Perhaps the most outrageous of all of Obama's endless lies

[P@triot]

The Obama Administration turned down the request for proper security on dozens and dozens of occasions. No less than 9 different RSO's (Regional Security Officers who rotated through that facility) pleaded for the proper security measures for the Benghazi safe house. All of it was ignored by Obama and Hillary Clinton. When their own people were brutally murdered - the Obama Administration immediately pissed on their graves and their memories by knowingly lying about situation and falsely claiming it was a "YouTube protest" so they could cover their own ass against their egregious negligence.

The logic that is laughable. Why would "protestors" randomly target an unknown facility which just happened to have Americans inside and who had NOTHING to do with the YouTube video? It was targeted after intelligence indicated that facility was being utilized by America for black ops (they were using it to over see operations for arming terrorists for the uprising in Libya and once Gaddafi was overthrown, the terrorists turned on us like rapid wolves).

“On September 16 the Libyan president, Mohammed Magariaf, announced that the attack on the Benghazi Mission was planned many months in advance: “The idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous... this was a pre-calculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate.”

Excerpt From: Jones, Morgan. “The Embassy House.” Threshold Editions. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright. Check out this book on the iBooks Store: iTunes

“The FBI guy asked me a bunch more probing questions - “What did you think of the RSOs?”
“Utterly faultless. They were brilliant and they worked tirelessly in tough, shitty conditions. They continuously asked for more manpower, weaponry, and equipment and they were continuously denied.” I caught the eye of the guy from the State Department. “If they’d got it we wouldn’t be here now, obviously.”

Excerpt From: Jones, Morgan. “The Embassy House.” Threshold Editions. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright. Check out this book on the iBooks Store: iTunes

 

[KNB]

https://www.google.com/search?q=al-janabi+lied&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb

 

[Indeependent]

Show me a department of any organization that doesn't desperatley "need" more funding.

 

[Sallow]

Link to this alleged pissing?

 

[Moonglow]

The Obama Administration turned down the request for proper security on dozens and dozens of occasions. No less than 9 different RSO's (Regional Security Officers who rotated through that facility) pleaded for the proper security measures for the Benghazi safe house. All of it was ignored by Obama and Hillary Clinton

You do know what the chain of command is?? It does not start at the top..

 

[Sallow]

Show me a department of any organization that doesn't desperatley "need" more funding.

You gotta wonder why all these folks who were "begging and pleading" for more security were doing in a dangerous place like Benghazi.

Especially on September 11 just after a criminal made a film that shitted on the religion in the region and put it on youtube..

 

[bedowin62]

Show me a department of any organization that doesn't desperatley "need" more funding.

You gotta wonder why all these folks who were "begging and pleading" for more security were doing in a dangerous place like Benghazi.

Especially on September 11 just after a criminal made a film that shitted on the religion in the region and put it on youtube..

still going with the tired, debunked talking points huh?

YAWN
oh and there were there because obama wanted theme there genius; other countries recognized the deteriorating situation and pulled out. and it wasnt because of some vidoe


libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[P@triot]

Link to this alleged pissing?

It's clearly cited above my friend and I added a link. The fact that you missed that really makes me wonder about your mental capacity to engage on this board. You're either not reading what is posted or you're too slow to digest it properly. Either way.....

 

[ClosedCaption]

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money | Mother Jones

I see that Darrell Issa might have a wee problem on his hands when he holds his hearings today about inadequate security at the Benghazi consulate. Dana Milbank reports:

House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

That's the problem with budget cutting: it sounds great when you're thumping tubs on the campaign trail in front of adoring tea party crowds, but when the actual work of governing comes up, those cuts have to come from actual programs that do actual things. Like protecting our embassies.

Same thing with ACA...Oppose it, say it doesnt work then fund campaigns to strip medicare

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/19/u...-focus-of-effort-to-foil-health-care-law.html

Ensuring Embassies and ACA wont work properly. Thats the problem with cutting budgets...it sounds good until something happens then everyone says "not it"

 

[P@triot]

Show me a department of any organization that doesn't desperatley "need" more funding.

You gotta wonder why all these folks who were "begging and pleading" for more security were doing in a dangerous place like Benghazi.

Especially on September 11 just after a criminal made a film that shitted on the religion in the region and put it on youtube..

Um...they were ordered to be there junior, by Obama....

Are you on some illegal substance this afternoon? You're not even coherent right now...

 

[P@triot]

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money | Mother Jones

I see that Darrell Issa might have a wee problem on his hands when he holds his hearings today about inadequate security at the Benghazi consulate. Dana Milbank reports:

House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

That's the problem with budget cutting: it sounds great when you're thumping tubs on the campaign trail in front of adoring tea party crowds, but when the actual work of governing comes up, those cuts have to come from actual programs that do actual things. Like protecting our embassies.

Same thing with ACA...Oppose it, say it doesnt work then fund campaigns to strip medicare

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/19/u...-focus-of-effort-to-foil-health-care-law.html

Ensuring Embassies and ACA wont work properly. Thats the problem with cutting budgets...it sounds good until something happens then everyone says "not it"

Sorry chief - you can't blame "cutting budgets". Obama is the man in charge. If the money wasn't there to properly fund security, then you don't run the black op. You pull out (just like every other nation in the world did).

That's what Dumbocrats can't comprehend (and is a major illustration of their limited mental capacity) - if you don't have the money to do something, then you don't do it. Not rocket science!

 

[Moonglow]

Show me a department of any organization that doesn't desperatley "need" more funding.

You gotta wonder why all these folks who were "begging and pleading" for more security were doing in a dangerous place like Benghazi.

Especially on September 11 just after a criminal made a film that shitted on the religion in the region and put it on youtube..

Um...they were ordered to be there junior, by Obama....

Are you on some illegal substance this afternoon? You're not even coherent right now...

The security detail now is suppose to be provided by the host nation...

 

[Moonglow]

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money | Mother Jones

I see that Darrell Issa might have a wee problem on his hands when he holds his hearings today about inadequate security at the Benghazi consulate. Dana Milbank reports:

House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

That's the problem with budget cutting: it sounds great when you're thumping tubs on the campaign trail in front of adoring tea party crowds, but when the actual work of governing comes up, those cuts have to come from actual programs that do actual things. Like protecting our embassies.

Same thing with ACA...Oppose it, say it doesnt work then fund campaigns to strip medicare

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/19/u...-focus-of-effort-to-foil-health-care-law.html

Ensuring Embassies and ACA wont work properly. Thats the problem with cutting budgets...it sounds good until something happens then everyone says "not it"

Sorry chief - you can't blame "cutting budgets". Obama is the man in charge. If the money wasn't there to properly fund security, then you don't run the black op. You pull out (just like every other nation in the world did).

That's what Dumbocrats can't comprehend (and is a major illustration of their limited mental capacity) - if you don't have the money to do something, then you don't do it. Not rocket science!

And the CIA said no to more security also......

 

[P@triot]

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money | Mother Jones

Same thing with ACA...Oppose it, say it doesnt work then fund campaigns to strip medicare

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/19/u...-focus-of-effort-to-foil-health-care-law.html

Ensuring Embassies and ACA wont work properly. Thats the problem with cutting budgets...it sounds good until something happens then everyone says "not it"

Sorry chief - you can't blame "cutting budgets". Obama is the man in charge. If the money wasn't there to properly fund security, then you don't run the black op. You pull out (just like every other nation in the world did).

That's what Dumbocrats can't comprehend (and is a major illustration of their limited mental capacity) - if you don't have the money to do something, then you don't do it. Not rocket science!

And the CIA said no to more security also......

And remind me again who the CIA answers to.....?

 

[Moonglow]

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money | Mother Jones

I see that Darrell Issa might have a wee problem on his hands when he holds his hearings today about inadequate security at the Benghazi consulate. Dana Milbank reports:

House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

That's the problem with budget cutting: it sounds great when you're thumping tubs on the campaign trail in front of adoring tea party crowds, but when the actual work of governing comes up, those cuts have to come from actual programs that do actual things. Like protecting our embassies.

Same thing with ACA...Oppose it, say it doesnt work then fund campaigns to strip medicare

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/19/u...-focus-of-effort-to-foil-health-care-law.html

Ensuring Embassies and ACA wont work properly. Thats the problem with cutting budgets...it sounds good until something happens then everyone says "not it"

Sorry chief - you can't blame "cutting budgets". Obama is the man in charge. If the money wasn't there to properly fund security, then you don't run the black op. You pull out (just like every other nation in the world did).

That's what Dumbocrats can't comprehend (and is a major illustration of their limited mental capacity) - if you don't have the money to do something, then you don't do it. Not rocket science!

That idea would have worked well during the American Revolutionary war now wouldn't it??

 

[DriftingSand]

The Obama Administration turned down the request for proper security on dozens and dozens of occasions. No less than 9 different RSO's (Regional Security Officers who rotated through that facility) pleaded for the proper security measures for the Benghazi safe house. All of it was ignored by Obama and Hillary Clinton. When their own people were brutally murdered - the Obama Administration immediately pissed on their graves and their memories by knowingly lying about situation and falsely claiming it was a "YouTube protest" so they could cover their own ass against their egregious negligence.

The logic that is laughable. Why would "protestors" randomly target an unknown facility which just happened to have Americans inside and who had NOTHING to do with the YouTube video? It was targeted after intelligence indicated that facility was being utilized by America for black ops (they were using it to over see operations for arming terrorists for the uprising in Libya and once Gaddafi was overthrown, the terrorists turned on us like rapid wolves).

“On September 16 the Libyan president, Mohammed Magariaf, announced that the attack on the Benghazi Mission was planned many months in advance: “The idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous... this was a pre-calculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate.”

Excerpt From: Jones, Morgan. “The Embassy House.” Threshold Editions. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright. Check out this book on the iBooks Store: iTunes

“The FBI guy asked me a bunch more probing questions - “What did you think of the RSOs?”
“Utterly faultless. They were brilliant and they worked tirelessly in tough, shitty conditions. They continuously asked for more manpower, weaponry, and equipment and they were continuously denied.” I caught the eye of the guy from the State Department. “If they’d got it we wouldn’t be here now, obviously.”

Excerpt From: Jones, Morgan. “The Embassy House.” Threshold Editions. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright. Check out this book on the iBooks Store: iTunes

Obama was an out-and-out liar before he was elected. The one that most bugs me was his promise of "transparency." He's anything but transparent (except for the fact that we can expect him to lie to us).

 

[g5000]

I bet most every overseas US diplomatic mission has made multiple requests for more security. Including the ten that were attacked on Bush's watch.

I seriously doubt a backwater consulate in Benghazi was the only one.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money | Mother Jones

I see that Darrell Issa might have a wee problem on his hands when he holds his hearings today about inadequate security at the Benghazi consulate. Dana Milbank reports:

House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

That's the problem with budget cutting: it sounds great when you're thumping tubs on the campaign trail in front of adoring tea party crowds, but when the actual work of governing comes up, those cuts have to come from actual programs that do actual things. Like protecting our embassies.

Same thing with ACA...Oppose it, say it doesnt work then fund campaigns to strip medicare

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/19/u...-focus-of-effort-to-foil-health-care-law.html

Ensuring Embassies and ACA wont work properly. Thats the problem with cutting budgets...it sounds good until something happens then everyone says "not it"

Sorry chief - you can't blame "cutting budgets". Obama is the man in charge. If the money wasn't there to properly fund security, then you don't run the black op. You pull out (just like every other nation in the world did).

That's what Dumbocrats can't comprehend (and is a major illustration of their limited mental capacity) - if you don't have the money to do something, then you don't do it. Not rocket science!

Man in charge has nothing to do with money to protect it. Obama asked for more and republicans said no.

Think about it like this. Repubs dont object to a cake they object to the number of eggs Obama wants to use. Then when the cake (embassy) comes out bad they pretend the eggs dont matter. Obama should magically make the cake "work"

 

[Moonglow]

Sorry chief - you can't blame "cutting budgets". Obama is the man in charge. If the money wasn't there to properly fund security, then you don't run the black op. You pull out (just like every other nation in the world did).

That's what Dumbocrats can't comprehend (and is a major illustration of their limited mental capacity) - if you don't have the money to do something, then you don't do it. Not rocket science!

And the CIA said no to more security also......

And remind me again who the CIA answers to.....?

but, at the level that they were denied is not a presidential one, you are confusing how things operate, try joining the military and getting back to me when you have a clearer mind on the subject and a little life experience...

 

[Moonglow]

The Obama Administration turned down the request for proper security on dozens and dozens of occasions. No less than 9 different RSO's (Regional Security Officers who rotated through that facility) pleaded for the proper security measures for the Benghazi safe house. All of it was ignored by Obama and Hillary Clinton. When their own people were brutally murdered - the Obama Administration immediately pissed on their graves and their memories by knowingly lying about situation and falsely claiming it was a "YouTube protest" so they could cover their own ass against their egregious negligence.

The logic that is laughable. Why would "protestors" randomly target an unknown facility which just happened to have Americans inside and who had NOTHING to do with the YouTube video? It was targeted after intelligence indicated that facility was being utilized by America for black ops (they were using it to over see operations for arming terrorists for the uprising in Libya and once Gaddafi was overthrown, the terrorists turned on us like rapid wolves).

“On September 16 the Libyan president, Mohammed Magariaf, announced that the attack on the Benghazi Mission was planned many months in advance: “The idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous... this was a pre-calculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate.”

Excerpt From: Jones, Morgan. “The Embassy House.” Threshold Editions. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright. Check out this book on the iBooks Store: iTunes

“The FBI guy asked me a bunch more probing questions - “What did you think of the RSOs?”
“Utterly faultless. They were brilliant and they worked tirelessly in tough, shitty conditions. They continuously asked for more manpower, weaponry, and equipment and they were continuously denied.” I caught the eye of the guy from the State Department. “If they’d got it we wouldn’t be here now, obviously.”

Excerpt From: Jones, Morgan. “The Embassy House.” Threshold Editions. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright. Check out this book on the iBooks Store: iTunes

Obama was an out-and-out liar before he was elected. The one that most bugs me was his promise of "transparency." He's anything but transparent (except for the fact that we can expect him to lie to us).

you must see through Oblama, you use a lot of derogatory language about him, that only someone close would know about another human..