Rape and race

[JFK_USA]

So 67% of rapes are not committed by blacks but someone blacks are rape monsters? WTF?

 

[JFK_USA]

FBI Table 43

Point to me please the 'vast difference' in rapes by blacks vs whites (other than whites rape twice as much as blacks.)

White rapists: 8943
Blacks: 4229
Natives: 160
Asians: 173
Hawaiin/Pac Islanders: 7

Lol. That's the worst comeback I've seen in this thread. Not being able to calculate proportions you turn to blaming whites for still being a majority in the US

But the premise of the thread is that black people are prone to raping yet whites commit over twice as many rapes but no one says white people are prone to committing rapes. So why are only black people prone to doing it?

 

[Correll]

FBI Table 43

Point to me please the 'vast difference' in rapes by blacks vs whites (other than whites rape twice as much as blacks.)

White rapists: 8943
Blacks: 4229
Natives: 160
Asians: 173
Hawaiin/Pac Islanders: 7

You are aware that there are 5 times as many whites in this country as blacks, right?

Thus for there to be half as many black rapists as whites means that blacks are, in your words, far more "rapey" than whites.

And don't forget, that the FBI lumps hispanics in with whites too. The real discrepancy between whites and blacks is certainly even larger than it appears.


I understand that as a liberal this information is uncomfortable for you.

But if we are afraid to even identify that there is a problem, there is no chance of ever addressing it.

So? Per capita doesn't mean anything here. More than twice as many whites are arrested for rape as blacks. If you try to adjust it by population you're basicly just polishing a turd.

Per capita means everything here.

Just comparing absolute numbers hides the fact that the black community has a far larger problem with violent crime than the White Community, or American at large.

 

[Pogo]

Rape's a global pandemic. Has nothing to do with ethnicities as evidenced by India and Denmark.

False. In Scandinavia attackers are mostly Muslims. You probably know that only Muslims there are immigrants, coming for welfare from third world countries. Therefore rape has a lot do with race and culture of the attacker.

Bullshit non sequitur.

Again, rape is a (perverse) assertion of power. And that trait is universal, intraracially as well as interracially. The only "race" that perversion is a product of is the human race.

Food is "universal" too, and yet only a madman would claim it does not vary from culture to culture.

FBI stats have been posted showing a vast difference in the rate of rapes committed by blacks compared to "whites" (including hispanics).

There is a difference.

Face reality.

FBI stats would only apply to this country, dumbass. And that means you by definition have not stripped out the socioeconomic class factors, and thus still have no basis to dilute your conclusion down to a single one. Now you go out and measure within each of those classes -- and do it worldwide -- and get back to us with your pathetic racist shit.

Drawing an analogy between rape and food ---- what a maroon.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront her with information she doesn't like and she calls you a racist.


If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I have linked to a FBI stats showing that blacks, in this country, rape at a far higher rate than "whites", even when you lump hispanics in with Whites.

And just because something is universal, does not mean that culture does not effect it, that was my point, which I guess went over your head.

Who the fuck are you talking to? All the names above, I don't see a "her" in there. Are you lost?

 

[ninja007]

A third man has been charged with participating in a spring-break sexual assault on a woman on a Florida Panhandle beach that was captured on a cellphone video, authorities said Tuesday.

Third man arrested in spring break gang rape caught on video Fox News

We all know the news about poor girl sexually violated by a group of black men. Am I the only one who believes it is not a pure coincidence all three suspects are Afro-Americans? You can call me racists, bigot or whatever you want but there is a thing called statistics. Blacks commit interracial rape 2000 (!) more often than whites do. More than that, they commit 32.9% of all rapes in this country, while constituting only 13.6% of American population.
Your move, liberals.

I don't see a link proving your numbers but this is always at the heart of white men who hate Blacks. Its always about that old fear that the white guy can't measure up to the Black man. Why don't you just buy some Viagra?

But yes, I suspect you're right that liberal men are more sexually secure than you pathetic little weenies.

we can't measure up?Your right; we cant measure up to their high drop out rates, high gang membership rates, high rates of babies, high rates of incarceration, high rates of unemployment. Your right.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

FBI Table 43

Point to me please the 'vast difference' in rapes by blacks vs whites (other than whites rape twice as much as blacks.)

White rapists: 8943
Blacks: 4229
Natives: 160
Asians: 173
Hawaiin/Pac Islanders: 7

Lol. That's the worst comeback I've seen in this thread. Not being able to calculate proportions you turn to blaming whites for still being a majority in the US

But the premise of the thread is that black people are prone to raping yet whites commit over twice as many rapes but no one says white people are prone to committing rapes. So why are only black people prone to doing it?

Because white people aren't twice the population of blacks. Therefore per capita, blacks rape more often.

And it's because of the culture of victimhood you Leftists have cultivated. You tell blacks they're not responsible they begin to believe it. They are just following your lead.

And that's mighty white of you.

 

[Pogo]

FBI Table 43

Point to me please the 'vast difference' in rapes by blacks vs whites (other than whites rape twice as much as blacks.)

White rapists: 8943
Blacks: 4229
Natives: 160
Asians: 173
Hawaiin/Pac Islanders: 7

Lol. That's the worst comeback I've seen in this thread. Not being able to calculate proportions you turn to blaming whites for still being a majority in the US

But the premise of the thread is that black people are prone to raping yet whites commit over twice as many rapes but no one says white people are prone to committing rapes. So why are only black people prone to doing it?

Because white people aren't twice the population of blacks. Therefore per capita, blacks rape more often.

And it's because of the culture of victimhood you Leftists have cultivated. You tell blacks they're not responsible they begin to believe it. They are just following your lead.

And that's mighty white of you.

uh -- who "tells blacks they're not responsible"? You been snacking on paint-chip flavored Doritos again?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

FBI Table 43

Point to me please the 'vast difference' in rapes by blacks vs whites (other than whites rape twice as much as blacks.)

White rapists: 8943
Blacks: 4229
Natives: 160
Asians: 173
Hawaiin/Pac Islanders: 7

Lol. That's the worst comeback I've seen in this thread. Not being able to calculate proportions you turn to blaming whites for still being a majority in the US

But the premise of the thread is that black people are prone to raping yet whites commit over twice as many rapes but no one says white people are prone to committing rapes. So why are only black people prone to doing it?

Because white people aren't twice the population of blacks. Therefore per capita, blacks rape more often.

And it's because of the culture of victimhood you Leftists have cultivated. You tell blacks they're not responsible they begin to believe it. They are just following your lead.

And that's mighty white of you.

uh -- who "tells blacks they're not responsible"? You been snacking on paint-chip flavored Doritos again?

You.

 

[Pogo]

FBI Table 43

Point to me please the 'vast difference' in rapes by blacks vs whites (other than whites rape twice as much as blacks.)

White rapists: 8943
Blacks: 4229
Natives: 160
Asians: 173
Hawaiin/Pac Islanders: 7

Lol. That's the worst comeback I've seen in this thread. Not being able to calculate proportions you turn to blaming whites for still being a majority in the US

But the premise of the thread is that black people are prone to raping yet whites commit over twice as many rapes but no one says white people are prone to committing rapes. So why are only black people prone to doing it?

Because white people aren't twice the population of blacks. Therefore per capita, blacks rape more often.

And it's because of the culture of victimhood you Leftists have cultivated. You tell blacks they're not responsible they begin to believe it. They are just following your lead.

And that's mighty white of you.

uh -- who "tells blacks they're not responsible"? You been snacking on paint-chip flavored Doritos again?

You.

I knew you couldn't answer that. It's why I put the question out there.
I don't get it -- I keep setting the same trap over and over and I keep making kills.

 

[Correll]

False. In Scandinavia attackers are mostly Muslims. You probably know that only Muslims there are immigrants, coming for welfare from third world countries. Therefore rape has a lot do with race and culture of the attacker.

Bullshit non sequitur.

Again, rape is a (perverse) assertion of power. And that trait is universal, intraracially as well as interracially. The only "race" that perversion is a product of is the human race.

Food is "universal" too, and yet only a madman would claim it does not vary from culture to culture.

FBI stats have been posted showing a vast difference in the rate of rapes committed by blacks compared to "whites" (including hispanics).

There is a difference.

Face reality.

FBI stats would only apply to this country, dumbass. And that means you by definition have not stripped out the socioeconomic class factors, and thus still have no basis to dilute your conclusion down to a single one. Now you go out and measure within each of those classes -- and do it worldwide -- and get back to us with your pathetic racist shit.

Drawing an analogy between rape and food ---- what a maroon.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront her with information she doesn't like and she calls you a racist.


If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I have linked to a FBI stats showing that blacks, in this country, rape at a far higher rate than "whites", even when you lump hispanics in with Whites.

And just because something is universal, does not mean that culture does not effect it, that was my point, which I guess went over your head.

Who the fuck are you talking to? All the names above, I don't see a "her" in there. Are you lost?

What? Am I supposed to assume all posters are men? I was talking to you, obviously.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront HIM with information HE doesn't like and HE calls you a racist.


If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I have linked to a FBI stats showing that blacks, in this country, rape at a far higher rate than "whites", even when you lump hispanics in with Whites.

And just because something is universal, does not mean that culture does not effect it, that was my point, which I guess went over your head.

 

[Pogo]

Bullshit non sequitur.

Again, rape is a (perverse) assertion of power. And that trait is universal, intraracially as well as interracially. The only "race" that perversion is a product of is the human race.

Food is "universal" too, and yet only a madman would claim it does not vary from culture to culture.

FBI stats have been posted showing a vast difference in the rate of rapes committed by blacks compared to "whites" (including hispanics).

There is a difference.

Face reality.

FBI stats would only apply to this country, dumbass. And that means you by definition have not stripped out the socioeconomic class factors, and thus still have no basis to dilute your conclusion down to a single one. Now you go out and measure within each of those classes -- and do it worldwide -- and get back to us with your pathetic racist shit.

Drawing an analogy between rape and food ---- what a maroon.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront her with information she doesn't like and she calls you a racist.


If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I have linked to a FBI stats showing that blacks, in this country, rape at a far higher rate than "whites", even when you lump hispanics in with Whites.

And just because something is universal, does not mean that culture does not effect it, that was my point, which I guess went over your head.

Who the fuck are you talking to? All the names above, I don't see a "her" in there. Are you lost?

What? Am I supposed to assume all posters are men? I was talking to you, obviously.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront HIM with information HE doesn't like and HE calls you a racist.

--- huh?

Do you just not read English?

If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I'm not the one making threads out of cum hoc ergo propter hoc fantasy fallacies here white-hood boy.
I don't make the laws of logic -- I just enforce 'em.

 

[Correll]

Food is "universal" too, and yet only a madman would claim it does not vary from culture to culture.

FBI stats have been posted showing a vast difference in the rate of rapes committed by blacks compared to "whites" (including hispanics).

There is a difference.

Face reality.

FBI stats would only apply to this country, dumbass. And that means you by definition have not stripped out the socioeconomic class factors, and thus still have no basis to dilute your conclusion down to a single one. Now you go out and measure within each of those classes -- and do it worldwide -- and get back to us with your pathetic racist shit.

Drawing an analogy between rape and food ---- what a maroon.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront her with information she doesn't like and she calls you a racist.


If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I have linked to a FBI stats showing that blacks, in this country, rape at a far higher rate than "whites", even when you lump hispanics in with Whites.

And just because something is universal, does not mean that culture does not effect it, that was my point, which I guess went over your head.

Who the fuck are you talking to? All the names above, I don't see a "her" in there. Are you lost?

What? Am I supposed to assume all posters are men? I was talking to you, obviously.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront HIM with information HE doesn't like and HE calls you a racist.

--- huh?

Do you just not read English?

If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I'm not the one making threads out of cum hoc ergo propter hoc fantasy fallacies here white-hood boy.
I don't make the laws of logic -- I just enforce 'em.

There has been no discussion of an event causing an event.

The topic is the high rate of rapes committed by blacks.

We can't discuss any possible causes, because you libs are to busy, 1. denying reality, and 2. calling us racist.

 

[Pogo]

FBI stats would only apply to this country, dumbass. And that means you by definition have not stripped out the socioeconomic class factors, and thus still have no basis to dilute your conclusion down to a single one. Now you go out and measure within each of those classes -- and do it worldwide -- and get back to us with your pathetic racist shit.

Drawing an analogy between rape and food ---- what a maroon.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront her with information she doesn't like and she calls you a racist.


If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I have linked to a FBI stats showing that blacks, in this country, rape at a far higher rate than "whites", even when you lump hispanics in with Whites.

And just because something is universal, does not mean that culture does not effect it, that was my point, which I guess went over your head.

Who the fuck are you talking to? All the names above, I don't see a "her" in there. Are you lost?

What? Am I supposed to assume all posters are men? I was talking to you, obviously.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront HIM with information HE doesn't like and HE calls you a racist.

--- huh?

Do you just not read English?

If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I'm not the one making threads out of cum hoc ergo propter hoc fantasy fallacies here white-hood boy.
I don't make the laws of logic -- I just enforce 'em.

There has been no discussion of an event causing an event.

Say, you really are illiterate aintcha? I said cum hoc, not post hoc.

The cum hoc fallacy is committed when it is assumed that because two things occur together, they must be causally related. This, however, does not follow; correlation is possible without causation. This fallacy is closely related to the post hoc fallacy.

Example
As the graph below (taken from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster website) shows, two things have happened since the early 19th-century: one is that the number of pirates has declined, the other is that global average temperatures have risen.

If correlation implied causation, we would be able to infer a connection between these two events. It is not the case, however, that global warming is an effect of the decline in piracy. Neither is the decline in piracy the result of increasing temperatures. Mere correlation does not imply a causal connection. -- Logical Fallacies​

Get it now? "Pirates" = "rapes" and "blacks" = "global warming". Or vice versa, doesn't matter. The irrelevance is equal.

The topic is the high rate of rapes committed by blacks.

--- which is not only based on the cum hoc fallacy above, it is implicitly all by itself such a fallacy.

[We can't discuss any possible causes, because you libs are to busy, 1. denying reality, and 2. calling us racist.

Bad spellers too. But "fallacious" is not the same as "racist". Although you need the former to arrive at the latter.

 

[Correll]

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront her with information she doesn't like and she calls you a racist.


If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I have linked to a FBI stats showing that blacks, in this country, rape at a far higher rate than "whites", even when you lump hispanics in with Whites.

And just because something is universal, does not mean that culture does not effect it, that was my point, which I guess went over your head.

Who the fuck are you talking to? All the names above, I don't see a "her" in there. Are you lost?

What? Am I supposed to assume all posters are men? I was talking to you, obviously.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront HIM with information HE doesn't like and HE calls you a racist.

--- huh?

Do you just not read English?

If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I'm not the one making threads out of cum hoc ergo propter hoc fantasy fallacies here white-hood boy.
I don't make the laws of logic -- I just enforce 'em.

There has been no discussion of an event causing an event.

Say, you really are illiterate aintcha? I said cum hoc, not post hoc.

The cum hoc fallacy is committed when it is assumed that because two things occur together, they must be causally related. This, however, does not follow; correlation is possible without causation. This fallacy is closely related to the post hoc fallacy.

Example
As the graph below (taken from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster website) shows, two things have happened since the early 19th-century: one is that the number of pirates has declined, the other is that global average temperatures have risen.

If correlation implied causation, we would be able to infer a connection between these two events. It is not the case, however, that global warming is an effect of the decline in piracy. Neither is the decline in piracy the result of increasing temperatures. Mere correlation does not imply a causal connection. -- Logical Fallacies​

Get it now? "Pirates" = "rapes" and "blacks" = "global warming". Or vice versa, doesn't matter. The irrelevance is equal.

The topic is the high rate of rapes committed by blacks.

--- which is not only based on the cum hoc fallacy above, it is implicitly all by itself such a fallacy.

[We can't discuss any possible causes, because you libs are to busy, 1. denying reality, and 2. calling us racist.

Bad spellers too. But "fallacious" is not the same as "racist". Although you need the former to arrive at the latter.

Not being fluent in Latin is not quite the same as being illiterate, as least I know that, so that puts me ahead of you, asshole.

And there is no correlation or cause here. We have not discussed cause.

So wtf are you on about, libtard?

 

[Pogo]

Who the fuck are you talking to? All the names above, I don't see a "her" in there. Are you lost?

What? Am I supposed to assume all posters are men? I was talking to you, obviously.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront HIM with information HE doesn't like and HE calls you a racist.

--- huh?

Do you just not read English?

If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I'm not the one making threads out of cum hoc ergo propter hoc fantasy fallacies here white-hood boy.
I don't make the laws of logic -- I just enforce 'em.

There has been no discussion of an event causing an event.

Say, you really are illiterate aintcha? I said cum hoc, not post hoc.

The cum hoc fallacy is committed when it is assumed that because two things occur together, they must be causally related. This, however, does not follow; correlation is possible without causation. This fallacy is closely related to the post hoc fallacy.

Example
As the graph below (taken from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster website) shows, two things have happened since the early 19th-century: one is that the number of pirates has declined, the other is that global average temperatures have risen.

If correlation implied causation, we would be able to infer a connection between these two events. It is not the case, however, that global warming is an effect of the decline in piracy. Neither is the decline in piracy the result of increasing temperatures. Mere correlation does not imply a causal connection. -- Logical Fallacies​

Get it now? "Pirates" = "rapes" and "blacks" = "global warming". Or vice versa, doesn't matter. The irrelevance is equal.

The topic is the high rate of rapes committed by blacks.

--- which is not only based on the cum hoc fallacy above, it is implicitly all by itself such a fallacy.

[We can't discuss any possible causes, because you libs are to busy, 1. denying reality, and 2. calling us racist.

Bad spellers too. But "fallacious" is not the same as "racist". Although you need the former to arrive at the latter.

Not being fluent in Latin is not quite the same as being illiterate, as least I know that, so that puts me ahead of you, asshole.

And there is no correlation or cause here. We have not discussed cause.

So wtf are you on about, libtard?

No no, ad hominem is a different fallacy. Which is not to say you can't run multiple fallacies concurrently -- clearly you can.

 

[Correll]

What? Am I supposed to assume all posters are men? I was talking to you, obviously.

Typical liberal dumb shit. Confront HIM with information HE doesn't like and HE calls you a racist.

--- huh?

Do you just not read English?

If you think that socio-economic factors explain the vast difference in rape rates, then you find a study to support that opinion, asshole.

I'm not the one making threads out of cum hoc ergo propter hoc fantasy fallacies here white-hood boy.
I don't make the laws of logic -- I just enforce 'em.

There has been no discussion of an event causing an event.

Say, you really are illiterate aintcha? I said cum hoc, not post hoc.

The cum hoc fallacy is committed when it is assumed that because two things occur together, they must be causally related. This, however, does not follow; correlation is possible without causation. This fallacy is closely related to the post hoc fallacy.

Example
As the graph below (taken from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster website) shows, two things have happened since the early 19th-century: one is that the number of pirates has declined, the other is that global average temperatures have risen.

If correlation implied causation, we would be able to infer a connection between these two events. It is not the case, however, that global warming is an effect of the decline in piracy. Neither is the decline in piracy the result of increasing temperatures. Mere correlation does not imply a causal connection. -- Logical Fallacies​

Get it now? "Pirates" = "rapes" and "blacks" = "global warming". Or vice versa, doesn't matter. The irrelevance is equal.

The topic is the high rate of rapes committed by blacks.

--- which is not only based on the cum hoc fallacy above, it is implicitly all by itself such a fallacy.

[We can't discuss any possible causes, because you libs are to busy, 1. denying reality, and 2. calling us racist.

Bad spellers too. But "fallacious" is not the same as "racist". Although you need the former to arrive at the latter.

Not being fluent in Latin is not quite the same as being illiterate, as least I know that, so that puts me ahead of you, asshole.

And there is no correlation or cause here. We have not discussed cause.

So wtf are you on about, libtard?

No no, ad hominem is a different fallacy. Which is not to say you can't run multiple fallacies concurrently -- clearly you can.

You started it, hood boy.

Just trying to sink to your level.

So, do you admit that blacks rape at disproportionate rate?

Because some of your lib buddies don't seem to understand that.

 

[Katzndogz]

When a white woman complains that she was raped by a white man she has been raped.

When a white woman complains that she was raped by a black man she is a racist.

 

[Brian_1349]

FBI Table 43

Point to me please the 'vast difference' in rapes by blacks vs whites (other than whites rape twice as much as blacks.)

White rapists: 8943
Blacks: 4229
Natives: 160
Asians: 173
Hawaiin/Pac Islanders: 7

Lol. That's the worst comeback I've seen in this thread. Not being able to calculate proportions you turn to blaming whites for still being a majority in the US

If you need to falsify statistical claims to express your racism that's your problem.

That's your problem you are mathematically illiterate and cannot draw conclusions from a table third grader will understand. Calling me racist for providing FBI official statistics is neither fair, nor smart. Looks like emphasizing black community's problems is racist until you are black yourself. However, criticizing whites is widely approved.

 

[Correll]

FBI Table 43

Point to me please the 'vast difference' in rapes by blacks vs whites (other than whites rape twice as much as blacks.)

White rapists: 8943
Blacks: 4229
Natives: 160
Asians: 173
Hawaiin/Pac Islanders: 7

Lol. That's the worst comeback I've seen in this thread. Not being able to calculate proportions you turn to blaming whites for still being a majority in the US

If you need to falsify statistical claims to express your racism that's your problem.

That's your problem you are mathematically illiterate and cannot draw conclusions from a table third grader will understand. Calling me racist for providing FBI official statistics is neither fair, nor smart. Looks like emphasizing black community's problems is racist until you are black yourself. However, criticizing whites is widely approved.

I think he is in a state of psychological denial.

He is emotionally invested in the idea of himself as a good progressive and in order to be a part of that tribe, he cannot admit that blacks are the reasons for their own problems.

 

[September]

^
The true reason for the white man's rage

​