Bloodrock44
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #161
P F Tinmore, et al,
Well, we have to disagree here.
(COMMENT)A state should have a defined territory. Israel does not have a defined territory. Israel sits inside armistice lines. Armistice lines are specifically not to be political or territorial boundaries.
There is no "pretend" about it.
Again, it really doesn't matter. For all practical purpose, everyone is using the lines for that purpose, until a solution is resolved. Since the Palestinians don't want a solution, the Occupation can go on indefinitely.
(COMMENT)Thanks, this is a good read. It shows 65 years of worthless monkey motions by the UN and no peace in sight.
It is a good reason to promote BDS.
The same process worked for every nation in the region except for the Arabs in Palestine. The 65 years of conflict was purely at the discretion of the Palestinians and the Arab League. It was they who rejected the opportunity for an Arab State, and it was they that provoked war.
At some point, the Arab Palestinian must take the responsibility and assume the consequences for their actions.
Most Respectfully,
R
Not true.
The Palestinians were at home minding their own business when foreigners went to Palestine and started a war.
You sure about that? Seems to me that the arabs declared war a day after Israel was given statehood and the arabs declined statehood. Like they say "never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity".