Published, Peer Reviewed Empirical Evidence of AGW

Crick

Gold Member
May 10, 2014
28,021
5,344
290
N/A
http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paolo, Delhi, Mexico City

Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013-2473, USA

www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107661820
© Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 2013

Printed in the United States of America

A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-107-05799-1 hardback ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0 paperback

Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.

Please use the following reference to the whole report:
IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)].
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.

The title of the work at this link is "The Physical Science Basis". Chapters 2 and 3 (ppg 159 and 218) contain observations from the surface, the atmosphere and the ocean supporting the conclusions of the assessment report. These are assessment of hundreds of published, peer-reviewed studies. If anyone here is tempted to take the opinion of the several deniers, who claim no evidence of AGW exist, please review these two chapters if nothing else.
 
The atmosphere is warming the deep ocean...er, or something. We have consensus
 
http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paolo, Delhi, Mexico City

Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013-2473, USA

www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107661820
© Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 2013

Printed in the United States of America

A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-107-05799-1 hardback ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0 paperback

Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.

Please use the following reference to the whole report:
IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)].
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.

The title of the work at this link is "The Physical Science Basis". Chapters 2 and 3 (ppg 159 and 218) contain observations from the surface, the atmosphere and the ocean supporting the conclusions of the assessment report. These are assessment of hundreds of published, peer-reviewed studies. If anyone here is tempted to take the opinion of the several deniers, who claim no evidence of AGW exist, please review these two chapters if nothing else.

So once again crick...point out in that steaming pile:

A single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...

A single piece of observed measured evidence which establishes a coherent relationship between the absorption of IR by a gas and warming in the atmosphere.

A single peer reviewed paper in which the hypothetical warming caused by our use of hydrocarbons has been measured, quantified, and ascribed to so called greenhouse gasses...

Either it is there or it isn't...and by now, we both know that it isn't. When you start listing publications, but don't bring the evidence here, NEWSFLASH....everyone knows that it isn't there and you are just trying to mewl your way into saving some of the very large face you lost today...you are laughing stock...congratulations.
 
SOLAR MAX vs SOLAR MIN
We have nothing to do with it. It is a scam by the UN to redistribute our wealth and nothing more. When they come right out and admit it, we need to listen.....


We have everything to do with it. It is not a scam to redistribute our wealth. AGW is quite real and a real threat. Attitudes like yours are going to cost us and our children for generations to come trillions and trillions of dollars. Even if all you're worried about is your money, I strongly suggest you look at the evidence and likely results of AGW.
 
Pal review....GIGO.

The five IPCC assessment reports have been based on tens of thousands of peer reviewed studies. Are you suggesting they are all the product of Pal Review? If so, you're just as stupid as you already seem to be.
 
SOLAR MAX vs SOLAR MIN
We have nothing to do with it. It is a scam by the UN to redistribute our wealth and nothing more. When they come right out and admit it, we need to listen.....


We have everything to do with it. It is not a scam to redistribute our wealth. AGW is quite real and a real threat. Attitudes like yours are going to cost us and our children for generations to come trillions and trillions of dollars. Even if all you're worried about is your money, I strongly suggest you look at the evidence and likely results of AGW.

It will cost gazillions of dollars to do what the AGW crowd wants...fuck that and fuck you, you sleep half naked in a teepee and hunt buffalo..I won't


.
 
How about you stop lying asshole?

We all know that you are full of shit skidmark,,,Everyone here knows that if you had actually found a single piece of observed measured evidence I asked for, there would be no escaping it..you would post it everywhere and crow like the cock of the walk rather than slink around mewling trying to save some face...

But keep talking..the more you mewl the more opportunity I have to point out what a loser you are and how you couldn't find even a single piece of observed, measured evidence to support your claims.
 
Pal review....GIGO.

The five IPCC assessment reports have been based on tens of thousands of peer reviewed studies. Are you suggesting they are all the product of Pal Review? If so, you're just as stupid as you already seem to be.

And yet, there isn't a single one in which the hypothetical warming due to our contribution of so called greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere has been measured, quantified, and ascribed to so called greenhouse gasses...not a single one.
 
Pal review....GIGO.

The five IPCC assessment reports have been based on tens of thousands of peer reviewed studies. Are you suggesting they are all the product of Pal Review? If so, you're just as stupid as you already seem to be.
All of your peer reviewed papers are thrown out by POLITICIANS and thus the output is pure political horse crap.. Had you read what you have posted in other threads you wouldn't be posting this drivel any longer.. The IPCC ADMITS that its basic premise is false... No heat driving the atmospheric hot spot... IT does not exist!

This is a Charade... nothing more..
 
How about you stop lying asshole?

We all know that you are full of shit skidmark,,,Everyone here knows that if you had actually found a single piece of observed measured evidence I asked for, there would be no escaping it..you would post it everywhere and crow like the cock of the walk rather than slink around mewling trying to save some face...

But keep talking..the more you mewl the more opportunity I have to point out what a loser you are and how you couldn't find even a single piece of observed, measured evidence to support your claims.
Please explain how a published, peer reviewed, paper is not evidence.
 
http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paolo, Delhi, Mexico City

Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013-2473, USA

www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107661820
© Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 2013

Printed in the United States of America

A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-107-05799-1 hardback ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0 paperback

Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.

Please use the following reference to the whole report:
IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)].
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.

The title of the work at this link is "The Physical Science Basis". Chapters 2 and 3 (ppg 159 and 218) contain observations from the surface, the atmosphere and the ocean supporting the conclusions of the assessment report. These are assessment of hundreds of published, peer-reviewed studies. If anyone here is tempted to take the opinion of the several deniers, who claim no evidence of AGW exist, please review these two chapters if nothing else.
Don't let 'em get to ya. If global warming personified moved into their house and lived in their couch for a week these fools would still deny it.
 
[
Please explain how a published, peer reviewed, paper is not evidence.

Evidence for what? There are plenty of peer reviewed published papers that provide evidence that the climate is changing....but no one is disputing that. Everyone knows that the climate changes.

What there isn't is a single peer reviewed published paper in which the hypothetical warming caused by our activities is measured, quantified, and blamed on so called greenhouse gasses...not a single one....

So there is evidence that the climate changes...big deal...it isn't as if you need to spend much money to figure that one out...but no observed, measured evidence whatsoever that we are causing any change at all.
 
http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paolo, Delhi, Mexico City

Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013-2473, USA

www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107661820
© Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 2013

Printed in the United States of America

A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-107-05799-1 hardback ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0 paperback

Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.

Please use the following reference to the whole report:
IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)].
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp.

The title of the work at this link is "The Physical Science Basis". Chapters 2 and 3 (ppg 159 and 218) contain observations from the surface, the atmosphere and the ocean supporting the conclusions of the assessment report. These are assessment of hundreds of published, peer-reviewed studies. If anyone here is tempted to take the opinion of the several deniers, who claim no evidence of AGW exist, please review these two chapters if nothing else.
Don't let 'em get to ya. If global warming personified moved into their house and lived in their couch for a week these fools would still deny it.

It is clear that you don't even know what the discussion is about...it isn't about whether the climate is changing or not...it is about whether mankind is causing it.
 
How about "If AGW shoved itself up his ass he'd pretend it wasn't there". Better?
 

Forum List

Back
Top