Pentagon: Ex-detainees returning to fight

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Gunny, May 7, 2008.

  1. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    more ... http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/05/07/gitmo.bomber/index.html
     
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,586
    Thanks Received:
    5,906
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,012
  3. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    I new the "we drove him to it" was coming when I posted the article.
     
  4. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    13,013
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,439
    Or maybe we just should have tried people and put them away.
     
  5. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    Maybe. Maybe this is a new kind of war that doesn't work too well with the rules of conventional war and they're still working on something that does. Prisoners of War are held for the duration of the war then released and not cahrged with crimes unless specific allegations of crimes have been made against individuals.

    From a military viewpoint, sending potential enemies back prior to the conclusion of a war so they can resume waging war against you is beyond dumb. Reinforcing the enemies ranks is NOT a sound tactic of warfare.
     
  6. dread
    Offline

    dread Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    603
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings:
    +43
  7. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    13,013
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,439
  8. dread
    Offline

    dread Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    603
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings:
    +43


    Yes they were. Its called being an enemy combatant.
     
  9. Larkinn
    Offline

    Larkinn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,598
    Thanks Received:
    174
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +175
    Thats not a crime. They weren't charged with anything, they were accused of actions, but not charged. See charging actually requires something called evidence, or you get laughed out of court. Accusing requires pretty much nothing.
     
  10. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    Again, prisoners of war aren't charged with crimes.

    The fact is, not charging soldiers in a war with crimes for fighting in the war works to their advantage rather than harm them as has been continually pushed. Most will go free.

    The alternative is to charge each with being a terrorist and/or aiding terrorists/terrorist organizations in which case you would have more people serving actual prison sentences/sitting on death row. The punishment for those crimes is far more severe than participating in a war.

    Those charged with actual war crimes, unless they are our own, have not been tried until the conclusion of the war.

    I don't know that there is an actual solution in dealing with this situation. Conventional rules don't apply. The war itself is not conventional. But to treat these people better than our own people, and allow them US Constitutional Rights is BS to me, and just allowing them to exploit yet another of out weaknesses against us.
     

Share This Page