Privileged Victims of the Revolution

[martybegan]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.

6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.

still a hack.

Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.

Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.

It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.

No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?

I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.

No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"

I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.

you act like he's the first president to lie.

You mistake bravado and bragging with lying for about 90% of the things you call "lying"

 

[joaquinmiller]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

That's what it always comes to with you clowns - you claim you're better people, in one way or another. It's not so, and it's a shame you don't know that.

 

[HappyJoy]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

Obama was a better president, how many indicted? None?

Of course you'll probably whine about conspiracies having to do with a deep state or whatever your personal perversion is. We didn't attack the capital because we didn't' get our way. You're using name calling as an excuse. And you support the biggest cry baby who is infamous for insulting almost anyone who disagrees with him. That's rich.

 

[marvin martian]

There is no excuse for what those Domestic terrorists did to the Capitol

Interesting that you have such hatred towards these rioters who attacked your white elite leaders, but you fully supported the BLM/Antifa rioters who trashed minority neighborhoods and killed mostly black people all year long across the country. Not a good look for you...

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

That's what it always comes to with you clowns - you claim you're better people, in one way or another. It's not so, and it's a shame you don't know that.

No, I am a better person because I support the ability of idiots like you to spew your moronic blather for all to see, I don't try to silence the opposition.

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

Obama was a better president, how many indicted? None?

Of course you'll probably whine about conspiracies having to do with a deep state or whatever your personal perversion is. We didn't attack the capital because we didn't' get our way. You're using name calling as an excuse. And you support the biggest cry baby who is infamous for insulting almost anyone who disagrees with him. That's rich.

Obama was a cuck. His policies were SJW blather, and he's held up in esteem by you because you are morons.

He was enabled by a press that loved him, and a government apparatus that agreed with him.

 

[joaquinmiller]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.

6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.

still a hack.

Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.

Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.

It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.

No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?

I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.

No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"

I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.

you act like he's the first president to lie.

You mistake bravado and bragging with lying for about 90% of the things you call "lying"

You suck at telling me how I act, think or feel.

I posted a Trump tweet, where he claimed "my investigators" found fraud. How would you characterize that tweet?

 

[HappyJoy]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

Obama was a better president, how many indicted? None?

Of course you'll probably whine about conspiracies having to do with a deep state or whatever your personal perversion is. We didn't attack the capital because we didn't' get our way. You're using name calling as an excuse. And you support the biggest cry baby who is infamous for insulting almost anyone who disagrees with him. That's rich.

Obama was a cuck. His policies were SJW blather, and he's held up in esteem by you because you are morons.

He was enabled by a press that loved him, and a government apparatus that agreed with him.

Oh, my name calling? You're also changing the subject.

You're using name calling as some sort of excuse to invade the capital and for Trump's behavior in general it appears yet here you are name calling. Not that I care if you do or not it just makes your argument less valid.

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.

6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.

still a hack.

Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.

Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.

It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.

No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?

I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.

No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"

I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.

you act like he's the first president to lie.

You mistake bravado and bragging with lying for about 90% of the things you call "lying"

You suck at telling me how I act, think or feel.

I posted a Trump tweet, where he claimed "my investigators" found fraud. How would you characterize that tweet?

I excel at calling out lefty bullshitters like you, who can't even admit to their beliefs because it goes against the narrative in their own addled heads.

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

Obama was a better president, how many indicted? None?

Of course you'll probably whine about conspiracies having to do with a deep state or whatever your personal perversion is. We didn't attack the capital because we didn't' get our way. You're using name calling as an excuse. And you support the biggest cry baby who is infamous for insulting almost anyone who disagrees with him. That's rich.

Obama was a cuck. His policies were SJW blather, and he's held up in esteem by you because you are morons.

He was enabled by a press that loved him, and a government apparatus that agreed with him.

Oh, my name calling? You're also changing the subject.

You're using name calling as some sort of excuse to invade the capital and for Trump's behavior in general it appears yet here you are name calling. Not that I care if you do or not it just makes your argument less valid.

Boo fucking hoo, grow a spine you pansy.

 

[HappyJoy]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.

6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.

still a hack.

Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.

Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.

It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.

No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?

I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.

No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"

I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.

you act like he's the first president to lie.

You mistake bravado and bragging with lying for about 90% of the things you call "lying"

You suck at telling me how I act, think or feel.

I posted a Trump tweet, where he claimed "my investigators" found fraud. How would you characterize that tweet?

I excel at calling out lefty bullshitters like you, who can't even admit to their beliefs because it goes against the narrative in their own addled heads.

Actually you're bad at it.

 

[joaquinmiller]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

That's what it always comes to with you clowns - you claim you're better people, in one way or another. It's not so, and it's a shame you don't know that.

No, I am a better person because I support the ability of idiots like you to spew your moronic blather for all to see, I don't try to silence the opposition.

I haven't tried to silence you. Where did that come from?

I've been called an idiot countless times in cyberspace, but never by a smart person.

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.

6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.

still a hack.

Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.

Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.

It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.

No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?

I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.

No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"

I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.

you act like he's the first president to lie.

You mistake bravado and bragging with lying for about 90% of the things you call "lying"

You suck at telling me how I act, think or feel.

I posted a Trump tweet, where he claimed "my investigators" found fraud. How would you characterize that tweet?

I excel at calling out lefty bullshitters like you, who can't even admit to their beliefs because it goes against the narrative in their own addled heads.

Actually you're bad at it.

I got both you morons roped in for several pages.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I've never seen a more pathetic bunch of 'revolutionaries' in my life.

There you have it folks...more LefTard Logic.

"These are legit REVELUTIONAIRIES!"

"These are a pathetic bunch of REVELUTIONAIRIES."

I don't approve of either however one group brought guns, bombs, handcuffs, nooses, confederate flags into the capital hunting for humans so they could obstruct the peaceful transfer of power that helps us to remain a free country.

The other a cop car.

Which group murdered David Dorn and many others, which robbed, looted and burnt down minority shitholes?
So we know you're credible, link us to your posts denouncing the "other group" would you please?
Thanks in advance.

 

[HappyJoy]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.

6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.

still a hack.

Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.

Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.

It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.

No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?

I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.

No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"

I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.

you act like he's the first president to lie.

You mistake bravado and bragging with lying for about 90% of the things you call "lying"

You suck at telling me how I act, think or feel.

I posted a Trump tweet, where he claimed "my investigators" found fraud. How would you characterize that tweet?

I excel at calling out lefty bullshitters like you, who can't even admit to their beliefs because it goes against the narrative in their own addled heads.

Actually you're bad at it.

I got both you morons roped in for several pages.

Don't see it that way. You're excusing a violent insurrection over name calling as you name call.

 

[22lcidw]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

Obama was a better president, how many indicted? None?

Of course you'll probably whine about conspiracies having to do with a deep state or whatever your personal perversion is. We didn't attack the capital because we didn't' get our way. You're using name calling as an excuse. And you support the biggest cry baby who is infamous for insulting almost anyone who disagrees with him. That's rich.

Obama was a corrupted man who won by his skin color. He was overmatched from the beginning and nearly destroyed the middle east. The same Euro elites who laughed at Trump would consider Obama a butler in their world. Trump was not elected to keep the status quo. And there were few around him to fight for what we all said we wanted over the years.

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.

He condemned the violence. explicitly.

Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.

After the fact to serve his own purpose.

Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)

Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.

He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.

Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.

It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.

They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.

your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.

Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.

It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.

Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.

Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.

That's what it always comes to with you clowns - you claim you're better people, in one way or another. It's not so, and it's a shame you don't know that.

No, I am a better person because I support the ability of idiots like you to spew your moronic blather for all to see, I don't try to silence the opposition.

I haven't tried to silence you. Where did that come from?

I've been called an idiot countless times in cyberspace, but never by a smart person.

here is you gloating over someone else getting silenced:

Video: Ingraham returns slams the chilling effect of free speech

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.

6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.

still a hack.

Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.

Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.

It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.

No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?

I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.

No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"

I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.

you act like he's the first president to lie.

You mistake bravado and bragging with lying for about 90% of the things you call "lying"

You suck at telling me how I act, think or feel.

I posted a Trump tweet, where he claimed "my investigators" found fraud. How would you characterize that tweet?

I excel at calling out lefty bullshitters like you, who can't even admit to their beliefs because it goes against the narrative in their own addled heads.

Actually you're bad at it.

I got both you morons roped in for several pages.

Don't see it that way. You're excusing a violent insurrection over name calling as you name call.

No you are trying to make out trespassing assault and maybe a homicide as a coup.

Oh and a vote got delayed a few hours.

 

[HappyJoy]

I've never seen a more pathetic bunch of 'revolutionaries' in my life.

There you have it folks...more LefTard Logic.

"These are legit REVELUTIONAIRIES!"

"These are a pathetic bunch of REVELUTIONAIRIES."

I don't approve of either however one group brought guns, bombs, handcuffs, nooses, confederate flags into the capital hunting for humans so they could obstruct the peaceful transfer of power that helps us to remain a free country.

The other a cop car.

Which group murdered David Dorn and many others, which robbed, looted and burnt down minority shitholes?
So we know you're credible, link us to your posts denouncing the "other group" would you please?
Thanks in advance.

It wasn't a group in a political sense it was armed robbers who didn't murder him for political reasons that we know of anyway. Sad affair. If you mean "group" as in black people are you saying David Dorn is responsible for his own death?

This thread is about people committing sedition on the capital and then complaining about being maced or harmed in anyway as though they wouldn't expect that as a possibility. I suggest if you want to start a racist thread about blacks then do that somewhere else.

 

[HappyJoy]

View attachment 439342


View attachment 439343

What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.

We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.

Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.

"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.

Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.

He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.

Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.

Are you tired of being a hack yet?

Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.

6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.

still a hack.

Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.

Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.

It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.

No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?

I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.

No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"

I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.

you act like he's the first president to lie.

You mistake bravado and bragging with lying for about 90% of the things you call "lying"

You suck at telling me how I act, think or feel.

I posted a Trump tweet, where he claimed "my investigators" found fraud. How would you characterize that tweet?

I excel at calling out lefty bullshitters like you, who can't even admit to their beliefs because it goes against the narrative in their own addled heads.

Actually you're bad at it.

I got both you morons roped in for several pages.

Don't see it that way. You're excusing a violent insurrection over name calling as you name call.

No you are trying to make out trespassing assault and maybe a homicide as a coup.

Oh and a vote got delayed a few hours.

Did I call it a coup? I called it insurrection and sedition. The attempted coup was lying about voter fraud in public and then denying it in the courts. You seem to have a history of lying about what I say.