Rapists should have parental rights?

I have said it for years,

If a man is found guilty of rape twice, that person should be castrated, and I don't mean chemically. if that don't fix him, then hang him, for there is no fixing him. Why twice? because people lie.

If a woman is found guilty of the same twice, then remove her sexual organs, if she does it again, then hang her, for you cant fix her.

Perhaps this is taking things a bit far, but if you remove the word rape, and replace it with the words child molestation, is that taking things to far?


Rape is not a crime of sex.
 
Iowa Republican blocks bill ending parental rights for convicted rapists as ‘feel-good’ lawmaking

An Iowa Republican has held up legislation that would prevent convicted rapists from claiming parental rights to children conceived during the assault, dismissing the bill as “feel-good” legislation.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
As reported by the Globe Gazette, State Rep. Chip Baltimore has bottled up the proposed bill in committee, infuriating women’s advocates who want to protect rape survivors from having to endure future court battles with their assailants.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
According to Jennifer Carlson, executive director of the University of Iowa’s Rape Victim Advocacy Program, “We see this as a huge struggle for those victims as they are worried for the safety of their child as well as seeing their offender on a regular basis.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
Baltimore, who is chairman of the Iowa House’s Judiciary Committee, feels the law is unnecessary and lacks nuance.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
“It’s a feel-good piece of legislation that quite honestly is dissociated with reality in the real world with the way the criminal justice system and the judicial system work,” Baltimore said. “It’s a far more complicated situation, honestly, than most people acknowledge. I get the general concept. I understand the general concept. But it’s a concept that needs a lot more work.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
Beth Barnhill, executive director of the Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault, disagrees.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/iow...for-convicted-rapists-as-feel-good-lawmaking/
“I’ve been doing this for 30 years, and I do not have trust in the system. There are many, many ways it fails,” she explained.


And, from another RW who despises women and children -


efa5d24ab3ce44abc687ead37a062c52.jpg




This is just vicious. Obviously, they want to give rapists easy access to their victims. Not just dangerous to the victims, this puts children at risk as well.

Once again, Repubs prove they have no concern for children and that they really are at war against women.
Although not representative of all republicans, this is nonetheless consistent with the social right's agenda hostile to women and their legitimate concerns; opposition to this measure is completely without merit.
 
I have said it for years,

If a man is found guilty of rape twice, that person should be castrated, and I don't mean chemically. if that don't fix him, then hang him, for there is no fixing him. Why twice? because people lie.

If a woman is found guilty of the same twice, then remove her sexual organs, if she does it again, then hang her, for you cant fix her.

Perhaps this is taking things a bit far, but if you remove the word rape, and replace it with the words child molestation, is that taking things to far?

women found guilty of rape? what are you blathering about? statutory rape of willing students who then marry them?

rape is a crime of violence.....
 
You understand what 'feel good' legislation means right?

It does not mean the legislator thinks that rapists should have parental rights but that the proposed law is meaningless because it does not address an actual problem.

Care to bring up a single case where a rapist has any parental rights? Do you have a link to the law that shows us the merits of the law?


This is one of the problems with politics today - some one comes up with a 'good idea' that is really an asinine concept that does not need to be codified in law and then slaps a good title on it and legislators MUST pass it because of hair on fire one liners.






I can't tell you how disgusting I find your post.

You might want to click the link below and choose your article. You can read all about how rapists in 31 states have a right to custody or see the child that is a product of him raping a woman.


‎www.bing.com/search?q=rapist+gets+visitation+to+child&go=Submit&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=rapist+gets+visitation+to+child&sc=0-7&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=92b686137…
 
He can say he's a republican but he's acting like a liberal


This sounds like something a liberal judge would uphold...


Those of us on the right would like to see rapist killed or life in prison. It's the liberals that want to give them a second chance. If it wasn't for liberals, the bill in question wouldn't be needed. Also what else is in the bill?


Repubs are in favor of rape or simply don't believe it exists.

Don't believe that? Read what REPUBLICANS have said at this link.


And, in addition to that list, anyone want to say these quotes are not by Repubs?


rapequotes.jpg
 
Republican logic comes from the Bible which sees women more like property (to be used by man).

In the Biblical hierarchy women are closer to nature (like animals or slaves).
 
Since when is the far left against anyone have any type of "rights"?

Another far left drone fail thread..

people on the left generally protect women and children. but a winger like you wouldn't understand that. now go crawl back into your basement.

Another far left drone running their religious programming!

Goes to show that words like "rights" and "equality" are just buzz words have no actual meaning for these far left drone..
 
This is to help blacks still be fathers

maybe if they were prosecuted for non-violent crime at the same rates as white males?

nah... why would a bigot like you want that?
Blacks commit crime at much higher rates then white males.

Why do you think blacks have Aids at much higher rates then white males?
 
He can say he's a republican but he's acting like a liberal


This sounds like something a liberal judge would uphold...


Those of us on the right would like to see rapist killed or life in prison. It's the liberals that want to give them a second chance. If it wasn't for liberals, the bill in question wouldn't be needed. Also what else is in the bill?


Repubs are in favor of rape or simply don't believe it exists.

Don't believe that? Read what REPUBLICANS have said at this link.


And, in addition to that list, anyone want to say these quotes are not by Repubs?


rapequotes.jpg

And there it is, the far left drone and their religious dogma..




You're right that the bible condones and even relishes rape.


Rape is one of the most heinous crimes imaginable. Yet few people know that the Bible often condones and even approves of rape. How anyone can get their moral guidance from a book that allows rape escapes me. Perhaps they have been lied to about the Bible and carefully detoured around all the nasty stuff in the Bible.

So grab your Bibles and follow along as I show you all the nasty rapes that your priests and preachers don't want to tell you about. Note that in many places in the Bible there are references to "taking a wife". Don't be fooled into thinking that these were voluntary marriages. This first quote clearly shows that murder and force were used to "take" these wives.



And religion is used as an excuse for rape.


In his final statement before he was punished, Navy Lieutenant Sean Banks quoted what he said was his favorite Bible verse.


"You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good," Banks said, noting he would drop his appeal if one of the victims passed a polygraph test.
 
This is to help blacks still be fathers

maybe if they were prosecuted for non-violent crime at the same rates as white males?

nah... why would a bigot like you want that?
Blacks commit crime at much higher rates then white males.

Why do you think blacks have Aids at much higher rates then white males?


Quit trying to derail the thread to another of your slimy ASSSinine kkk rants.

:offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic:
 
Since when is the far left against anyone have any type of "rights"?

Another far left drone fail thread..

people on the left generally protect women and children. but a winger like you wouldn't understand that. now go crawl back into your basement.

Another far left drone running their religious programming!

Goes to show that words like "rights" and "equality" are just buzz words have no actual meaning for these far left drone..


So, now you're saying rapists should have access to the victims?

And to the innocent children?
 
He can say he's a republican but he's acting like a liberal


This sounds like something a liberal judge would uphold...


Those of us on the right would like to see rapist killed or life in prison. It's the liberals that want to give them a second chance. If it wasn't for liberals, the bill in question wouldn't be needed. Also what else is in the bill?


Repubs are in favor of rape or simply don't believe it exists.

Don't believe that? Read what REPUBLICANS have said at this link.


And, in addition to that list, anyone want to say these quotes are not by Repubs?


rapequotes.jpg

And there it is, the far left drone and their religious dogma..




You're right that the bible condones and even relishes rape.


Rape is one of the most heinous crimes imaginable. Yet few people know that the Bible often condones and even approves of rape. How anyone can get their moral guidance from a book that allows rape escapes me. Perhaps they have been lied to about the Bible and carefully detoured around all the nasty stuff in the Bible.

So grab your Bibles and follow along as I show you all the nasty rapes that your priests and preachers don't want to tell you about. Note that in many places in the Bible there are references to "taking a wife". Don't be fooled into thinking that these were voluntary marriages. This first quote clearly shows that murder and force were used to "take" these wives.



And religion is used as an excuse for rape.


In his final statement before he was punished, Navy Lieutenant Sean Banks quoted what he said was his favorite Bible verse.


"You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good," Banks said, noting he would drop his appeal if one of the victims passed a polygraph test.

And there it is again the far left religious programmed drone running the far left narrative.

Just goes to show that the words "rights" and "equality" are meaningless when the far left uses them..
 
Your own link says black males commit over 40% of all rapes and are only 6% of the population.

it says offenders are overwhelmingly white males.

loon.
The link also counts Hispanics as White
 

Forum List

Back
Top