Patriot911
Rookie
- Banned
- #21
Is that all you have? Whining about your ignorant misconceptions? Sheesh. I know truthtards are lame, but you're rewriting the book!Think I give a fuck what YOU think? Once again you're wrong. I can't help it you can't respond to my debunking of your lame shit without lying your ass off. Like claiming me stating Kevin McPadden lied his ass off and then backing it up with facts is equal to claiming all people who heard explosions are lying. That was a good one!
And I'm not surprised you find the writings of your intellectual superiors gibberish. That is usually how it works. People with higher intelligence can understand those with "difficulties" like you, but the reverse is not always true. ;-)
You seem curiously fascinated with asses, homosexuals and retardation. In fact, it's really all you seem to talk about.
Wrong dipshit. The "Indian" intel was proven false ages ago. Why is it truthtards can't even look at the political climate and see when one country is out to slander another? As for the FBI, I talked to Dennis Lormel, the guy behind the investigation into funding. He was more than happy to inform me that neither the Pakistan government nor Mahmoud Ahmed were sources of funding or had anything to do with the transfer of funds. The funds started off in the UAE and moved THROUGH Pakistan, but not on the orders of anyone in the Pakistani governement, including Ahmed.JiggsCasey said:In any crime, following the money trail is essential to solving the case. Once again, we know exactly who paid the hijackers, as confirmed by the FBI and Indian intel.
First off, he was a foreign diplomat and is not a citizen of the United States. There isn't anywhere near enough evidence to warrant trying to extradite him to the US for questioning. Second, there is no evidence beyond a slanderous Indian article that points to Ahmed being involved. And IF the Indian article were true, why hasn't India pursued it? It would be a perfect opportunity for them to give their enemy a black eye in front of the United States. Of course, that makes too much sense so you will run away from that point like you do the rest.JiggsCasey said:Why was this man never apprehended for questioning?
So now the CIA is responsible for creating the Pakistani intelligence agency?!? If the CIA was involved, don't you think they would have been a little more careful in having their lapdog give out orders? Of course they would!JiggsCasey said:Why was he allowed to fade quietly into retirement after a long career working in the CIA-created ISI, never to be heard from again?
Read above. You don't pull someone in for questioning based on the lies of an enemy state that have no real backing. Well, since you suffer from paranoid delusions, I guess you would have him brought in for questioning and then not believe a thing he said. It is the truthtard way!JiggsCasey said:Heck, why was he IN the united states during the attack talking with Senators and members of the NSA and not questioned?
One has to have a reason to bring someone in for questioning, ESPECIALLY when doing so would have international repercussions.JiggsCasey said:Coincidence theorists' BEST response to that question has always been: "it's not easy to just capture foreign officials."
Try there is no evidence. That seems to be the one reason you shitheads always miss.JiggsCasey said:LOL ... Not, "he didn't do it" or "it was just a coincidence." ... Just "we couldn't get to him." ...