Powerful video on the history of Abortion.

If you want to reduce abortions, start promoting sex education in high schools, contraceptives provide through health insurance, pre-natal care and delivery with no co-pays, paid maternity leave and subsidized day care.

Women have abortions because they cannot afford to have babies. If you really want to reduce abortions, make it easier and cheaper for women to have the baby.
 
If you want to reduce abortions, start promoting sex education in high schools, contraceptives provide through health insurance, pre-natal care and delivery with no co-pays, paid maternity leave and subsidized day care.

Women have abortions because they cannot afford to have babies. If you really want to reduce abortions, make it easier and cheaper for women to have the baby.

How about parents actually parent?
 
If you want to reduce abortions, start promoting sex education in high schools, contraceptives provide through health insurance, pre-natal care and delivery with no co-pays, paid maternity leave and subsidized day care.

Women have abortions because they cannot afford to have babies. If you really want to reduce abortions, make it easier and cheaper for women to have the baby.

How about parents actually parent?

And how are you going to enforce that.

The problem with this film is that it works on the premise that there were no abortions before 1973.

Reality. By 1973, women were already getting abortions in doctor's offices because the doctors themselves were ignoring the law and no one was enforcing it. SCOTUS just legalized reality.

Hells bells, Romania tried to ban abortion and failed miserably. And that was a communist dictatorship with a secret police force.
 
If you want to reduce abortions, start promoting sex education in high schools, contraceptives provide through health insurance, pre-natal care and delivery with no co-pays, paid maternity leave and subsidized day care.

Women have abortions because they cannot afford to have babies. If you really want to reduce abortions, make it easier and cheaper for women to have the baby.

How about parents actually parent?

How about looking at realistic ways of reducing the need for abortions instead of the personal responsibility mantras of the right wing because those aren't working.

To this liberal, aborting a child you cannot afford to carry to term or to raise IS taking personal responsibility. More than 70% of women say that financial considerations are the primary reason for getting an abortion.

Countries with free birth control, mandatory sex education in high school, universal health care and mandated maternity leave all have lower rates of abortion than the US.

If you're really serious about reducing abortions, you'd be advocating for these things too.
 
To this liberal, aborting a child you cannot afford to carry to term or to raise IS taking personal responsibility. More than 70% of women say that financial considerations are the primary reason for getting an abortion.

Money and convenience over a child,and you think that responsible??!! And You use the correct term,"child"

We have sex ed in schools ,contraception is readily available and cheap,we have maternity leave its is all about personal responsibility,always has been always will be.
 
Why don't conservatives do things to reduce the need for abortion?

Sex education
Open access to contraception
Free prenatal care for expectant mothers
Increased support for single mothers
 
Why don't conservatives do things to reduce the need for abortion?

Sex education
Open access to contraception
Free prenatal care for expectant mothers
Increased support for single mothers

We do, you just chose to ignore those things,it can also be assumed that you also help provide those things??
 
To this liberal, aborting a child you cannot afford to carry to term or to raise IS taking personal responsibility. More than 70% of women say that financial considerations are the primary reason for getting an abortion.

Money and convenience over a child,and you think that responsible??!! And You use the correct term,"child"

We have sex ed in schools ,contraception is readily available and cheap,we have maternity leave its is all about personal responsibility,always has been always will be.

The US does not have mandated maternity leave. Women who get pregnant can be fired.

The majority of women who have abortions already have one or more children. Abortion is the choice they make to care and provide for the children they have.

Right wingers oppose increases in the minimum wage, and other anti-poverty measures. The poor are getting poorer. And abortion is the answer the poor have to deal with unwanted pregnancies.

Calling such abortions a matter of convenience, like these women came to this decision casually, trivializes the issues that working poor women deal with on a day to day basis.

You don't care about these women or their families. You don't care about the babies, once they've been born either. If you did, things like subsidized day care, family leave and minimum wage would matter to you.
 
Why don't conservatives do things to reduce the need for abortion?

Sex education
Open access to contraception
Free prenatal care for expectant mothers
Increased support for single mothers

We do, you just chose to ignore those things,it can also be assumed that you also help provide those things??

No--we have social right wing nut cases right now on this board--that are continually complaining about insurers paying for prescription birth control pills--while at the same time they are adamantly opposed to abortion--sometimes even in the instance of rape or incest.

You can't have your cake and eat it too, but there are several members of this board that believe they can.

There is a television reality show on television right now--can't remember the name--that has actually REDUCED the numbers of single mothers in this country--just by showing them how very difficult it is to raise a child by themselves. It's working. That's education versus some right wing nut case up there banging the drum on family values that they're not listening too. And some on this board would deny these same women access to birth control pills? This is a prescription drug--there is no FREE access to it. And they are the overwhelmingly preferred method of contraception.
 
Last edited:
Guys taking care of a child is really really expensive, like some of the posters here already said alot of the women who get abortions said finances was the big reason behind it.
 
Why don't conservatives do things to reduce the need for abortion?

Sex education
Open access to contraception
Free prenatal care for expectant mothers
Increased support for single mothers

We do, you just chose to ignore those things,it can also be assumed that you also help provide those things??

Glad to hear that....you need to get the word out to the rest of the party

Preventing Pregnancy is GOOD
Taking care of single mothers is GOOD
 
Why don't conservatives do things to reduce the need for abortion?

Sex education
Open access to contraception
Free prenatal care for expectant mothers
Increased support for single mothers

We do, you just chose to ignore those things,it can also be assumed that you also help provide those things??

No--we have social right wing nut cases right now on this board--that are continually complaining about insurers paying for prescription birth control pills--while at the same time they are adamantly opposed to abortion--sometimes even in the instance of rape or incest.

You can't have your cake and eat it too, but there are several members of this board that believe they can.

There is a television reality show on television right now--can't remember the name--that has actually REDUCED the numbers of single mothers in this country--just by showing them how very difficult it is to raise a child by themselves. It's working. That's education versus some right wing nut case up there banging the drum on family values that they're not listening too. And some on this board would deny these same women access to birth control pills? This is a prescription drug--there is no FREE access to it. And they are the overwhelmingly preferred method of contraception.

They also bitch and moan when the woman has the baby and is therefore on welfare. I also find it funny that they rail against the group of people who pretty much would never have an abortion, Homosexuals.
 
here to another 41 years!

Indeed.

Let's see if we can get those numbers up!!

Especially in the poorer red welfare states.

Re-open those clinics, public funding, even mandatory abortions for drug addicts and unfit mothers. (see Citizen Ruth)
 
To this liberal, aborting a child you cannot afford to carry to term or to raise IS taking personal responsibility. More than 70% of women say that financial considerations are the primary reason for getting an abortion.

Money and convenience over a child,and you think that responsible??!! And You use the correct term,"child"

We have sex ed in schools ,contraception is readily available and cheap,we have maternity leave its is all about personal responsibility,always has been always will be.

The US does not have mandated maternity leave. Women who get pregnant can be fired.

The majority of women who have abortions already have one or more children. Abortion is the choice they make to care and provide for the children they have.

Right wingers oppose increases in the minimum wage, and other anti-poverty measures. The poor are getting poorer. And abortion is the answer the poor have to deal with unwanted pregnancies.

Calling such abortions a matter of convenience, like these women came to this decision casually, trivializes the issues that working poor women deal with on a day to day basis.

You don't care about these women or their families. You don't care about the babies, once they've been born either. If you did, things like subsidized day care, family leave and minimum wage would matter to you.

Your the only one that is saying it I don't,not once have I ever posted such bull shit,but then coming from a person that thinks its responsible to kill children over money,what would one expect.

One would think a rational person would care about lives more than bucks and convenience,and that what,it is,you can paint it anyway you want,you are killing a living human being,because you think it would be to expensive to raise.

So a women has a 2 week old child,is fired or laid off or what ever,but looses a job,would it then be rational to kill the child because it would cost to much??!!

That is what you logic says,and it make NO sense.!!
 
here to another 41 years!

Indeed.

Let's see if we can get those numbers up!!

Especially in the poorer red welfare states.

Re-open those clinics, public funding, even mandatory abortions for drug addicts and unfit mothers. (see Citizen Ruth)

I'm sure Adolf Hitler would be proud. He mandated abortions to reduce the population of the "inferior" race.
 

Forum List

Back
Top