sink him.
It's all been very interesting.
I've watched people at work cuss both candidates, but now decide to go with one of them (on an individual basis). Once they choose to go, they stay informed. Some have changed their minds.
Like I said, interesting.