Rachel Maddow has this theory...........

Conservativism is infamous for its racist, bigoted anti-immigrant nativism; the right’s unwarranted fear of immigrants and immigration is predicated on the ridiculous lie that immigrants are ‘taking away’ America from ‘real’ Americans, when in fact America is a nation of immigrants and immigration is America’s greatest asset.
yeah yeah…A desire for sovereignty and preservation of culture is racist if white people say it aloud. We totally get it.
America is a nation of DESIRED, LEGAL, VETTED mostly white immigrants…that’s true….and the only reason we aren’t just another dark person filled shithole.
True….white immigrants are Americas greatest asset.
 
yeah yeah…A desire for sovereignty and preservation of culture is racist if white people say it aloud. We totally get it.
America is a nation of DESIRED, LEGAL, VETTED mostly white immigrants…that’s true….and the only reason we aren’t just another dark person filled shithole.
True….white immigrants are Americas greatest asset.
There’s no rational basis for racist, bigoted rightwing anti-immigrant nativism; it’s motivated by ignorance and baseless fear.

And again, racist, bigoted rightwing anti-immigrant nativism is a key component of conservative authoritarianism: to use the unwarranted, irrational fear of immigrants and immigration as ‘justification’ to advance the Republican campaign of lies and rhetoric hostile to our democratic institutions.
 
The rise of Trump is predicated on the crappiness of Obama. What you folks call lies is merely an excuse to ignore the disaster that Obama created.
Meh....Trump is only the latest vehicle of a movement that has been burgeoning since Goldwater....There's a reason the GOP put him out there to get slaughtered, electorally speaking, by the proxy for the assassinated JFK.
 
.......that I thought would be interesting to discuss. Boiled down to its essence it is that Trump is not the essential element animating Trumpery. Trumpery being defined (by me) as the rise of nativism, the advent of power concentrated in the hands of the nation's leader, challenging the prior constitutional order, an isolationist bent, targeting minorities as being responsible for a variety of societal ills, and sloganeering as a substitute for nuanced policy.

She recently did a town hall style meeting with Chris Hayes during which he asked her why it is, in her opinion, that some authoritarian figures in history fail to gain support while others succeed. IOW, can success or failure of these figures be predicted. Her answer was the country, any country, has to be previously receptive to the message being projected. That no one can start from ground zero and orchestrate an authoritarian movement unless citizens in the country, some of them at least, are ready for it.

Probably the best example of this being Germany before Hitler (I'm not comparing Trump to Hitler). The seeds for being receptive to fascism were planted by the onerous terms Germany was forced to submit to after WW I.

So what was happening here that allowed for the sublimated acceptance of, if not desire for, autocracy to bubble to the surface? Technological advances bringing about economic instability? The "browning" of the country causing anxiety among certain factions?

Or is Rachel's theory just wrong?
You are seriously a leftarded shitbag.

If anyone parallels Nazis, it's 2023 Democrats, you stupid shitfuck.

Take guns from people, suppress free speech and any news detrimental to the party? That's Democrats, dumbfuck.
 
There’s no rational basis for racist, bigoted rightwing anti-immigrant nativism; it’s motivated by ignorance and baseless fear
You keep parroting the same tired meaningless bullshit.
People are bigoted and anti ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION because they’ve traveled to the disgusting shitholes (like East Los Angeles) that the illegal cockroaches inhabit…decent people don’t want to live amongst thirdworld minded filth. You wouldn’t understand.
And again, racist, bigoted rightwing anti-immigrant nativism is a key component of conservative authoritarianism: to use the unwarranted, irrational fear of immigrants and immigration as ‘justification’ to advance the Republican campaign of lies and rhetoric hostile to our democratic institutions.
The Right is comprised of good real core Americans…they are about law and order, sovereignty, the preservation of American principles, values, traditions, heritage and culture.
You wouldn’t understand.
 
There’s no rational basis for racist, bigoted rightwing anti-immigrant nativism; it’s motivated by ignorance and baseless fear.

And again, racist, bigoted rightwing anti-immigrant nativism is a key component of conservative authoritarianism: to use the unwarranted, irrational fear of immigrants and immigration as ‘justification’ to advance the Republican campaign of lies and rhetoric hostile to our democratic institutions.

Blacks in Chicago just love all the illegal aliens coming in and taking money
and other resources from the black community.
 
Actually Trump's colorblind policies had better race relations than the racist democrats do now.
Lawlessness won't end well for law breakers...


Trumps colorblind policies were brutal to low level criminals but ignored white collar crime

He used to giggle when he got to execute people
 
So what was happening here that allowed for the sublimated acceptance of, if not desire for, autocracy to bubble to the surface?
The outrageous and sickening amount of violent crime starting in the 1960s and continuing until this moment.
 
Trumps colorblind policies were brutal to low level criminals but ignored white collar crime

He used to giggle when he got to execute people
Trump's DOJ had zero to do with "low-level criminals".
Link that Trump's DOJ ignored "white-collar" crime.

Who all did Trump "execute" besides ISIS and Soleimani?
Link proving your lie.
 
The right’s war on facts and the truth is fundamentally authoritarian, as is the Big Lie.

Indeed, election denialism is a classic example of the fascist tactic of repeating a lie often enough in the hope it’s perceived to be ‘true.’
Maddow also makes the insightful point of how Trumpery coopts language. Trump demonstrably exhibits authoritarian tendencies. His response, calling his detractors authoritarians. Stripping the word of its meaning. A strategy illustrated on this board all the time.
 
The 13 killers on "Death Row" deserved to die. That is a net positive, aka "Justified".
Keeping them alive would be an "injustice" to their victims.

Prior to Trump there had been 3 Federal Executions in the last 60 years
Prior to Trump, there had been no Federal Executions in the last 17 years
Trump killed 13 in his last six months as President

He enjoys it
 
Prior to Trump there had been 3 Federal Executions in the last 60 years
Prior to Trump, there had been no Federal Executions in the last 17 years
Trump killed 13 in his last six months as President. He enjoys it
Killing convicted killers is a net positive. I'm not sure what your point is??
 

Forum List

Back
Top