Rand Paul caught lying on video

Politifact's Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it'

Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it' | PolitiFact

Let me know when he rivals the Amateur-in-Chief, the current reigning "Liar of the Year".

I think Paul is disingenuous and a serial panderer...but an Obama supporter calling anyone out for lying is like a fish ridiculing someone for being wet.

Basically?

That wasn't a lie.

President Obama didn't see what was coming. In 2009, insurance companies cobbled together plans they knew wouldn't be up to muster once the full law took effect. It was a pretty crappy thing to do as well.

And in any case? President Obama apologized for this..


While "President Obama didn't see what was coming" pretty much sums up the Obama Presidency, in this case Politifact concluded that he did.

But if you're an Obama supporter, ever consistent, it's POLITIFACT that's lying, and it's always someone else who's to blame.
 
OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!!

A politician told a lie.

Something like this has never happened before!!!

THE HORROR
 
No problem. I fully support Rand, and I support everything he just said. The more that ticks you people off, the more I support him, because he's right.

its not a case of ticking us off, that's the least of our thinking ... its the idea that people like you refused to admit they are racist ... the fact that we point out your problem people like you think we are mad or we are making it up, or some stupid reason you feel you have pick the right fight to fight... its I don’t mind debating smart people. They know the limitations of their position. It’s debating stupid people that’s hard:lol::lol::lol:

Well, too bad for you, we don't care what you think. We're going to vote for him again, and you'll just have to deal with it. Oh well.

We often say that some RWs are "low info" but its far worse than that. Just as this post ^^^ says, they know they're being lied to, they know they're being screwed over by the GOP, they know the GOP promises only one thing - to keep them poor, and yet, they vote for them.

Its a shame they don't secede because, as it is, the rest of us have to pay for their wanton self-destruction.

Indeed, we have to literally pay because its the blue states, the Dems who pay to support the RWs in the red states.
 
Watch: Rand Paul Caught Red-Handed Lying about past Objections to Civil Rights Act | Occupy Democrats

Presidential hopeful and Tea Party darling Rand Paul has long held objections to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, shamefully arguing that private businesses that serve the general public should have the right to discriminate.

The landmark civil rights legislation outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, including in private businesses that serve the general public, such as restaurants and hotels.

When asked by the Louisville Courier-Journal in 2010 if he would have voted for the civil rights acts of 1964, Paul evasively replied, “I like the Civil Rights Act in the sense that it ended discrimination in all public domains, and I’m all in favor of that.”

“But?” the interviewer asked him, in response to which Paul chuckled as if questioning substantive provisions in the Civil Rights Act were a laughing matter.

“You had to ask me the ‘but.’ I don’t like the idea of telling private business owners — I abhor racism. I think it’s a bad business decision to exclude anybody from your restaurant — but, at the same time, I do believe in private ownership.”

The Courier-Journal reported in 2010 that Paul’s critique of the Civil Rights Act echoed “the views of his father [Rep. Ron Paul], who stood up on the House floor when it celebrated the 40th anniversary of the act in 2004 and denounced it as ‘a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society.’”

Paul took a similar position that year when asked by Rachel Maddow, who has been following Paul’s attempts to deny his history of statements objecting to sections of Civil Rights Act.

Paul recently told NBC that he is not longer concerned about any of the titles in the Civil Rights Act, and that he never said that he was.

This chronic liar is definitely running for prez.

Now, watch the RWs say they agree with him and/or make excuses for his reprehensible position and his lies.

Like other stupid people, I think they're getting hung up on the word 'private.' A private business is not like a clubhouse in your backyard when you can exclude anyone you wish. By setting up a business you're subjecting yourself to numerous laws and regulations in how you carry out that business. Simply because it's a 'private business' does not then mean you can ignore the laws of the land doing as you please.
 
Watch: Rand Paul Caught Red-Handed Lying about past Objections to Civil Rights Act | Occupy Democrats

Presidential hopeful and Tea Party darling Rand Paul has long held objections to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, shamefully arguing that private businesses that serve the general public should have the right to discriminate.

The landmark civil rights legislation outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, including in private businesses that serve the general public, such as restaurants and hotels.

When asked by the Louisville Courier-Journal in 2010 if he would have voted for the civil rights acts of 1964, Paul evasively replied, “I like the Civil Rights Act in the sense that it ended discrimination in all public domains, and I’m all in favor of that.”

“But?” the interviewer asked him, in response to which Paul chuckled as if questioning substantive provisions in the Civil Rights Act were a laughing matter.

“You had to ask me the ‘but.’ I don’t like the idea of telling private business owners — I abhor racism. I think it’s a bad business decision to exclude anybody from your restaurant — but, at the same time, I do believe in private ownership.”

The Courier-Journal reported in 2010 that Paul’s critique of the Civil Rights Act echoed “the views of his father [Rep. Ron Paul], who stood up on the House floor when it celebrated the 40th anniversary of the act in 2004 and denounced it as ‘a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society.’”

Paul took a similar position that year when asked by Rachel Maddow, who has been following Paul’s attempts to deny his history of statements objecting to sections of Civil Rights Act.

Paul recently told NBC that he is not longer concerned about any of the titles in the Civil Rights Act, and that he never said that he was.

This chronic liar is definitely running for prez.

Now, watch the RWs say they agree with him and/or make excuses for his reprehensible position and his lies.
Yeah cause lauding the civil rights act and also believing in private ownership is the same as racism.

What's it like having the intelligence of a rock?
 
Last edited:
its not a case of ticking us off, that's the least of our thinking ... its the idea that people like you refused to admit they are racist ... the fact that we point out your problem people like you think we are mad or we are making it up, or some stupid reason you feel you have pick the right fight to fight... its I don’t mind debating smart people. They know the limitations of their position. It’s debating stupid people that’s hard:lol::lol::lol:

Well, too bad for you, we don't care what you think. We're going to vote for him again, and you'll just have to deal with it. Oh well.

We often say that some RWs are "low info" but its far worse than that. Just as this post ^^^ says, they know they're being lied to, they know they're being screwed over by the GOP, they know the GOP promises only one thing - to keep them poor, and yet, they vote for them.

Its a shame they don't secede because, as it is, the rest of us have to pay for their wanton self-destruction.

Indeed, we have to literally pay because its the blue states, the Dems who pay to support the RWs in the red states.

Yeah, I'm being lied to by *YOU*. We don't care what liars like you think about us. Sucks to be you, we can vote too. Have a nice day.
 
Hey, Libby Nuttly, here are OVER 2.7 MILLION YOUTUBES on "Omama Lies".... shall we critique them all?....Fucking retarded ****!

obama lies - YouTube

Unfortunately 99.9% of those so called lies are just out of context horse shit. With so many real issues to deal with you have to wonder why these idiots have to make shit up all the time. It's too bad most of Obama's critics aren't a little smarter, they might have accomplished something by now.

List the ones that are out of context, or you're a lying subversive piece of shit....waiting!
 
Hey, Libby Nuttly, here are OVER 2.7 MILLION YOUTUBES on "Omama Lies".... shall we critique them all?....Fucking retarded ****!

obama lies - YouTube

flash news
flash news

flash news

flash news
stick to the subject at hand .... this op is about rand paul not barrack Obama ... try again....
maybe you can take your words of wisdom to another thread entitled Obama lies and give your words of wisdom there...

Why, you pond scum do it in every post by the right!.... hypocrite!
 
I think that Rand did back-track on this. I think he did so, because he wants to distance himself from those comments.

Firstly, I don't hold the earlier opinion about this against him in the least.

Secondly, I wish he had just said that he he had changed his mind, instead of denying it, which he clearly did.

Lastly, I do not hold this (back-tracking) against him; It's not a huge deal to me anyway - It certainly should not put a damper on his presidential aspirations.


Edit: I really like his dad and there are times I wish Rand was more like Ron.
 
Last edited:
Hey, Libby Nuttly, here are OVER 2.7 MILLION YOUTUBES on "Omama Lies".... shall we critique them all?....Fucking retarded ****!

obama lies - YouTube

Unfortunately 99.9% of those so called lies are just out of context horse shit. With so many real issues to deal with you have to wonder why these idiots have to make shit up all the time. It's too bad most of Obama's critics aren't a little smarter, they might have accomplished something by now.

List the ones that are out of context, or you're a lying subversive piece of shit....waiting!

It's a really long list and I don't feel like it. How about this: you post the so called lies and then I'll tear them to shreds one at time. How would that be.......fucking half wit.
 
Unfortunately 99.9% of those so called lies are just out of context horse shit. With so many real issues to deal with you have to wonder why these idiots have to make shit up all the time. It's too bad most of Obama's critics aren't a little smarter, they might have accomplished something by now.

List the ones that are out of context, or you're a lying subversive piece of shit....waiting!

It's a really long list and I don't feel like it. How about this: you post the so called lies and then I'll tear them to shreds one at time. How would that be.......fucking half wit.

I can wait, after all I asked FIRST! ....or did it take all this time for your 2 digit IQ to kick in?:badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:
 
List the ones that are out of context, or you're a lying subversive piece of shit....waiting!

It's a really long list and I don't feel like it. How about this: you post the so called lies and then I'll tear them to shreds one at time. How would that be.......fucking half wit.

I can wait, after all I asked FIRST! ....or did it take all this time for your 2 digit IQ to kick in?:badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:

Feel free to start posting all those U-Tube lies.
 
Yes. Freedom of association, or defense of it in the face of state zealotry, is considered 'shameful'. Which is, shameful.
 
It's a really long list and I don't feel like it. How about this: you post the so called lies and then I'll tear them to shreds one at time. How would that be.......fucking half wit.

I can wait, after all I asked FIRST! ....or did it take all this time for your 2 digit IQ to kick in?:badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:

Feel free to start posting all those U-Tube lies.

Ok start with this one....

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UErR7i2onW0]7 Lies In Under 2 Minutes - YouTube[/ame]
 
I can wait, after all I asked FIRST! ....or did it take all this time for your 2 digit IQ to kick in?:badgrin::badgrin::eusa_clap:

Feel free to start posting all those U-Tube lies.

Ok start with this one....

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UErR7i2onW0]7 Lies In Under 2 Minutes - YouTube[/ame]

Now maybe you can explain where the lies are......as if you ever had any idea. Where are they? Explain in detail numbers one through seven, or do you have to rely on the video to do your thinking for you?
 
Feel free to start posting all those U-Tube lies.

Ok start with this one....

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UErR7i2onW0"]7 Lies In Under 2 Minutes - YouTube[/ame]

Now maybe you can explain where the lies are......as if you ever had any idea. Where are they? Explain in detail numbers one through seven, or do you have to rely on the video to do your thinking for you?

I'm sorry, I should realize you fucking subversives don't understand English when it's in complete disagreement with your agenda.... and the answers to your questions are spoken on a video... Damn, these asshole LIE in front of us, and don't expect anyone to question them! :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:...The entertainment is picking up tonight!
 

Now maybe you can explain where the lies are......as if you ever had any idea. Where are they? Explain in detail numbers one through seven, or do you have to rely on the video to do your thinking for you?

I'm sorry, I should realize you fucking subversives don't understand English when it's in complete disagreement with your agenda.... and the answers to your questions are spoken on a video... Damn, these asshole LIE in front of us, and don't expect anyone to question them! :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:...The entertainment is picking up tonight!

Maybe you can come up with something specific.....try that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top