jreeves
Senior Member
- Feb 12, 2008
- 6,588
- 319
- 48
you need to read the resolution, hostility and a willingness to attack was one of the rationalizations listed in the plethora of "whereas" paragraphs that started that resolution. to state that it was THE reason is patently false. The resolutions contains many such reasons.
And you really have no reason to insult my intelligence. I have made my point and continue to make it. And the resolution clearly bears it out.
:
The resolution clearly bears what you see through your obvious blinders.
The whole purpose of this thread was that there was no evidence that Saddam tried to kill Bush Sr., Clinton proved DCD wrong. So if you want to keep arguing in circles go right on ahead. I shouldn't have insulted your intelligence, only the absurdity of your argument.