Published, Peer Reviewed Empirical Evidence of AGW

[SSDD]

Did you factor in the RESOLUTION range of Proxy data to match up with 1950-2018 data?

Snicker...…….

You don't expect that he even knows what you mean do you? After all, he posted up a hockey stick for Pete's sake. Who does that any more? Alarmists will have that bit of pseudoscience hanging around their necks like a dead albatross for 100 years...and they deserve it.

 

[Sunsettommy]

How about "If AGW shoved itself up his ass he'd pretend it wasn't there". Better?

How about showing us that Tropospheric "hot spot", the IPCC said is there from 20 years ago?

Snicker...…………….

 

[Weatherman2020]

SOLAR MAX vs SOLAR MIN
We have nothing to do with it. It is a scam by the UN to redistribute our wealth and nothing more. When they come right out and admit it, we need to listen.....

We have everything to do with it. It is not a scam to redistribute our wealth. AGW is quite real and a real threat. Attitudes like yours are going to cost us and our children for generations to come trillions and trillions of dollars. Even if all you're worried about is your money, I strongly suggest you look at the evidence and likely results of AGW.

Ask any scientist why historical ice ages have come and gone and they’ll point to the sun.

What does every climate model ignore?
Yeah, solar influence.

 

[Sunsettommy]

How about you stop lying asshole?

We all know that you are full of shit skidmark,,,Everyone here knows that if you had actually found a single piece of observed measured evidence I asked for, there would be no escaping it..you would post it everywhere and crow like the cock of the walk rather than slink around mewling trying to save some face...

But keep talking..the more you mewl the more opportunity I have to point out what a loser you are and how you couldn't find even a single piece of observed, measured evidence to support your claims.

Please explain how a published, peer reviewed, paper is not evidence.

More evidence of your ignorance, since MANY published, peer reviewed papers gets retracted because they are Junk or fraud!

Retraction Watch

Surely you can't be that naïve?

 

[Crepitus]

How about you stop lying asshole?

We all know that you are full of shit skidmark,,,Everyone here knows that if you had actually found a single piece of observed measured evidence I asked for, there would be no escaping it..you would post it everywhere and crow like the cock of the walk rather than slink around mewling trying to save some face...

But keep talking..the more you mewl the more opportunity I have to point out what a loser you are and how you couldn't find even a single piece of observed, measured evidence to support your claims.

Please explain how a published, peer reviewed, paper is not evidence.

More evidence of your ignorance, since MANY published, peer reviewed papers gets retracted because they are Junk or fraud!

Retraction Watch

Surely you can't be that naïve?

Thanks for proving my secondary point.

 

[The Irish Ram]

SOLAR MAX vs SOLAR MIN
We have nothing to do with it. It is a scam by the UN to redistribute our wealth and nothing more. When they come right out and admit it, we need to listen.....

We have everything to do with it. It is not a scam to redistribute our wealth. AGW is quite real and a real threat. Attitudes like yours are going to cost us and our children for generations to come trillions and trillions of dollars. Even if all you're worried about is your money, I strongly suggest you look at the evidence and likely results of AGW.

THIS MAN IS TALKING TO YOU. HE KNOWS MORE ABOUT IT THAN YOU DO. He wants you to stop deluding yourself:

United Nations climate official Ottmar Edenhofer:

"One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole," said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.
"We redistribute de facto< (IN REALITY) the world's wealth by climate policy," said Edenhofer.

Could they make it any clearer for you? Why, yes. They can. Here they are telling you the REASON for the scam:

Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change:

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution...
This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history."

The plan is to allow Third World countries to emit as much carbon dioxide as they wish -- because, as Edenhofer said, "in order to get rich one has to burn coal, oil or gas" -- while at the same time restricting emissions in advanced nations. This will, of course, choke economic growth in developed nations, but they deserve that fate as they "have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community,"

^^^^^ Read that last paragraph, over and over until you understand that this is a redistribution of our wealth and fossil fuels
to whomever wants to use them to "get rich" while we are restricted from "advancing" any further.

Every time you hear someone say that global warming is real, I want you to remember what you just read here, until you too can respond with, "free yourself from the illusion..."

 

[skookerasbil]

SOLAR MAX vs SOLAR MIN
We have nothing to do with it. It is a scam by the UN to redistribute our wealth and nothing more. When they come right out and admit it, we need to listen.....

We have everything to do with it. It is not a scam to redistribute our wealth. AGW is quite real and a real threat. Attitudes like yours are going to cost us and our children for generations to come trillions and trillions of dollars. Even if all you're worried about is your money, I strongly suggest you look at the evidence and likely results of AGW.

Ask any scientist why historical ice ages have come and gone and they’ll point to the sun.

What does every climate model ignore?
Yeah, solar influence.

Exactly.....these bozos claim the sun had zero effect. Thousands of scientists call bs on that of course....and doy....offuckingcourse the sun factors into the climate as do multiple other factors.

 

[Weatherman2020]

How about you stop lying asshole?

We all know that you are full of shit skidmark,,,Everyone here knows that if you had actually found a single piece of observed measured evidence I asked for, there would be no escaping it..you would post it everywhere and crow like the cock of the walk rather than slink around mewling trying to save some face...

But keep talking..the more you mewl the more opportunity I have to point out what a loser you are and how you couldn't find even a single piece of observed, measured evidence to support your claims.

Please explain how a published, peer reviewed, paper is not evidence.

More evidence of your ignorance, since MANY published, peer reviewed papers gets retracted because they are Junk or fraud!

Retraction Watch

Surely you can't be that naïve?

Just had that one group get 24 fake papers published in scientific journals just to show how easily fooled the system is.

 

[SSDD]

How about you stop lying asshole?

We all know that you are full of shit skidmark,,,Everyone here knows that if you had actually found a single piece of observed measured evidence I asked for, there would be no escaping it..you would post it everywhere and crow like the cock of the walk rather than slink around mewling trying to save some face...

But keep talking..the more you mewl the more opportunity I have to point out what a loser you are and how you couldn't find even a single piece of observed, measured evidence to support your claims.

Please explain how a published, peer reviewed, paper is not evidence.

More evidence of your ignorance, since MANY published, peer reviewed papers gets retracted because they are Junk or fraud!

Retraction Watch

Surely you can't be that naïve?

Thanks for proving my secondary point.

Your primary point failed miserably...and I didn't see anything that looked like a secondary point...care to elucidate?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Ahhh....they had 8 years to do something under Soetero and didnt do dick. Because the public doesnt care about climate change.....some stand in front of a banner and piss and moan but that is the extent of anybody caring.

(CNN)President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order curbing the federal government's enforcement of climate regulations, a move that represents a sharp reversal from his predecessor's position.
The Obama administration put in place a number of programs that attempted to address the impact of climate change, including rising sea levels and temperatures.
Trump said those actions harmed American businesses.

6 Obama climate policies that Trump orders change - CNNPolitics

Exactly why should tax money go into regulations aimed at reducing human induced climate change, when there isn't the first piece of observed, measured evidence supporting the claim that we are altering the climate?

How would you feel about regulations aimed at reducing the terrors inflicted upon humanity by leprechauns? Would you not ask for some actual observational evidence of leprechauns before you were willing to see money spent on the issue?


Leprechauns are every bit as real as man made global climate change.

What are your measurements that prove that?

Thousands of billions of dollars spent and not one piece of observed, measured evidence that supports, the AGW hypothesis over natural variability....not one piece of observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent relationship between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere, and not a single peer reviewed published paper in which the hypothetical warming, supposedly caused by our burning of hydrocarbon fuels has been empirically, measured, quantified, and ascribed to so called greenhouse gasses.

Now if you think the money has not been wasted, provide a single bit of data, or a paper that satisfies any one of the three statements above...otherwise, it is clear that the money has been wasted as there is nothing real to show for it...except perhaps for homes situated in fashionable neighborhoods, expensive personal automobiles owned by "scientists" who not so long ago, thought they were on easy street if they could land a spot on a local news network predicting the weather....except most of those climate experts couldn't pass the hard science curricula required to be a meteorologist and instead accept a soft science degree in climatology.

The OP links a 1500+ page report, chock full of measurements and trends reflecting the conclusions drawn. MIT, NASA, the ESA and scientific organizations around the world have taken millions of measurements and readings, reaching peer-reviewed conclusions regarding ACG.

Deniers deny. It's what they do. They claim a vast conspiracy, and they're largely the same Limabaugh-listeners who think Soros is behind Central American caravan (helping Trump rouse the base), that the mail-bomber was a false-flag operation, and more. Facts are irrelevant to them.

What do you think explains the spike in CO2 beginning in the mid-20th Century?

And yet when placed into long term perspective your alarmisim is shown invalid an pure BS...

 

[Hossfly]

CNN News Alert!

This just in.....

 

[Old Rocks]

SOLAR MAX vs SOLAR MIN
We have nothing to do with it. It is a scam by the UN to redistribute our wealth and nothing more. When they come right out and admit it, we need to listen.....

We have everything to do with it. It is not a scam to redistribute our wealth. AGW is quite real and a real threat. Attitudes like yours are going to cost us and our children for generations to come trillions and trillions of dollars. Even if all you're worried about is your money, I strongly suggest you look at the evidence and likely results of AGW.

Ask any scientist why historical ice ages have come and gone and they’ll point to the sun.

What does every climate model ignore?
Yeah, solar influence.

No, they do not. They point to the Milankovic Cycles.

 

[Old Rocks]

CNN News Alert!

This just in.....




View attachment 226807

Amazing what some stupid asses think is relevant to the subject of this thread.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Hundreds of open access journals accept fake science paper

Fake Science Paper About 'Star Trek' and Warp 10 Was Accepted by 'Predatory Journals'

Science journals publish insanely stupid, hoaxed "gender studies" science papers submitted to determine how insane "libtard science" has become

 

[SSDD]

Hundreds of open access journals accept fake science paper

Fake Science Paper About 'Star Trek' and Warp 10 Was Accepted by 'Predatory Journals'

Science journals publish insanely stupid, hoaxed "gender studies" science papers submitted to determine how insane "libtard science" has become

Science is skirting on its own repeat of the dark ages...the willingness to accept computer models as reality can simply never lead to enlightenment....computer models are based entirely on the knowledge of the programmer...new knowledge isn't going to come out of programs based on old knowledge...or wild assed guesses about what reality might be like...

 

[Hossfly]

CNN News Alert!

This just in.....




View attachment 226807

Amazing what some stupid asses think is relevant to the subject of this thread.

The subject of this thread doesn't take into account that nothing in the world can or will do anything about global warming/climate change as long as Old Sol is in our solar system.

 

[Crick]

The subject of this thread doesn't take into account that nothing in the world can or will do anything about global warming/climate change as long as Old Sol is in our solar system.

That is completely incorrect. Increased radiant heating dwarfs changes in solar insolation.

 

[Crick]

Hundreds of open access journals accept fake science paper

Fake Science Paper About 'Star Trek' and Warp 10 Was Accepted by 'Predatory Journals'

Science journals publish insanely stupid, hoaxed "gender studies" science papers submitted to determine how insane "libtard science" has become

Science is skirting on its own repeat of the dark ages...the willingness to accept computer models as reality can simply never lead to enlightenment....computer models are based entirely on the knowledge of the programmer...new knowledge isn't going to come out of programs based on old knowledge...or wild assed guesses about what reality might be like...

Tell you what Shit. We'll let you take over the conduct of all scientific research on the planet, but in accordance with your multiply expressed views, you will not be allowed to use computer models to make predictions or projections.

Let us know how that works out for you fool.

 

[Crick]

Hundreds of open access journals accept fake science paper

Fake Science Paper About 'Star Trek' and Warp 10 Was Accepted by 'Predatory Journals'

Science journals publish insanely stupid, hoaxed "gender studies" science papers submitted to determine how insane "libtard science" has become

Got some links for that dubious factoid?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The subject of this thread doesn't take into account that nothing in the world can or will do anything about global warming/climate change as long as Old Sol is in our solar system.

That is completely incorrect. Increased radiant heating dwarfs changes in solar insolation.

How much additional heat is generated by increasing CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM?