Pope Francis' Encyclical On Climate Change Leaked...

wow someone went through a lot of pain to put that together. However, if I may politely tell you that it means zip to my request. So, I'm glad you know how to maneuver through the internet. Good for you. but doesn't answer my post. Oh and btw, I did go to a few of the links and the one I found outstanding was the one to the sea level rise. showing millimeter on the axis to make 3.5 inches look like a mountain. very funny. but not unexpected.
 
GOP Catholics more convinced about climate change than other Republicans

Culling information from six national polls taken over the period from 2012 through 2015, the Yale and George Mason teams looked in particular at Catholic Republicans and how their climate views stood out within their own party.

The result was that even in a party known for its climate change skepticism, this group appeared less skeptical of climate science and more in favor of climate action.

Of non-Catholic Republicans, who will henceforth be referred to in this topic as pagans ( :D ), 42 percent agree global warming is happening.

Of Catholic Republicans, 51 percent agree global warming is happening.


That means nothing.. I, ME, "Denier" that I am - agree "global warming is happening" Has NOTHING TO DO with the hysterical claims that Earth will commit planetcide if a 2degC trigger due to a combo of CO2 and natural causes is met.. Or whether our piddling short 60 year spike means anything in terms of the Climate system and it's plodding changes....

You cannot get to the core AGWarming, Climate Change debate withquestions as simple as that --- UNLESS you are polling for propaganda purposes only.. Just as you would not understand the flaws in that massive "evidence you cite without a moderate investment in studying the debate.

Same for constantly changing "medical science" advice. You need skin in the game..
 
Last edited:
Here, start with the first link in that link I just provided: There is no evidence Yes there is Grist

Then read the data in the links in that link:
answered in the previous post, this is a duplicate.
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
Information Sheet 1
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
Satellite temperature measurements
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
Global Hemispheric and Zonal Temperature Deviations CDIAC - Angell
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
NOAA Paleoclimatology Global Warming - The Data
biglocalpoll.gif


that doesn't appear to be global. hmmm really fail on this one. still no evidence about CO2.
http://nsidc.org/sotc/glacier_balance.html
doesn't answer the request to show what 120 PPM of CO2 does. It is purely measurements. fail.
Sea Ice Decline Intensifies National Snow and Ice Data Center
seaice.anomaly.arctic.png
fail.
CU Sea Level Research Group University of Colorado
graph shows 3.5 inches after converting the millimeters to inches. funny stuff but fail.
NOAA Paleoclimatology Global Warming - The Data
no evidence of CO2 causes temperature changes. everyone and their brother knows CO2 follows temperatures, or do you not agree?
Climate warning as Siberia melts
abstract: "Kirpotin describes an "ecological landslide that is probably irreversible and is undoubtedly connected to climatic warming"."
says nothing about CO2 causing anything. fail.

So conclusion, all links fail as a response to the request I made. I agree they are all links though and they state exactly what the title states. problem.................................it doesn't supply evidence to support any hypothesis.
 
Last edited:
Francis is Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, and he is infallible when he speaks ex cathedra on faith and morals.

Global warming is not a faith issue and it is not a morals issue. It is a politicized and fraudulent attack on the world economy to force a global, socialist solution to a problem that really doesn't exist.

Why would socialists want to attack the world economy?

OK --- How abot Socialism ITSELF is an attack on our economic system?
You understand better now?
 
I am old enough to remember "global cooling", "nuclear winter", and the crisis that the Earth was running out of fossil fuels.

All of these ginned up crises were lies, plain and simple.
 
I also remember all the ginned up panic about Y2K, and that didn't happen either.
 
I am old enough to remember "global cooling", "nuclear winter", and the crisis that the Earth was running out of fossil fuels.

All of these ginned up crises were lies, plain and simple.
lines at the service stations waiting on gas to be delivered. Funny stuff, why Carter lost the election to Reagan. Yep, but to the punks on here that all never happened.
 
It means he understands the scientific method and the rigors of empirical evidence required to support a scientific theory.

Better than Santorum.
The fact that he signed on to global warming indicates the exact opposite. No one with a knowledge of the scientific method believes in global warming.
Here's another article you will neither read nor understand that lays out the case.
Aliens Cause Global Warming A Lecture by Michael Crichton Heartland Institute

I have spent my life in the maths and sciences, so there is nothing you could possibly comprehend that I wouldn't. This much we have learned many times on this forum.

The musings of a science fiction writer is not how a scientific theory is debunked. Sorry! Crichton has committed serious errors in previous papers. He has no serious standing in the community.
A scientific theory requires evidence to support the theory or better yet the hypothesis that turns into the theory requires testing and observed results of testing that proves the hypothesis and then it becomes a theory. Now, do you have any evidence to support global warming is caused by CO2?
Are the volumes upon volumes of evidence provided by science unavailable to you that you need me to funnel it to you, or have you been clamping your hands over your eyes all this time?

What happens when you do a search for the evidence? Does the government intercept your request and throw up a 404 page?

I cannot think of a rational explanation for why you have failed to encounter this evidence up to this point.
just post up one of those. Or can't you do that? Just curious. One can write anything on a message board it's something else to back up the statements. So provide one. Just one that validates that adding 120 PPM of CO2 changes temperatures. That one is the one I'd prefer to see.
Mr. jc, this has been posted many, many times. It is a site of the largest scientific society on this planet, the American Institute of Physics, and it explains the history of the science concerning GHGs in the atmosphere.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Perhaps you should actually read something, rather than just regurgitating the same old nonsense that you do constantly. There is no doubt in the scientific community as to the cause of the warming.
 
Francis is Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, and he is infallible when he speaks ex cathedra on faith and morals.

Global warming is not a faith issue and it is not a morals issue. It is a politicized and fraudulent attack on the world economy to force a global, socialist solution to a problem that really doesn't exist.

Why would socialists want to attack the world economy?

OK --- How abot Socialism ITSELF is an attack on our economic system?
You understand better now?
Mr. Flacaltenn, since a good part of our system of government and commerce is socialistic, as is everybody else's that are not economic failures, how is socialism an attack on our system? From the National Park System, to the Armed Services, socialism is a part of our system. That you cannot see this only addresses your intellectual problems, not those of the sane portion of our voting population.
 
I am old enough to remember "global cooling", "nuclear winter", and the crisis that the Earth was running out of fossil fuels.

All of these ginned up crises were lies, plain and simple.
Mr. Blackrook, you are not old enough to remember the scientific community going along with 'global cooling' because that never happened. While there was some debate concerning the dimming effect of the aerosols, the majority of papers even in the '70's stated that the big danger was from the warming effects of the GHG's.
 
Francis is Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, and he is infallible when he speaks ex cathedra on faith and morals.

Global warming is not a faith issue and it is not a morals issue. It is a politicized and fraudulent attack on the world economy to force a global, socialist solution to a problem that really doesn't exist.

Why would socialists want to attack the world economy?

OK --- How abot Socialism ITSELF is an attack on our economic system?
You understand better now?
Mr. Flacaltenn, since a good part of our system of government and commerce is socialistic, as is everybody else's that are not economic failures, how is socialism an attack on our system? From the National Park System, to the Armed Services, socialism is a part of our system. That you cannot see this only addresses your intellectual problems, not those of the sane portion of our voting population.


I can ALMOST justify the military and the National Park system within the guidelines of the US Constitution.. I CANNOT however, justify the seizure of entire industries or sectors of economy there. Nor is there room for the "moral distribution" of our wealth to other countries because we are delevoped and they are not.

Similarly, I see no permissions for us to practice Economic Imperialism and FORCE other countries to comply with our concepts of enviro or labor laws...
 

Forum List

Back
Top