Read so much more at
The Federalist ^ | 02/13/2020 | Joy Pullmann
Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser proclaimed that 'Justice Ginsburgās feminist legacy teeters on a knifeās edge' because for once she adhered to the text of the law.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is about to lose her feminist card. Ironically, itās for departing from her usual legal schtick to reinforce that what the law says matters, instead of giving authorities license to do whatever the heck they want.
On Monday, Ginsburg reinforced previous assertions that the legal deadline for passing a 1970s and 1980s constitutional amendment to ignore sex distinctions has passed.
āI would like to see a new beginning. Iād like it to start over,ā Ginsburg said about the so-called Equal Rights Amendment Monday.ā Thereās too much controvery about latecomers ā Virginia long after the deadline passed ā plus a number of states have withdrawn their ratification. So if you count a latecomer on the plus side, how can you disregard states that said, āWeāve changed our mindsā?ā
When Congress went through its part of the amendment authorizing process for the ERA, its authorization included a deadline for ratification by the states. Supreme Court precedent says such deadlines for ratification are legally valid. Still, todayās left chooses to ignore the parts of the law they donāt like while using the parts of it they currently find to their liking, or making things up if they donāt like the law at all.
So on Tuesday, Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser, who claims to focus on the Constitution, proclaimed that because of her remarks, āJustice Ginsburgās feminist legacy teeters on a knifeās edge.ā
Nice little feminist legacy you got there, Justice Ginsburg. You wouldnāt want to endanger it by disagreeing with where the left is now, would you? After weāve spent so many years buttering you up so youād do just what we insisted. I mean, weāve put out documentary after biopic after book after museum exhibit hailing you as the feminist hero! And now youād let a little thing like the obvious meaning of multiple laws and court decisions stand in the way of doing what we want?
āGinsburgās comments are likely........
---------------
Hang in there, Ruthie..... Only about 5 years until Trumpās second term is over... You can do that standing on your head.....
The Federalist ^ | 02/13/2020 | Joy Pullmann
Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser proclaimed that 'Justice Ginsburgās feminist legacy teeters on a knifeās edge' because for once she adhered to the text of the law.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is about to lose her feminist card. Ironically, itās for departing from her usual legal schtick to reinforce that what the law says matters, instead of giving authorities license to do whatever the heck they want.
On Monday, Ginsburg reinforced previous assertions that the legal deadline for passing a 1970s and 1980s constitutional amendment to ignore sex distinctions has passed.
āI would like to see a new beginning. Iād like it to start over,ā Ginsburg said about the so-called Equal Rights Amendment Monday.ā Thereās too much controvery about latecomers ā Virginia long after the deadline passed ā plus a number of states have withdrawn their ratification. So if you count a latecomer on the plus side, how can you disregard states that said, āWeāve changed our mindsā?ā
When Congress went through its part of the amendment authorizing process for the ERA, its authorization included a deadline for ratification by the states. Supreme Court precedent says such deadlines for ratification are legally valid. Still, todayās left chooses to ignore the parts of the law they donāt like while using the parts of it they currently find to their liking, or making things up if they donāt like the law at all.
So on Tuesday, Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser, who claims to focus on the Constitution, proclaimed that because of her remarks, āJustice Ginsburgās feminist legacy teeters on a knifeās edge.ā
Nice little feminist legacy you got there, Justice Ginsburg. You wouldnāt want to endanger it by disagreeing with where the left is now, would you? After weāve spent so many years buttering you up so youād do just what we insisted. I mean, weāve put out documentary after biopic after book after museum exhibit hailing you as the feminist hero! And now youād let a little thing like the obvious meaning of multiple laws and court decisions stand in the way of doing what we want?
āGinsburgās comments are likely........
---------------
Hang in there, Ruthie..... Only about 5 years until Trumpās second term is over... You can do that standing on your head.....