Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling

[MisterBeale]

wow, look at all these big government folks wanting the Feds to overrule the states

Help America Vote Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Meister]

There's no reason to lose faith in the process. If you write your signature on a ballot certifying your vote and it gets rejected because you wrote it in pencil instead of ink, or because you wrote it in green ink instead of blue or black, that's not a valid reason to reject a ballot. In fact rejecting a ballot generally has to be for some material reason.

What? Show me where the color of the ink was the defining issue

 

[j-mac]

We all know what this is about…This is about the democrat SOS, the democrat governor, and the democrat 3rd circuit saying ‘we’re going to cheat’ to install another brain addled Marxist.

 

[AMart]

This is exactly why the state apparatus has to be removed from dem hands.....Shooting wars have started for less.

They need to be arrested now.

 

[multivita-man]

What? Show me where the color of the ink was the defining issue

Hypothetical example.

The voting rights act of 65 says states can't reject ballots for frivolous reasons.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Does this increase or decrease citizens faith in elections? Will your DOJ get involved?

Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling

Pennsylvania election officials have been instructed to count ballots arriving in undated envelopes despite a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.

www.foxnews.com

Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling​

A top election official in Pennsylvania says the state will disregard the U.S. Supreme Court's guidance on counting mail-in ballots arriving in envelopes with typos or incorrect dates, saying that the state's Commonwealth Court has already established the practice as licit.

Pennsylvania's election laws have historically required voters to include a signature and date on the outside of return envelopes when voting by mail.

However, acting Secretary of State Leigh Chapman announced that Pennsylvania election officials should continue counting ballots that arrive with improperly filled-out envelopes, in accordance with the Commonwealth Court's previous ruling on the matter.

I have a solution.

Disband the FedGov.

 

[1srelluc]

Okay, but you can still buy a gun, eh?

A class III weapon/suppressor?......Not till you pay $200 and get a tax stamp from the ATF.

Oh you pay for it from a Class III dealer but you can't pick it up till Uncle Sugar sends you a tax stamp in the mail......Six or eight months later....If you are lucky.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The ATF rejects the various Class III weapon forms for typos all the time.

Another organization we should disband.

 

[Meister]

Hypothetical example.

The voting rights act of 65 says states can't reject ballots for frivolous reasons.

Signatures and dates are frivolous?
got it

 

[The Duke]

The states have the right to make their own election laws.

What does that state's legislature say about that?

 

[The Duke]

Another organization we should disband.

Should have been disbanded when prohibition was over.

 

[scruffy]

The states have the right to make their own election laws.

SUBJECT TO the United States Constitution.

States do NOT have the right to ignore Supreme Court rulings

 

[scruffy]

Yup, especially with Oz catching up to Fetterman.
Fetterman had a bad day yesterday in front of the camera.
The dems need to start setting the process to muck up the election

We have people watching in Pennsylvania

It's a nasty place. Things could get nasty.

 

[scruffy]

There's nothing binding in the SCOTUS opinion.

Bullshit. Democrats are lawless law breaking motherfuckers, and I already told you what's going to happen next time I see a rioter. Draw your own conclusions

 

[BlindBoo]

Democrats are lawless law breaking motherfuckers

It was a bipartisan group of geriatric voters who forgot to scribble the date on the outer envelope that originally sued using the Voting right act. Hardly "law breaking motherfuckers". I dare say " law breaking motherfuckers" don't rely on Courts do they? Benedict Donald and his MAGAMOB are a prime example of " law breaking motherfuckers" who have no use for the courts or law and order, imho.

 

[Curried Goats]

This is exactly why the state apparatus has to be removed from dem hands.....Shooting wars have started for less.

Yea but those people had balls and you don't so simmer down.

 

[Curried Goats]

We have people watching in Pennsylvania

It's a nasty place. Things could get nasty.

Fuck around and find out cosplayer.

 

[scruffy]

It was a bipartisan group of geriatric voters who forgot to scribble the date on the outer envelope that originally sued using the Voting right act.

lmao

Gee, I wonder who put them up to it.

(Not).

Hardly "law breaking motherfuckers". I dare say " law breaking motherfuckers" don't rely on Courts do they? Benedict Donald and his MAGAMOB are a prime example of " law breaking motherfuckers" who have no use for the courts or law and order, imho.

TDS again?

Shit's getting old.

Don't you have anything else?

 

[Moonglow]

SUBJECT TO the United States Constitution.

States do NOT have the right to ignore Supreme Court rulings

Not according to the Constitution, the USSC over ruled a valid action, which shows the conservative led court is stepping over it's boundaries.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Not according to the Constitution, the USSC over ruled a valid action, which shows the conservative led court is stepping over it's boundaries.

Wrong as usual the Supreme Court is the final word in what is legal and Constitutional.