Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 69,448
- 17,756
- 2,190
What point do you think you made?I don't know enough about the details and president to recommend a sentencing thats for the experts.... I just know the bullet points of his conviction. He was indicted, tried and found guilty of 7 criminal counts including lying to congress, obstructing justice, and witness tampering. Who did he hurt? Since when is hurting somebody conditions to be convicted for crimes. I didn't hurt anybody when I was speeding and not wearing my seatbelt but I was breaking the law. The dude with a knife that wanted to kill Trump didn't hurt anybody but he broke the law... Thats a rather silly question.Instead of us looking them up, why don't you tell us, in your own words, what he did, and who it harmed.Well he was convicted in a court of law on 7 criminal counts. If you don't know what they are then why don't you look them up?NINE YEARS FOR WHAT??????????
Aside from the overblown rhetoric, can somebody explain what, exactly Roger Stone did, and how it affected Life As We Know It?
Bottom line: First offense, non-violent "crime"? NINE YEARS???
Where is THE Democrat who is willing to say that the initial sentencing recommendation was OUTRAGEOUS?
There is no doubt in my mind that these DoJ prosecutors - Never Trumper's to be sure - intended to get such an outrageous sentence for Roger Stone that the President would be FORCED to pardon him, and then have to deal with all the Democrat and Media bullshit that would follow such an act.
"I Double-Dare You to pardon that bastard!"
Remember, in your own words, describe for the forum why it is necessary to punish the man with seven years.
. . . that's what I thought. Thanks.