- Aug 19, 2008
- 11,101
- 3,920
- 315
Specifically, how does this differ from those who refused to remove Clinton for federal felonies committed while in office because they believed said felonies are not impeachable offenses?No, my argument is that the Senate Republicans will violate their oath of office by not being impartial jurors in Trumps trial.So... what sound argument is there that the Republicans in the Senate will violate their oath by not removing Trump?No. They did not.Did refusal to remove a President for the federal felonies of perjury and obstruction of justice, because neither rise to the level of an impeachable offense, violate the oaths of office of those involved?It's called their 'oath of office'. Look it up yourself.
Since many Republicans voted against removing Clinton, I'll leave it to you to research their reasoning.
If you do not see a major difference between someone lying about a personal sexual affair vs. someone abusing the power of his office for personal political gain, then your too stupid to try reasoning with.