PROOF of Stolen Election

[Tampa_Bay]

Now, there are many ways, methods, places where the election was stolen, all with mountains of circumstantial evidence, but here is just one with PROOF, and all we need is one, correct?

BEFORE YOU READ the link below, you must be honest enough to understand the underlying truth that is NOT mentioned in this story: No court has the authority to break the law. Courts are appointed to apply and enforce the law, not break it. When courts purposely break the law to advance a political agenda, we no longer have a country.

So, in Pennsylvania, voting date deadlines were illegally extended. Trump sued them. The court stepped in and supported the extension, in total violation of the law which states that an act of the legislative body is required to extend the deadline, not just an executive order.

So, in the article below you will see that the deadline was in fact extended, that Trump sued, and that the court ruled in favor of the extension - those facts are verified in the story. What you will not see is that the court ruling directly violated the very law that Trump was seeking to appeal to.

If you Democrats think this is bullshit, then let me remind you of the many many times that YOU said the courts violated the law with an illegal ruling, like Citizens United or Bush v. Gore. Democrats have already established, according to them, that courts make illegal rulings.

This is another one.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court extends state's mail ballot deadline

The battleground state will now count mailed ballots that are postmarked by Election Day and received by Nov. 6.

www.politico.com

 

[Tampa_Bay]

Next, we have the sheer cowardice of SCOTUS:
The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a dispute over whether absentee ballots received up to three days after Election Day in Pennsylvania should have been counted in the 2020 presidential election

Supreme Court won't hear 2020 election case that questioned some Pennsylvania ballots

Three conservative justices on the high court said they would have heard the Pennsylvania election cases, one vote shy of the four needed.

www.usatoday.com

 

[elektra]

The Democrats promise to spend tens of trillions of dollars while the Republicans will only spend trillions.

It is hard to overcome that kind of greed. It is hard to defeat the power of money.

 

[Lesh]

Now, there are many ways, methods, places where the election was stolen, all with mountains of circumstantial evidence, but here is just one with PROOF, and all we need is one, correct?

BEFORE YOU READ the link below, you must be honest enough to understand the underlying truth that is NOT mentioned in this story: No court has the authority to break the law. Courts are appointed to apply and enforce the law, not break it. When courts purposely break the law to advance a political agenda, we no longer have a country.

So, in Pennsylvania, voting date deadlines were illegally extended. Trump sued them. The court stepped in and supported the extension, in total violation of the law which states that an act of the legislative body is required to extend the deadline, not just an executive order.

So, in the article below you will see that the deadline was in fact extended, that Trump sued, and that the court ruled in favor of the extension - those facts are verified in the story. What you will not see is that the court ruling directly violated the very law that Trump was seeking to appeal to.

If you Democrats think this is bullshit, then let me remind you of the many many times that YOU said the courts violated the law with an illegal ruling, like Citizens United or Bush v. Gore. Democrats have already established, according to them, that courts make illegal rulings.

This is another one.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court extends state's mail ballot deadline

The battleground state will now count mailed ballots that are postmarked by Election Day and received by Nov. 6.

www.politico.com

So a Court extended mail in ballot rules and that is your supposed fraud?

They were legal ballots cast by legal voters. And when a court rules...that makes it legal until such time as that ruling is changed and then only going forward.

FAIL junior

 

[Mac1958]

So a Court extended mail in ballot rules and that is your supposed fraud?
They were legal ballots cast by legal voters. And when a court rules...that makes it legal until such time as that ruling is changed and then only going forward.

This is the kind of stuff that 60+ judges, including Trump-appointed judges, tossed out.

But to the rubes, they're solid evidence that millions of votes were fabricated or changed. Clear as day. There you go. It's so obvious!

It would be fascinating to see a mental schematic of how they came to that conclusion. But sadly, there's just nothing that can be done at this point.

 

[Tampa_Bay]

So a Court extended mail in ballot rules and that is your supposed fraud?

Apparently you cannot comprehend basic English. Try reading the post again. Or beter yet, shut the fuck up. All you do here is lie anyways.

This is the kind of stuff that 60+ judges, including Trump-appointed judges, tossed out.

You're another 100% lying sack of shit. 60 judges did not toss this case out.

 

[Lesh]

Apparently you cannot comprehend basic English. Try reading the post again. Or beter yet, shut the fuck up. All you do here is lie anyways.

I read it nube...and responded appropriately

 

[Tampa_Bay]

I read it nube

And I read all your defenses of pedophiles and groomers. Now fuck off. You didn't read shit, and if you did you sure as fuck did not understand it.

 

[Lesh]

And I read all your defenses of pedophiles and groomers. Now fuck off. You didn't read shit, and if you did you sure as fuck did not understand it.

Stop with the cynical and nonsensical pedophile accusations

That appears to be your only means of debate. Insane personal attacks

 

[Tampa_Bay]

Now, there are many ways, methods, places where the election was stolen, all with mountains of circumstantial evidence, but here is just one with PROOF, and all we need is one, correct?

BEFORE YOU READ the link below, you must be honest enough to understand the underlying truth that is NOT mentioned in this story: No court has the authority to break the law. Courts are appointed to apply and enforce the law, not break it. When courts purposely break the law to advance a political agenda, we no longer have a country.

So, in Pennsylvania, voting date deadlines were illegally extended. Trump sued them. The court stepped in and supported the extension, in total violation of the law which states that an act of the legislative body is required to extend the deadline, not just an executive order.

So, in the article below you will see that the deadline was in fact extended, that Trump sued, and that the court ruled in favor of the extension - those facts are verified in the story. What you will not see is that the court ruling directly violated the very law that Trump was seeking to appeal to.

If you Democrats think this is bullshit, then let me remind you of the many many times that YOU said the courts violated the law with an illegal ruling, like Citizens United or Bush v. Gore. Democrats have already established, according to them, that courts make illegal rulings.

This is another one.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court extends state's mail ballot deadline

The battleground state will now count mailed ballots that are postmarked by Election Day and received by Nov. 6.

www.politico.com

Here are just a few examples of how determinative the voter fraud in Pennsylvania was:

• 71,893 mail-in ballots were returned after Nov. 3, 2020, at 8 p.m., according to Audit the Vote PA. None of these should have been counted according to the U.S. Constitution and the state Legislature, which didn’t approve this change.

• 10,515 mail-in votes from people who do not exist on the Pennsylvania voter rolls at all.

• 120,000 excess voters are not yet accounted for by the Pennsylvania Department of State—far more votes than voters!

• From 2016 to 2020, during my term as president, Republicans out-registered Democrats 21 to 1. This translated to a 659,145-vote lead at 12:38 a.m. on election night, with “Trump” up a full 15 points.

• Hundreds of thousands of votes were unlawfully counted in secret, in defiance of a
court order, while Republican poll watchers were thrown out of buildings where voting took place.

• 39,771 people who registered to vote after the Oct. 19, 2020, deadline, still voted in the 2020 election—simply not allowed.

Highly respected Audit the Vote PA found numerous data integrity problems the Pennsylvania Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system, including:

• 305,874 voters were removed from the rolls after the election on Nov. 3rd.

• 51,792 voters with inactive voter registrations at the end of October 2020 nevertheless voted.

• 57,000 duplicate registrations.

• 55,823 voters who were backfilled into the SURE system.

• 58,261 first-time voters 70 years and older.

• 39,911 people who were added to voter rolls while under 17 years of age.

• 17,000 mail-in ballots sent to addresses outside of Pennsylvania.

• Another analysis of Montgomery County, Pa., found 98% of the eligible voting population in the county was already registered to vote—not possible.

• A canvass of Montgomery County has identified 78,000 phantom voters, with roughly 30% of respondents unaware that there are people registered and voting from their address.

• One nursing home in Lancaster County had 690 registrations and an extremely high turnout rate of 85% in 2020, while nursing homes were closed due to Covid. One of these residents said she had not voted in the past 3 years, but had a mail-in ballot cast in her name.

• 25,000 ballots were requested from nursing homes at the exact same time.

• Numerous reports and sworn affidavits attested to poll watcher intimidation and harassment, many by brute force.

• Attorney General Bill Barr ordered U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain to stand down and not investigate election irregularities.

• Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $17 million to interfere in the Pennsylvania election, including $5.5 million on “ballot processing equipment” in Philadelphia and $552,000 for drop boxes where the voting pattern was not possible.

And so much more! This is why Democrats and the Fake News Media do not want a full forensic audit in Pennsylvania. In reality, 80,555 ballots are nothing when there is this much corruption or voter irregularities.


Written by Donald J. Trump, Palm Beach, Fla.

 

[sparky]

PROOF, and all we need is one, correct?

Yes, but it's not effective in a broken system

I mean, we could have had Putin bringing Hillary to a screaming orgasm on national TV, and nobody in DC would bust a move....

~S~

 

[Tampa_Bay]

Yes, but it's not effective in a broken system

If its that broken then its time for a real insurrection.

 

[elektra]

So a Court extended mail in ballot rules and that is your supposed fraud?

They were legal ballots cast by legal voters. And when a court rules...that makes it legal until such time as that ruling is changed and then only going forward.

FAIL junior

Technically, the law was changed by the governor, with support of the courts. That is unconstitutional. Period.

Article 2, section 1, clause 2 states only the legislature can make and our change election laws.

Separation of powers is what that is called.

The courts (jucicial) can't make or change law.
The governor (executive) can't make or change law

The legislative branch does.
212
article 2, section 1, clause 2
212

 

[Tampa_Bay]

Op-Ed: Election Fraud & the Destruction of our Republic - Senator Mastriano

There is election fraud in Pennsylvania and denying it won’t make it go away.

senatormastriano.com

Op-Ed: Election Fraud & the Destruction of our Republic
Posted on Dec 18, 2020

There is election fraud in Pennsylvania and denying it won’t make it go away.

The day before Thanksgiving, along with Senator David Argall, I hosted the Senate Majority Policy Committee hearing in Gettysburg where hours of testimony was presented, reviewed, and vetted.

We heard eyewitness after eyewitness, who personally experienced their rights being violated. It’s not just the rights of the witnesses that were violated; if a canvass observer is not permitted meaningful observation of ballot processing, the rights of every voter who cast their ballot is being violated.

During the hearing, expert witnesses testified to statistical anomalies, such as quantities of ballots that counting machines could not physically process within a required timeframe. Another witness testified that an election worker was plugging flash drives into voting machines for no stated purpose.

Even after the hearing, which commanded the nation’s attention, the far left and members of the media refused to acknowledge there is widespread election fraud in Pennsylvania. We are living in the storied tale of the Emperor’s New Clothes. What is so plain and obvious that even a child can see it is being denied wholesale.

After the hearing, I introduced a measure that would allow the Pennsylvania legislature to exercise its Constitutional authority of appointing presidential electors. For the legislature to pass the resolution, Governor Wolf needed to call a special session and he refused.

Sadly, the Governor has routinely dismissed allegations of election fraud. Instead of choosing to serve all Pennsylvanians, and caring enough to ensure that our elections were indeed free and fair, he has chosen loyalty to partisan politics.

I also signed an amicus to the lawsuit by Congressman Mike Kelly that seeks to strike down the voting reform Act 77 of 2019. As originally written, Act 77 had many safeguards in place to ensure voting integrity. But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court illegally re-wrote the law allowing for mail-in ballots to be counted, even if received three days after the election and without any postmark.

The court also ruled that ballots without signature verification would be counted. The Pandora’s Box of voter fraud was thus unleashed in Pennsylvania.

The United States Constitution delegates the responsibility of passing election law to the General Assembly, not the courts. Unfortunately, this is not the first time the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has re-written election law.

In 2018, they dismissed Congressional District maps and hired a professional from California to draw their own.

Further, Commonwealth Secretary Boockvar ignored Act 77 safeguards and issued her own conflicting guidance October 23 and November 2.

The Secretary directed certain counties to cure defective ballots, which allowed voting officials in Democrat-controlled counties to correct ballots so that they could be counted.

This is a direct violation of the equal protection law and was a partisan maneuver to favor Democrat candidates in the general election. If this is not voter suppression, is there a better example?

I also signed onto the Pennsylvania Senate’s amicus brief in support of the lawsuit filed by Texas. The lawsuit argues that non-legislative actors amended Pennsylvania election law and this is a violation of the United States Constitution. This violation resulted in Pennsylvania voters being treated inconsistently and these voting irregularities undermined the integrity of the election.

This is a strong case in that the PA Supreme Court and the Wolf administration rewrote Act 77 and transformed it into something that we did not vote for.

We are the United States of America. When one state conducts an election filled with irregularities, fraud, abuse and lawbreaking, every other state has standing! If the election only concerned our state row offices, I would agree with the Supreme Court. But the President of our nation affects each state and each citizen. If Pennsylvania’s election is fraudulent, every state’s election is also tainted.

The fourteenth amendment gives equal protection to each citizen. If another state is depriving its citizens of a free and fair election, it is depriving every citizen of that right.

Election fraud is real and prevalent, and it won’t go away by refusing to believe it exists. Yet, despite the evidence and witnesses at my hearing, the media refuses to conduct a serious investigation. Perhaps the biased press likes the outcome of the vote?

However, this does not change the material fact that cheating and fraud happened in our state. Despite the evidence, our Governor and Secretary of State likewise refuse to investigate, because they too like the outcome as it stands. It is appalling that elected officials and the mainstream media are refusing to acknowledge the material fact that there are rampant voting problems in our state.

What is more troubling is that the United States is in a habit of spending millions of dollars, and putting lives of our soldiers at risk, to ensure safe and secure elections in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kosovo and Bosnia. But we are unable to conduct free and fair elections in our Commonwealth.

Something is seriously wrong when a ruling class, enabled by a complicit media, refuse to take any concerted effort to safeguard our own elections. Every legal vote must count and any who cheat in an election must be held accountable. Our Republic cannot long endure without free and fair elections where each person has one legal vote.

 

[Tampa_Bay]

Technically, the law was changed by the governor, with support of the courts. That is unconstitutional. Period.

Thank you, thank you, thank you. Someone finally GETS IT.

Technically, the law was changed by the governor, with support of the courts. That is unconstitutional. Period.

Article 2, section 1, clause 2 states only the legislature can make and our change election laws.

Separation of powers us what that is called.

The courts (jucicial) can't make or change law.
The governor (executive) can't make or change law

The legislative branch does.
212
article 2, section 1, clause 2
212

That is my whole point.

 

[Tampa_Bay]

Crybaby Loser

The forum retard is here. Time to take a break

 

[rightwinger]

The forum retard is here. Time to take a break

Biden 306
Trump 232

Beat that!

 

[Tampa_Bay]

 

[playtime]

unfuckingbelievable - that - after all this time - i'm still having to post -

^^^ THAT ^^^

 

[Lesh]

Technically, the law was changed by the governor, with support of the courts. That is unconstitutional. Period.

Article 2, section 1, clause 2 states only the legislature can make and our change election laws.

Separation of powers is what that is called.

The courts (jucicial) can't make or change law.
The governor (executive) can't make or change law

The legislative branch does.
212
article 2, section 1, clause 2
212

Courts ruled that your interpretation is incorrect.

And NEW change in a ruling like that can ONLY be proactive. Previous ballots cast under the old ruling must be accepted.