Do you find the sound of the breeze whistling through your head relaxing or a distraction?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do you find the sound of the breeze whistling through your head relaxing or a distraction?
The subject is the peer review process for real science.
And most of you confirmed that it is science that turns you totally off.
The subject is the peer review process for real science.
And most of you confirmed that it is science that turns you totally off.
I keep making the same points. If the data is not reproducible, there is nothing for peers to review. If both sides of the review process are paid to produce the same result, there is not honest review.
the way global warming science works is not independent honest review, but mutual masturbation.
I just read the link that Old Rocks posted, and it's crap, because the article assumes that academics would never engage in the sort of behavior that others engage in, and I think that that premise is demonstrably false.
The subject is the peer review process for real science.
And most of you confirmed that it is science that turns you totally off.
I keep making the same points. If the data is not reproducible, there is nothing for peers to review. If both sides of the review process are paid to produce the same result, there is not honest review.
the way global warming science works is not independent honest review, but mutual masturbation.
The subject is the peer review process for real science.
And most of you confirmed that it is science that turns you totally off.
I keep making the same points. If the data is not reproducible, there is nothing for peers to review. If both sides of the review process are paid to produce the same result, there is not honest review.
the way global warming science works is not independent honest review, but mutual masturbation.
Here are a few places that you can find the proxy data, free, and available to all.
NOAA Paleoclimatology Global Warming - The Story
Global Warming in a Nutshell Part 3 of 4 - Proxy Measurements of Climate Data
Paleoclimate; Ice Core and Lake Sediment Records
This is massive amounts of data, data available to all. Now if you wish to use it to make a logical arguement concerning the present warming using this data, you are welcome to do that. But to state the data does not exist is to ignore reality. To state that all the data from thousands of scientists from all over the world is corrupted is to engage in conspiracy theories worth of the 9-11 kooks.
Maybe it's be, but I swear that this chart from one of the sites Old Rocks posted shows temperatures plummeting between 1950-2000.
I keep losing my contact lenses, it's the weirdest thing, one minute it's in my eye, the next - gone. That happened again today, so maybe that's whats causing me to see the plunge in temperature.
Can I get peer review?
The subject is the peer review process for real science.
And most of you confirmed that it is science that turns you totally off.
I keep making the same points. If the data is not reproducible, there is nothing for peers to review. If both sides of the review process are paid to produce the same result, there is not honest review.
the way global warming science works is not independent honest review, but mutual masturbation.
Who says the data isn't reproducible. Sounds like a meme started in one corner that now is supposed to cover all thye data. No one is paid to produce a result. That's also a meme created by the Climategate hoaxers to cover their gross misinterpretation of stolen, private emails.
The subject is the peer review process for real science.
And most of you confirmed that it is science that turns you totally off.
I keep making the same points. If the data is not reproducible, there is nothing for peers to review. If both sides of the review process are paid to produce the same result, there is not honest review.
the way global warming science works is not independent honest review, but mutual masturbation.
Here are a few places that you can find the proxy data, free, and available to all.
NOAA Paleoclimatology Global Warming - The Story
Global Warming in a Nutshell Part 3 of 4 - Proxy Measurements of Climate Data
Paleoclimate; Ice Core and Lake Sediment Records
This is massive amounts of data, data available to all. Now if you wish to use it to make a logical arguement concerning the present warming using this data, you are welcome to do that. But to state the data does not exist is to ignore reality. To state that all the data from thousands of scientists from all over the world is corrupted is to engage in conspiracy theories worth of the 9-11 kooks.
I just read the link that Old Rocks posted, and it's crap, because the article assumes that academics would never engage in the sort of behavior that others engage in, and I think that that premise is demonstrably false.
I just read the link that Old Rocks posted, and it's crap, because the article assumes that academics would never engage in the sort of behavior that others engage in, and I think that that premise is demonstrably false.
I just read the link that Old Rocks posted, and it's crap, because the article assumes that academics would never engage in the sort of behavior that others engage in, and I think that that premise is demonstrably false.
Then demonstrate it. Without that your post is a waste of time. Even those that don't believe we're warming as rapidly as some say would admit, if the historical concentrations of CO2 were doubled, we WOULD have warming.