- Thread starter
- #81
And yet, mainstream science has provided mountains and yet, you continue to lie straight to our faces about it. Asshole.
You lie like a rug skidmatk...but do feel free to prove that I am wrong and that you aren’t a bald faced liar by posting a single bit of observed measured evidence that challenges my assertions.
You won’t though...and I can say that with perfect confidence that you won’t because no such evidence exists. The best you can do is make the same old bullshit claim again...there certainly is no danger of you proving me wrong.
Lets hear you say it skidmatk...baaahhhhh
Given that you reject basic physics concepts, such as backradiation, IR heating of the atmosphere, the Second Law of Thermodynamics and others, there is no point in arguing with you. What the world's scientists understand to be solid evidence, you will simply reject out of hand. I stand by my original assertion. You're an idiot, a liar and an asshole.
If anyone wants to read about evidence that human activity is causing global warming, they should peruse "The Physical Science Basis" by Working Group I of the IPCC. It may be viewed and downloaded via links in this thread's top post or just google the name. In response to SSDD's (Same Shit Different Day) claim that no empirical evidence existed, I posted the executive summaries to chapters 2 and 3 (observations of the Earth's surface, atmosphere and oceans) but it was booted as a copyright violation. I then started this thread with a link to this material in the top post. The reference sections at the end of those chapters list the hundreds and hundreds of peer reviewed studies from which the observational data were assembled. SSDD's claim are blatant nonsense. His positions on several basic physical principles are bizarre, unsupportable and absurd. He has no science education nor do any of his supporters at this site. I strongly recommend ignoring the man and read up on some actual research conducted by actual scientists with actual educations in these topics.