Question for those who defend Climate change/ global warming

Which scientists, working carefully and flawlessly, have produced the results that you buy?
 
I hate to break the news to you, but it is not the job of science to PROVE anything.
 
That is correct. You do not prove anything in science. You try to create a model that mimics reality. Have the climate scientists done that? NO. Have the sceptics done than, Hell No! In fact, the sceptics have been wrong 100% of the time. They started with there is no warming. Kept that up until 2000, when the warming was apparent even to the most retarded. Then they switched to 'it's all natural cycles'. But never seem able to name those cycles.

The climate scientists missed by a lot with their models. The rapid decline of the Arctic Ice was not foreseen. The effect of the decline of the Arctic Ice on the Rossby waves in the Jet Stream was not foreseen. You see, the climate is a very complex mechanism, one in which we have yet to understand or even list, all of the parts. Yet the sceptics insist that lack of understandng means that we can throw monkey wrenches into this system with impunity. In my trade, people like this die young.
 
Sorry, the climate change caused by man theory has been repudiated thoroughly. It has now been whittled down to a mantra with little scientific standing.

'Climategate' scientist speaks out : Nature News

Oh yah, so little scientfic standing that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world states that AGW is a fact and a clear and present danger. Pulling one liners out of your ass just makes you look like the source of those one liners.
 
Sorry, the climate change caused by man theory has been repudiated thoroughly. It has now been whittled down to a mantra with little scientific standing.

'Climategate' scientist speaks out : Nature News

Were you actually under the impression that this 3-1/2 year old interview with Phil Jones to which you linked provided the least bit of support for the absurd contention with which you led it?
Sorry chump, that bird has flown.
 
Sorry, the climate change caused by man theory has been repudiated thoroughly. It has now been whittled down to a mantra with little scientific standing.

'Climategate' scientist speaks out : Nature News

Oh yah, so little scientfic standing that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world states that AGW is a fact and a clear and present danger. Pulling one liners out of your ass just makes you look like the source of those one liners.

Hey rocks.. That interview wasnt a one liner. It was an admission of guilt on SEVERALcharges by one of the most celebrated cimate scientists on the planet.. Didnt read it --- didya? If you didnt, youre doomed to remain gullible and stupid about credibility of your heroes.
 
Sorry, the climate change caused by man theory has been repudiated thoroughly. It has now been whittled down to a mantra with little scientific standing.

'Climategate' scientist speaks out : Nature News

Oh yah, so little scientfic standing that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world states that AGW is a fact and a clear and present danger. Pulling one liners out of your ass just makes you look like the source of those one liners.

Hey rocks.. That interview wasnt a one liner. It was an admission of guilt on SEVERALcharges by one of the most celebrated cimate scientists on the planet.. Didnt read it --- didya? If you didnt, youre doomed to remain gullible and stupid about credibility of your heroes.

Let's hear what you got out of it, cause I think that interpretation requires a significant amount of presupposition and outright bias.
 
It's summer in the balmy South Pole and an ice breaker is currently stuck in the ice. A high of zero in the midwest. What global warming?
 
One must conform to the AGW church via the AGW inquisition or forever be labeled a heretic and will be perused as such even though the real science does not support AGW dogma.
 
Oh yah, so little scientfic standing that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world states that AGW is a fact and a clear and present danger. Pulling one liners out of your ass just makes you look like the source of those one liners.

Hey rocks.. That interview wasnt a one liner. It was an admission of guilt on SEVERALcharges by one of the most celebrated cimate scientists on the planet.. Didnt read it --- didya? If you didnt, youre doomed to remain gullible and stupid about credibility of your heroes.

Let's hear what you got out of it, cause I think that interpretation requires a significant amount of presupposition and outright bias.

Presupposition and outright bias is your gig.. You tell me..

:mad:
 
Still waiting for the AGW cultists to post the datasets with source code that prove CO2 drives climate.

So far only propaganda has been posted regardless of thread.
 
10000-year-graph.jpg


In what’s maybe the most comprehensive global temperature reconstruction study to date, scientists at Oregon State University and Harvard University found that the planet today is warmer than it has been during 70 to 80 percent of the time over the last 11,300 years.
Read more at http://www.zmescience.com/research/...eaching-11000-years-peak/#LsSE6cUzJCDhLLKx.99

For the year 2100, nearly every climate model evaluated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows that temperatures will exceed the warmest temperatures during that 11,300-year period known as the Holocene, no matter the greenhouse gas emissions scenario. Now, that’s something to ponder.

This makes sense when you think about the suns forcing being the driver of our climate. NORMAL.
 
Last edited:
10000-year-graph.jpg


In what’s maybe the most comprehensive global temperature reconstruction study to date, scientists at Oregon State University and Harvard University found that the planet today is warmer than it has been during 70 to 80 percent of the time over the last 11,300 years.
Read more at Global temperatures reaching 11,000 years peak

For the year 2100, nearly every climate model evaluated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows that temperatures will exceed the warmest temperatures during that 11,300-year period known as the Holocene, no matter the greenhouse gas emissions scenario. Now, that’s something to ponder.

This makes sense when you think about the suns forcing being the driver of our climate. NORMAL.

Nice posting of a Press Release, how about linking to the actual source.

Matthew will not link because its impossible, all we are allowed to see is the Press Release, you must have Trust, you must have Faith, you must be a BELIEVER, accept the Press Release as the Word of God!!!!!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top