Predictions

[skookerasbil]

 

[percysunshine]

Shouldn't the 'Right' be on the right, and the 'Left' be on the left?

.

 

[skookerasbil]

Shouldn't the 'Right' be on the right, and the 'Left' be on the left?

.

yeah...........you're probably right. I think it pretty much gets the point across though..........

 

[RollingThunder]

Shouldn't the 'Right' be on the right, and the 'Left' be on the left?

.

yeah...........you're probably right. I think it pretty much gets the point across though..........

Yeah, it does get the point across that you're a flaming moron with a cartoon mentality.

 

[westwall]

Shouldn't the 'Right' be on the right, and the 'Left' be on the left?

.

yeah...........you're probably right. I think it pretty much gets the point across though..........

Yeah, it does get the point across that you're a flaming moron with a cartoon mentality.

At least he's creative enough to make them. All you do is cut and paste BS. Point goes to Skookerasbill, trolling blunder is in the penalty box for being inane.

 

[RollingThunder]

yeah...........you're probably right. I think it pretty much gets the point across though..........

Yeah, it does get the point across that you're a flaming moron with a cartoon mentality.

At least he's creative enough to make them. All you do is cut and paste BS. Point goes to Skookerasbill, trolling blunder is in the penalty box for being inane.

LOLOLOLOLOL. I don't know what is funnier...the fact that you moronically anti-science denier cultists think that scientific evidence and testimony is all "BS" if it is copied verbatim for accuracy or the fact that you, walleyed, are stupid enough to imagine that the kookster actually created any of his cartoons instead of just "cut and paste"ing stuff together or the fact that you're retarded enough to think that kooker's cartoons add anything meaningful to the debate. And talk about 'inane'...dude, you are the king of it. LOLOLOLOL

 

[percysunshine]

Yeah, it does get the point across that you're a flaming moron with a cartoon mentality.

A cartoon mentality is better than no mentality at all.

 

[RollingThunder]

Yeah, it does get the point across that you're a flaming moron with a cartoon mentality.

A cartoon mentality is better than no mentality at all.

LOL....and you're obviously speaking from personal experience.. It must suck to be as braindead as you've shown yourself to be, percy.

 

[skookerasbil]

Yeah, it does get the point across that you're a flaming moron with a cartoon mentality.

A cartoon mentality is better than no mentality at all.

LOL....and you're obviously speaking from personal experience.. It must suck to be as braindead as you've shown yourself to be, percy.

meh............

I love being the most hated, personally attacked member on this forum. Of course, the reason is clear. Lets face it..........you have three types of people come into this forum. 1)The Environmental, anti-capitalist, radical alarmists...........2) Conservatives, interested in pointing out the fabrications in the data related to the "consensus"..........and..........3)Curious newcomers wandering in looking for some direction with this stuff.

And what do the newcomers see?

They see a perpetual pattern. A pattern of pronounced anger and angst in the posts by the Environmental, anti-capitalist, radical alarmists, going mental when their point of view is challenged.

The newcomers see the volumes of information posted up by the likes of Ian, Westwall, Polar Bear, Matthew et. al................posted up, by the way, in such a manner that makes the environmentalist positions look absurd. Stuff they've never heard about before.Then SKOOKS rolls in and highlights the absurdity with genuine gay MSPAINT Photobucket classics.

The newcomer leaves the forum thinking, "Shit........'the consensus' is total Bullshit afterall!!", thus, they are no longer enamoured with the prospect of being part of the herd of sheep. In fact........they leave wanting to be a million miles away from being labeled as an OCD mindless follower of phoney!!!


It is THAT that causes the public displays of pronounced angry rants by the environmental radicals. Indeed...........when your position is challenged and the consistent responses are angry personal attacks, it looks like you're hiding something and simply representing a hyper-partisan "cause". In other words..............the position looks WEAK!!!



And thats also why the political dynamic has so abruptly changed in this country since 2008. Nobody likes to be viewed as a mindless zombie embracing hysterical stuff all the time. Its just the way it is...........

 

[westwall]

Yeah, it does get the point across that you're a flaming moron with a cartoon mentality.

At least he's creative enough to make them. All you do is cut and paste BS. Point goes to Skookerasbill, trolling blunder is in the penalty box for being inane.

LOLOLOLOLOL. I don't know what is funnier...the fact that you moronically anti-science denier cultists think that scientific evidence and testimony is all "BS" if it is copied verbatim for accuracy or the fact that you, walleyed, are stupid enough to imagine that the kookster actually created any of his cartoons instead of just "cut and paste"ing stuff together or the fact that you're retarded enough to think that kooker's cartoons add anything meaningful to the debate. And talk about 'inane'...dude, you are the king of it. LOLOLOLOL

Alarmism is anti science buckwheat. Alarmisim pre supposes a cause and ignores any other possible source for observed phenomena. AGW alarmism is the POSTER CHILD for anti scientific thought. It is pseudo science on a grand scale.

 

[RollingThunder]

At least he's creative enough to make them. All you do is cut and paste BS. Point goes to Skookerasbill, trolling blunder is in the penalty box for being inane.

LOLOLOLOLOL. I don't know what is funnier...the fact that you moronically anti-science denier cultists think that scientific evidence and testimony is all "BS" if it is copied verbatim for accuracy or the fact that you, walleyed, are stupid enough to imagine that the kookster actually created any of his cartoons instead of just "cut and paste"ing stuff together or the fact that you're retarded enough to think that kooker's cartoons add anything meaningful to the debate. And talk about 'inane'...dude, you are the king of it. LOLOLOLOL

Alarmism is anti science buckwheat. Alarmisim pre supposes a cause and ignores any other possible source for observed phenomena. AGW alarmism is the POSTER CHILD for anti scientific thought. It is pseudo science on a grand scale.

LOLOLOLOL.....and another moronically wrong, bizarro-world pronouncement by the walleyedretard. "Alarmism" is another of the propaganda memes the fossil fuel industry is using to bamboozle you but it is otherwise quite meaningless. Scientists are quite properly doing their job and warning the world about a very real danger that you are unfortunately far too brainwashed and ignorant to accept. You just highlight your own insanity, ignorance and stupidity when you try to claim that modern climate science and the conclusions the scientists have reached regarding mankind's role in the current abrupt global warming are all "pseudo science on a grand scale" when virtually all of the world's climate scientists agree with AGW and almost every scientific society, institute or organization in the world also supports those conclusions, minus a very few who remain neutral because climate science isn't their area of expertise. Meanwhile the actual climate scientists are pointing out that the idiotic nonsense that you denier cultists have been fooled into believing refutes the scientific evidence, is actually very much pseudo-science and bs. So it comes down to a pretty obvious choice. Either almost all of the scientists in the world are secretly "anti-science", as you and the other denier cultists like to claim, or it is you nutjob denier cultists who are the anti-science idiots who reject the evidence and testimony of the world science community.

Scientific opinion on climate change

The Consensus on Global Warming: From Science to Industry & Religion

Global Warming: Man or Myth? - The Scientific Consensus

 

[skookerasbil]

LOLOLOLOLOL. I don't know what is funnier...the fact that you moronically anti-science denier cultists think that scientific evidence and testimony is all "BS" if it is copied verbatim for accuracy or the fact that you, walleyed, are stupid enough to imagine that the kookster actually created any of his cartoons instead of just "cut and paste"ing stuff together or the fact that you're retarded enough to think that kooker's cartoons add anything meaningful to the debate. And talk about 'inane'...dude, you are the king of it. LOLOLOLOL

Alarmism is anti science buckwheat. Alarmisim pre supposes a cause and ignores any other possible source for observed phenomena. AGW alarmism is the POSTER CHILD for anti scientific thought. It is pseudo science on a grand scale.

LOLOLOLOL.....and another moronically wrong, bizarro-world pronouncement by the walleyedretard. "Alarmism" is another of the propaganda memes the fossil fuel industry is using to bamboozle you but it is otherwise quite meaningless. Scientists are quite properly doing their job and warning the world about a very real danger that you are unfortunately far too brainwashed and ignorant to accept. You just highlight your own insanity, ignorance and stupidity when you try to claim that modern climate science and the conclusions the scientists have reached regarding mankind's role in the current abrupt global warming are all "pseudo science on a grand scale" when virtually all of the world's climate scientists agree with AGW and almost every scientific society, institute or organization in the world also supports those conclusions, minus a very few who remain neutral because climate science isn't their area of expertise. Meanwhile the actual climate scientists are pointing out that the idiotic nonsense that you denier cultists have been fooled into believing refutes the scientific evidence, is actually very much pseudo-science and bs. So it comes down to a pretty obvious choice. Either almost all of the scientists in the world are secretly "anti-science", as you and the other denier cultists like to claim, or it is you nutjob denier cultists who are the anti-science idiots who reject the evidence and testimony of the world science community.

Scientific opinion on climate change

The Consensus on Global Warming: From Science to Industry & Religion

Global Warming: Man or Myth? - The Scientific Consensus

NOBODY

CARES

BECAUSE

IT

DOESNT

MATTER

s0n

scam fAiL

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[skookerasbil]

HEY WEST.........DID YOU HEAR???

 

[westwall]

LOLOLOLOLOL. I don't know what is funnier...the fact that you moronically anti-science denier cultists think that scientific evidence and testimony is all "BS" if it is copied verbatim for accuracy or the fact that you, walleyed, are stupid enough to imagine that the kookster actually created any of his cartoons instead of just "cut and paste"ing stuff together or the fact that you're retarded enough to think that kooker's cartoons add anything meaningful to the debate. And talk about 'inane'...dude, you are the king of it. LOLOLOLOL

Alarmism is anti science buckwheat. Alarmisim pre supposes a cause and ignores any other possible source for observed phenomena. AGW alarmism is the POSTER CHILD for anti scientific thought. It is pseudo science on a grand scale.

LOLOLOLOL.....and another moronically wrong, bizarro-world pronouncement by the walleyedretard. "Alarmism" is another of the propaganda memes the fossil fuel industry is using to bamboozle you but it is otherwise quite meaningless. Scientists are quite properly doing their job and warning the world about a very real danger that you are unfortunately far too brainwashed and ignorant to accept. You just highlight your own insanity, ignorance and stupidity when you try to claim that modern climate science and the conclusions the scientists have reached regarding mankind's role in the current abrupt global warming are all "pseudo science on a grand scale" when virtually all of the world's climate scientists agree with AGW and almost every scientific society, institute or organization in the world also supports those conclusions, minus a very few who remain neutral because climate science isn't their area of expertise. Meanwhile the actual climate scientists are pointing out that the idiotic nonsense that you denier cultists have been fooled into believing refutes the scientific evidence, is actually very much pseudo-science and bs. So it comes down to a pretty obvious choice. Either almost all of the scientists in the world are secretly "anti-science", as you and the other denier cultists like to claim, or it is you nutjob denier cultists who are the anti-science idiots who reject the evidence and testimony of the world science community.

Scientific opinion on climate change

The Consensus on Global Warming: From Science to Industry & Religion

Global Warming: Man or Myth? - The Scientific Consensus

An appeal to authority again? That's the best you've got? Here's a hint ol trolling blunder fraud, science is not about polling results. A self choosing poll amongst climate scientists doesn't proove anything except that they have nothing. All the climatologists have a poor models that can't recreate the weather from a week ago. they do not correlate with empirical evidence. They do not correlate with the historical record. They are pseudo science on a grand scale otherwise they could come up with something other than a pathetic appeal to authority.

 

[Old Rocks]

Here we go. Poor ol' Walleyes, claiming to be a scientist, then dissing scientists and science every chance he gets. Just another troll doing the Napoleon thing on a message board.

 

[RollingThunder]

Alarmism is anti science buckwheat. Alarmisim pre supposes a cause and ignores any other possible source for observed phenomena. AGW alarmism is the POSTER CHILD for anti scientific thought. It is pseudo science on a grand scale.

LOLOLOLOL.....and another moronically wrong, bizarro-world pronouncement by the walleyedretard. "Alarmism" is another of the propaganda memes the fossil fuel industry is using to bamboozle you but it is otherwise quite meaningless. Scientists are quite properly doing their job and warning the world about a very real danger that you are unfortunately far too brainwashed and ignorant to accept. You just highlight your own insanity, ignorance and stupidity when you try to claim that modern climate science and the conclusions the scientists have reached regarding mankind's role in the current abrupt global warming are all "pseudo science on a grand scale" when virtually all of the world's climate scientists agree with AGW and almost every scientific society, institute or organization in the world also supports those conclusions, minus a very few who remain neutral because climate science isn't their area of expertise. Meanwhile the actual climate scientists are pointing out that the idiotic nonsense that you denier cultists have been fooled into believing refutes the scientific evidence, is actually very much pseudo-science and bs. So it comes down to a pretty obvious choice. Either almost all of the scientists in the world are secretly "anti-science", as you and the other denier cultists like to claim, or it is you nutjob denier cultists who are the anti-science idiots who reject the evidence and testimony of the world science community.

Scientific opinion on climate change

The Consensus on Global Warming: From Science to Industry & Religion

Global Warming: Man or Myth? - The Scientific Consensus

An appeal to authority again? That's the best you've got? Here's a hint ol trolling blunder fraud, science is not about polling results. A self choosing poll amongst climate scientists doesn't proove anything except that they have nothing. All the climatologists have a poor models that can't recreate the weather from a week ago. they do not correlate with empirical evidence. They do not correlate with the historical record. They are pseudo science on a grand scale otherwise they could come up with something other than a pathetic appeal to authority.

Changing the subject again, moron? As you usually do when you have no real response to the thorough debunking of some idiotic thing you just said. We were talking about your amazingly retarded claim that the scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming/climate change is "anti scientific thought" and "pseudo science on a grand scale" - which I debunked by pointing out that there is an easily verified worldwide scientific consensus supporting AGW. You can't dispute that so you're trying to pretend that the issue is whether citing the scientific consensus violates a rule of formal debate, which is an irrelevant non-issue to begin with. You just demonstrate the absurdity of your position when you try to pretend that the world scientific community is "anti-science" while apparently imagining that it is you poor, ignorant, deluded stooges for the fossil fuel industry who are really the ones doing the actual science (in your mother's basement, I guess) and proving it to the world by posting your 'scathing critiques' of the world's actual working climate scientists and their research, on random internet political forums rather than publishing your work in Nature or Science or the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology or the Journal of Climate, to name a few out of the many in the climate science fields. LOLOLOLOL....your delusions just get funnier and funnier, walleyed.

And once again, you poor deluded fool, the 'scientific consensus' reflects the reality of the results of decades of concentrated research that has been done by tens of thousands of scientists from dozens of countries all around the world. The consensus is not in itself an argument that is used in scientifically demonstrating the validity of the conclusions of the climate scientists. That is done with the mountains of actual evidence in many areas of study. The consensus reflects the fact that scientific papers about the research done on the evidence overwhelmingly support AGW and no one has been able to find any natural mechanisms that could explain the evidence if you leave off CO2 forcing. As I pointed out above, the scientific consensus (on any topic), even when it reflects a much lower level of unanimity than is the case with AGW, is a useful tool in making public policy and is regarded as such by intelligent people generally including most world leaders in government and business.

As far as your delusions about climate models....

YouTube - This Year's Model


***

 

[westwall]

Here we go. Poor ol' Walleyes, claiming to be a scientist, then dissing scientists and science every chance he gets. Just another troll doing the Napoleon thing on a message board.

Wrong again bozo. I never dis good scientists. I only dis scientists who fail to follow the scientific method.

 

[westwall]

LOLOLOLOL.....and another moronically wrong, bizarro-world pronouncement by the walleyedretard. "Alarmism" is another of the propaganda memes the fossil fuel industry is using to bamboozle you but it is otherwise quite meaningless. Scientists are quite properly doing their job and warning the world about a very real danger that you are unfortunately far too brainwashed and ignorant to accept. You just highlight your own insanity, ignorance and stupidity when you try to claim that modern climate science and the conclusions the scientists have reached regarding mankind's role in the current abrupt global warming are all "pseudo science on a grand scale" when virtually all of the world's climate scientists agree with AGW and almost every scientific society, institute or organization in the world also supports those conclusions, minus a very few who remain neutral because climate science isn't their area of expertise. Meanwhile the actual climate scientists are pointing out that the idiotic nonsense that you denier cultists have been fooled into believing refutes the scientific evidence, is actually very much pseudo-science and bs. So it comes down to a pretty obvious choice. Either almost all of the scientists in the world are secretly "anti-science", as you and the other denier cultists like to claim, or it is you nutjob denier cultists who are the anti-science idiots who reject the evidence and testimony of the world science community.

Scientific opinion on climate change

The Consensus on Global Warming: From Science to Industry & Religion

Global Warming: Man or Myth? - The Scientific Consensus

An appeal to authority again? That's the best you've got? Here's a hint ol trolling blunder fraud, science is not about polling results. A self choosing poll amongst climate scientists doesn't proove anything except that they have nothing. All the climatologists have a poor models that can't recreate the weather from a week ago. they do not correlate with empirical evidence. They do not correlate with the historical record. They are pseudo science on a grand scale otherwise they could come up with something other than a pathetic appeal to authority.

Changing the subject again, moron? As you usually do when you have no real response to the thorough debunking of some idiotic thing you just said. We were talking about your amazingly retarded claim that the scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming/climate change is "anti scientific thought" and "pseudo science on a grand scale" - which I debunked by pointing out that there is an easily verified worldwide scientific consensus supporting AGW. You can't dispute that so you're trying to pretend that the issue is whether citing the scientific consensus violates a rule of formal debate, which is an irrelevant non-issue to begin with. You just demonstrate the absurdity of your position when you try to pretend that the world scientific community is "anti-science" while apparently imagining that it is you poor, ignorant, deluded stooges for the fossil fuel industry who are really the ones doing the actual science (in your mother's basement, I guess) and proving it to the world by posting your 'scathing critiques' of the world's actual working climate scientists and their research, on random internet political forums rather than publishing your work in Nature or Science or the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology or the Journal of Climate, to name a few out of the many in the climate science fields. LOLOLOLOL....your delusions just get funnier and funnier, walleyed.

And once again, you poor deluded fool, the 'scientific consensus' reflects the reality of the results of decades of concentrated research that has been done by tens of thousands of scientists from dozens of countries all around the world. The consensus is not in itself an argument that is used in scientifically demonstrating the validity of the conclusions of the climate scientists. That is done with the mountains of actual evidence in many areas of study. The consensus reflects the fact that scientific papers about the research done on the evidence overwhelmingly support AGW and no one has been able to find any natural mechanisms that could explain the evidence if you leave off CO2 forcing. As I pointed out above, the scientific consensus (on any topic), even when it reflects a much lower level of unanimity than is the case with AGW, is a useful tool in making public policy and is regarded as such by intelligent people generally including most world leaders in government and business.

As far as your delusions about climate models....

YouTube - This Year's Model


***

Yeah? So? Until they deal with the temperature manipulation issues (remember NIWA in New Zealand? Your alarmists got caught falsifying the temp record there and got slammed for it) and the complete corruption of the peer review process in the field of climatology their opinions mean nothing to legitimate scientists. Five years from now you will see the complete collapse of this horse manure and I will be laughing at you.

They are allready on the way down, they are treading water as it is.

 

[RollingThunder]

An appeal to authority again? That's the best you've got? Here's a hint ol trolling blunder fraud, science is not about polling results. A self choosing poll amongst climate scientists doesn't proove anything except that they have nothing. All the climatologists have a poor models that can't recreate the weather from a week ago. they do not correlate with empirical evidence. They do not correlate with the historical record. They are pseudo science on a grand scale otherwise they could come up with something other than a pathetic appeal to authority.

Changing the subject again, moron? As you usually do when you have no real response to the thorough debunking of some idiotic thing you just said. We were talking about your amazingly retarded claim that the scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming/climate change is "anti scientific thought" and "pseudo science on a grand scale" - which I debunked by pointing out that there is an easily verified worldwide scientific consensus supporting AGW. You can't dispute that so you're trying to pretend that the issue is whether citing the scientific consensus violates a rule of formal debate, which is an irrelevant non-issue to begin with. You just demonstrate the absurdity of your position when you try to pretend that the world scientific community is "anti-science" while apparently imagining that it is you poor, ignorant, deluded stooges for the fossil fuel industry who are really the ones doing the actual science (in your mother's basement, I guess) and proving it to the world by posting your 'scathing critiques' of the world's actual working climate scientists and their research, on random internet political forums rather than publishing your work in Nature or Science or the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology or the Journal of Climate, to name a few out of the many in the climate science fields. LOLOLOLOL....your delusions just get funnier and funnier, walleyed.

And once again, you poor deluded fool, the 'scientific consensus' reflects the reality of the results of decades of concentrated research that has been done by tens of thousands of scientists from dozens of countries all around the world. The consensus is not in itself an argument that is used in scientifically demonstrating the validity of the conclusions of the climate scientists. That is done with the mountains of actual evidence in many areas of study. The consensus reflects the fact that scientific papers about the research done on the evidence overwhelmingly support AGW and no one has been able to find any natural mechanisms that could explain the evidence if you leave off CO2 forcing. As I pointed out above, the scientific consensus (on any topic), even when it reflects a much lower level of unanimity than is the case with AGW, is a useful tool in making public policy and is regarded as such by intelligent people generally including most world leaders in government and business.

As far as your delusions about climate models....

YouTube - This Year's Model


***

Yeah? So? Until they deal with the temperature manipulation issues (remember NIWA in New Zealand? Your alarmists got caught falsifying the temp record there and got slammed for it) and the complete corruption of the peer review process in the field of climatology their opinions mean nothing to legitimate scientists. Five years from now you will see the complete collapse of this horse manure and I will be laughing at you.

They are allready on the way down, they are treading water as it is.

You are soooo delusional, walleyed. The only "issues" are phantom artifacts of the fossil fuel industry propaganda campaign and exist only in the heads of denier cult freaks like you. In the real world, there is no serious scientific challenge to AGW and all of the indicators (like rising temperatures, melting glaciers and icecaps, changing seasonal timing, etc. etc.) and other evidence (like paleoclimate data and studies) continue to point to abrupt global warming beyond the range of natural variability that is being induced by human carbon emissions and deforestation practices.

Five years from now, new world temperature records will have been set, climate pattern disruptions and wacky extreme weather events will have increased and the intelligent people of the world will be doing what they're doing even now and laughing at you anti-science, warmed-over 'flat-earthers' for your near-psychotic denial of reality.

Wrong again bozo. I never dis good scientists. I only dis scientists who fail to follow the scientific method.

LOLOLOLOLOLOL.....very funny coming from someone like you, walleyedretard, who wouldn't know the 'scientific method' if it bit you.