- Sep 16, 2012
- 58,974
- 52,663
- 3,605
wow, look at all these big government folks wanting the Feds to overrule the states
Help America Vote Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wow, look at all these big government folks wanting the Feds to overrule the states
What? Show me where the color of the ink was the defining issueThere's no reason to lose faith in the process. If you write your signature on a ballot certifying your vote and it gets rejected because you wrote it in pencil instead of ink, or because you wrote it in green ink instead of blue or black, that's not a valid reason to reject a ballot. In fact rejecting a ballot generally has to be for some material reason.
They need to be arrested now.This is exactly why the state apparatus has to be removed from dem hands.....Shooting wars have started for less.
What? Show me where the color of the ink was the defining issue
I have a solution.Does this increase or decrease citizens faith in elections? Will your DOJ get involved?
Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling
Pennsylvania election officials have been instructed to count ballots arriving in undated envelopes despite a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.www.foxnews.com
Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling
A top election official in Pennsylvania says the state will disregard the U.S. Supreme Court's guidance on counting mail-in ballots arriving in envelopes with typos or incorrect dates, saying that the state's Commonwealth Court has already established the practice as licit.
Pennsylvania's election laws have historically required voters to include a signature and date on the outside of return envelopes when voting by mail.
However, acting Secretary of State Leigh Chapman announced that Pennsylvania election officials should continue counting ballots that arrive with improperly filled-out envelopes, in accordance with the Commonwealth Court's previous ruling on the matter.
A class III weapon/suppressor?......Not till you pay $200 and get a tax stamp from the ATF.Okay, but you can still buy a gun, eh?
Another organization we should disband.The ATF rejects the various Class III weapon forms for typos all the time.
Hypothetical example.
The voting rights act of 65 says states can't reject ballots for frivolous reasons.
What does that state's legislature say about that?The states have the right to make their own election laws.
Should have been disbanded when prohibition was over.Another organization we should disband.
SUBJECT TO the United States Constitution.The states have the right to make their own election laws.
We have people watching in PennsylvaniaYup, especially with Oz catching up to Fetterman.
Fetterman had a bad day yesterday in front of the camera.
The dems need to start setting the process to muck up the election
There's nothing binding in the SCOTUS opinion.
It was a bipartisan group of geriatric voters who forgot to scribble the date on the outer envelope that originally sued using the Voting right act. Hardly "law breaking motherfuckers". I dare say " law breaking motherfuckers" don't rely on Courts do they? Benedict Donald and his MAGAMOB are a prime example of " law breaking motherfuckers" who have no use for the courts or law and order, imho.Democrats are lawless law breaking motherfuckers
Yea but those people had balls and you don't so simmer down.This is exactly why the state apparatus has to be removed from dem hands.....Shooting wars have started for less.
We have people watching in Pennsylvania
It's a nasty place. Things could get nasty.
It was a bipartisan group of geriatric voters who forgot to scribble the date on the outer envelope that originally sued using the Voting right act.
Hardly "law breaking motherfuckers". I dare say " law breaking motherfuckers" don't rely on Courts do they? Benedict Donald and his MAGAMOB are a prime example of " law breaking motherfuckers" who have no use for the courts or law and order, imho.
Not according to the Constitution, the USSC over ruled a valid action, which shows the conservative led court is stepping over it's boundaries.SUBJECT TO the United States Constitution.
States do NOT have the right to ignore Supreme Court rulings
Wrong as usual the Supreme Court is the final word in what is legal and Constitutional.Not according to the Constitution, the USSC over ruled a valid action, which shows the conservative led court is stepping over it's boundaries.