Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Presidential hopeful and Tea Party darling Rand Paul has long held objections to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, shamefully arguing that private businesses that serve the general public should have the right to discriminate.
The landmark civil rights legislation outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, including in private businesses that serve the general public, such as restaurants and hotels.
When asked by the Louisville Courier-Journal in 2010 if he would have voted for the civil rights acts of 1964, Paul evasively replied, “I like the Civil Rights Act in the sense that it ended discrimination in all public domains, and I’m all in favor of that.”
“But?” the interviewer asked him, in response to which Paul chuckled as if questioning substantive provisions in the Civil Rights Act were a laughing matter.
“You had to ask me the ‘but.’ I don’t like the idea of telling private business owners — I abhor racism. I think it’s a bad business decision to exclude anybody from your restaurant — but, at the same time, I do believe in private ownership.”
The Courier-Journal reported in 2010 that Paul’s critique of the Civil Rights Act echoed “the views of his father [Rep. Ron Paul], who stood up on the House floor when it celebrated the 40th anniversary of the act in 2004 and denounced it as ‘a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society.’”
Paul took a similar position that year when asked by Rachel Maddow, who has been following Paul’s attempts to deny his history of statements objecting to sections of Civil Rights Act.
Paul recently told NBC that he is not longer concerned about any of the titles in the Civil Rights Act, and that he never said that he was.
You had to ask me the but. I dont like the idea of telling private business owners I abhor racism. I think its a bad business decision to exclude anybody from your restaurant but, at the same time, I do believe in private ownership.
The Courier-Journal reported in 2010 that Pauls critique of the Civil Rights Act echoed the views of his father [Rep. Ron Paul], who stood up on the House floor when it celebrated the 40th anniversary of the act in 2004 and denounced it as a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society.
Hey, Libby Nuttly, here are OVER 2.7 MILLION YOUTUBES on "Omama Lies".... shall we critique them all?....Fucking retarded ****!
obama lies - YouTube
Where does the left find this spin? In the anarchist club "occupy wall street"?
Hey, Libby Nuttly, here are OVER 2.7 MILLION YOUTUBES on "Omama Lies".... shall we critique them all?....Fucking retarded ****!
obama lies - YouTube
Mt Maddow tried this on her show when Rand ran for Senate.
How'd that work out?
People are tired of the Race Card but by all means, please keep using it.
Watch: Rand Paul Caught Red-Handed Lying about past Objections to Civil Rights Act | Occupy Democrats
Presidential hopeful and Tea Party darling Rand Paul has long held objections to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, shamefully arguing that private businesses that serve the general public should have the right to discriminate.
The landmark civil rights legislation outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, including in private businesses that serve the general public, such as restaurants and hotels.
When asked by the Louisville Courier-Journal in 2010 if he would have voted for the civil rights acts of 1964, Paul evasively replied, I like the Civil Rights Act in the sense that it ended discrimination in all public domains, and Im all in favor of that.
But? the interviewer asked him, in response to which Paul chuckled as if questioning substantive provisions in the Civil Rights Act were a laughing matter.
You had to ask me the but. I dont like the idea of telling private business owners I abhor racism. I think its a bad business decision to exclude anybody from your restaurant but, at the same time, I do believe in private ownership.
The Courier-Journal reported in 2010 that Pauls critique of the Civil Rights Act echoed the views of his father [Rep. Ron Paul], who stood up on the House floor when it celebrated the 40th anniversary of the act in 2004 and denounced it as a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society.
Paul took a similar position that year when asked by Rachel Maddow, who has been following Pauls attempts to deny his history of statements objecting to sections of Civil Rights Act.
Paul recently told NBC that he is not longer concerned about any of the titles in the Civil Rights Act, and that he never said that he was.
This chronic liar is definitely running for prez.
Now, watch the RWs say they agree with him and/or make excuses for his reprehensible position and his lies.
Hey, Libby Nuttly, here are OVER 2.7 MILLION YOUTUBES on "Omama Lies".... shall we critique them all?....Fucking retarded ****!
obama lies - YouTube
Unfortunately 99.9% of those so called lies are just out of context horse shit. With so many real issues to deal with you have to wonder why these idiots have to make shit up all the time. It's too bad most of Obama's critics aren't a little smarter, they might have accomplished something by now.
Politifact's Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it'
Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it' | PolitiFact
Let me know when he rivals the Amateur-in-Chief, the current reigning "Liar of the Year".
I think Paul is disingenuous and a serial panderer...but an Obama supporter calling anyone out for lying is like a fish ridiculing someone for being wet.
Watch: Rand Paul Caught Red-Handed Lying about past Objections to Civil Rights Act | Occupy Democrats
Presidential hopeful and Tea Party darling Rand Paul has long held objections to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, shamefully arguing that private businesses that serve the general public should have the right to discriminate.
The landmark civil rights legislation outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, including in private businesses that serve the general public, such as restaurants and hotels.
When asked by the Louisville Courier-Journal in 2010 if he would have voted for the civil rights acts of 1964, Paul evasively replied, I like the Civil Rights Act in the sense that it ended discrimination in all public domains, and Im all in favor of that.
But? the interviewer asked him, in response to which Paul chuckled as if questioning substantive provisions in the Civil Rights Act were a laughing matter.
You had to ask me the but. I dont like the idea of telling private business owners I abhor racism. I think its a bad business decision to exclude anybody from your restaurant but, at the same time, I do believe in private ownership.
The Courier-Journal reported in 2010 that Pauls critique of the Civil Rights Act echoed the views of his father [Rep. Ron Paul], who stood up on the House floor when it celebrated the 40th anniversary of the act in 2004 and denounced it as a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society.
Paul took a similar position that year when asked by Rachel Maddow, who has been following Pauls attempts to deny his history of statements objecting to sections of Civil Rights Act.
Paul recently told NBC that he is not longer concerned about any of the titles in the Civil Rights Act, and that he never said that he was.
This chronic liar is definitely running for prez.
Now, watch the RWs say they agree with him and/or make excuses for his reprehensible position and his lies.
No problem. I fully support Rand, and I support everything he just said. The more that ticks you people off, the more I support him, because he's right.
Politifact's Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it'
Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it' | PolitiFact
Let me know when he rivals the Amateur-in-Chief, the current reigning "Liar of the Year".
I think Paul is disingenuous and a serial panderer...but an Obama supporter calling anyone out for lying is like a fish ridiculing someone for being wet.
Basically?
That wasn't a lie.
President Obama didn't see what was coming. In 2009, insurance companies cobbled together plans they knew wouldn't be up to muster once the full law took effect. It was a pretty crappy thing to do as well.
And in any case? President Obama apologized for this..
Watch: Rand Paul Caught Red-Handed Lying about past Objections to Civil Rights Act | Occupy Democrats
This chronic liar is definitely running for prez.
Now, watch the RWs say they agree with him and/or make excuses for his reprehensible position and his lies.
No problem. I fully support Rand, and I support everything he just said. The more that ticks you people off, the more I support him, because he's right.
its not a case of ticking us off, that's the least of our thinking ... its the idea that people like you refused to admit they are racist ... the fact that we point out your problem people like you think we are mad or we are making it up, or some stupid reason you feel you have pick the right fight to fight... its I dont mind debating smart people. They know the limitations of their position. Its debating stupid people thats hard
Politifact's Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it'
Lie of the Year: 'If you like your health care plan, you can keep it' | PolitiFact
Let me know when he rivals the Amateur-in-Chief, the current reigning "Liar of the Year".
I think Paul is disingenuous and a serial panderer...but an Obama supporter calling anyone out for lying is like a fish ridiculing someone for being wet.
Basically?
That wasn't a lie.
President Obama didn't see what was coming. In 2009, insurance companies cobbled together plans they knew wouldn't be up to muster once the full law took effect. It was a pretty crappy thing to do as well.
And in any case? President Obama apologized for this..
one of the other things some of the policy are policy where the company gives you a list of doctors, these plans were the cheapest plan they had to offer ... when these republicans picked these plans then found out what they picked out without checking into the plan totally, they all started crying obama said you can keep your doctor ... it wasn't our fault the didn't read the policy they picked ...they just look at the dollar signs like the always do then start griping when they find out they fucked up... then blame the president for their stupidity
