Pornhub blocks Virginia access.

[iamwhatiseem]

In reaction to Virginia requiring porn sites to verify user ages... the world largest porn site decided to simply block the entire state.
It would be awesome if they would just block the entire country, and all the others right along with it.

Pornhub pulls out of Virginia blocking users from accessing website

Virginians are no longer able to access one of the world's most popular websites, as Pornhub announced a ban in response to a new law taking effect.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Blaster]

In reaction to Virginia requiring porn sites to verify user ages... the world largest porn site decided to simply block the entire state.
It would be awesome if they would just block the entire country, and all the others right along with it.

Pornhub pulls out of Virginia blocking users from accessing website

Virginians are no longer able to access one of the world's most popular websites, as Pornhub announced a ban in response to a new law taking effect.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Why would anyone watch porn?

 

[shockedcanadian]

Someone is gong to be voted out of office. There are going to be some angry male (and female) voters!

 

[DudleySmith]

Good. The rest of the states should follow immediately. The deviants and gimps can move to Europe if they have to have porn.

 

[Blaster]

Good. The rest of the states should follow immediately. The deviants and gimps can move to Europe if they have to have porn.

Anyone that needs to view porn is pathetic.

 

[DudleySmith]

Someone is gong to be voted out of office.

Don't know what the ratio of gimps, freaks, and fags is to regular people is in Virginia, but yes, there are probably a lot of urban areas where the pols will cater to the sickos.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Anyone that needs to view porn is pathetic.

Needs to or chooses to? There is a difference.

 

[DudleySmith]

Anyone that needs to view porn is pathetic.

I don't mind a little cheesecake and the like, but what they show now is truly sick shit.

 

[Blaster]

Needs to or chooses to? There is a difference.

Both are pathetic.

 

[Blaster]

I don't mind a little cheesecake and the like, but what they show now is truly sick shit.

Why watch it?

 

[shockedcanadian]

Don't know what the ratio of gimps, freaks, and fags is to regular people is in Virginia, but yes, ther are probably a lot of urban areas where the pols will cater to the sickos.

Porn is for sickos? I am not against the age requirement as you obviously don't want young people watching it. If people have to show.I.D that's a problem though. Even a security threat if foreign agents got their hands on the information. Parents should block sites with their ISP if they don't want young people to access it. Thats the more self determinant approach.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Good. The rest of the states should follow immediately. The deviants and gimps can move to Europe if they have to have porn.

If porn watching is only done by deviants, then 99.98% of all males are deviants.
It is not the "customer" that is the deviant. It is the providers.
Porn in my youth (70s-80s) was extremely tame compared to the sick, demented perverted shit they throw out there now.
I have been saying for years it is inexcusable this industry is largely unregulated.
20 years ago porn should have been required to have a ".prn" suffix (instead of .com) This would make blocking access super easy.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I fully support this becoming nation wide.

 

[Blaster]

I fully support this becoming nation wide.

A total ban on porn?

 

[DudleySmith]

Why watch it?

Because they're brainwashed into believing supporting that sicko shit makes them 'progressive' and libertarian n stuff'. SAme with having to have faggots in literally every TV sitcom now. But they don't dare show what faggots are into in real life; they all pretend they channel Betty White and Donna Reed or somebody. lol

 

[DudleySmith]

If porn watching is only done by deviants, then 99.98% of all males are deviants.

Seems to be getting close to that in younger generations. There some new studies that prove just how bad the effects are on society as whole and the desensitization it creates in impressionable males and their attitudes toward women.

 

[Blaster]

Seems to be getting close to that in younger generations.

I'm proud to say I don't view porn.

 

[DudleySmith]

Porn is for sickos? I am not against the age requirement as you obvioously don't want young people watching it. If people have to show.I.D that's a problem though. Even a security threat if foreign agents got their hands on the information. Parents should block sites with their ISP if they don't want young people to access it. Thats the more self determinant approach.

Ban it all; I don't care about the fake 'problems' it generates for the scum that make and peddle the crap.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

As with most things, experience shows that those that complain the loudest are likely the largest consumers of the product

 

[shockedcanadian]

If porn watching is only done by deviants, then 99.98% of all males are deviants.
It is not the "customer" that is the deviant. It is the providers.
Porn in my youth (70s-80s) was extremely tame compared to the sick, demented perverted shit they throw out there now.
I have been saying for years it is inexcusable this industry is largely unregulated.
20 years ago porn should have been required to have a ".prn" suffix (instead of .com) This would make blocking access super easy.

You will only find sicko stuff if you click on it. You may accidentally get a popup or something but in general if sickos look for sick stuff, they will find it.

Hopefully those tasked with enforcing laws in turn will find them.

I don't know what sick stuff you are referring to but most men just watch to see beautiful women.