Gardener, et al,
Once the terms and conditions of the San Remo Agreement were set and met through the League of Nation Covenant and the Mandate of Palestine, the San Remo Agreement was fulfilled. Thereafter, the Covenant and the Mandate became the legacy requirements.
As the Covenant and the Mandate became the legacy requirements, the intent of the San Remo Convention became an evolving drama. Once the League dissolved into its successor organization (the UN) and the Mandate terminated into its successor (the UNPC), the San Remo Agreement, then twice removed, had no enforceable reach. It became a "document of precedence" (historical reference). At the outbreak of hostilities and the invasion by external forces (Arab League), the military outcome became the most significant factor.
It should be noted that the key rights of the Arab Palestinian are still recognized.
Since the time of the San Remo Convention, and the legacy implementors of the Covenant and Mandate, there have been:
Most Respectfully,
R
Once the terms and conditions of the San Remo Agreement were set and met through the League of Nation Covenant and the Mandate of Palestine, the San Remo Agreement was fulfilled. Thereafter, the Covenant and the Mandate became the legacy requirements.
(COMMENT)[MENTION=25033]RoccoR[/MENTION] - the San Remo Conference resolution says this
------To accept the terms of the Mandates Article as given below with reference to Palestine, on the understanding that there was inserted in the process-verbal an undertaking by the Mandatory Power that this would not involve the surrender of the rights hitherto enjoyed by the non-Jewish communities in Palestine------
-----in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine--------
why did the Jews violate these stipuilations? why do the jews continue to violate these stipulations in Israel and in nthe West Bank?
please explain to me why the promises of a jewish home in palestine should be respectyed while the promises of protection of non-jewish rights in palestine are stepped upon and ignored daily?
As the Covenant and the Mandate became the legacy requirements, the intent of the San Remo Convention became an evolving drama. Once the League dissolved into its successor organization (the UN) and the Mandate terminated into its successor (the UNPC), the San Remo Agreement, then twice removed, had no enforceable reach. It became a "document of precedence" (historical reference). At the outbreak of hostilities and the invasion by external forces (Arab League), the military outcome became the most significant factor.
It should be noted that the key rights of the Arab Palestinian are still recognized.
- The protection of civil rights.
- The protection of religious rights.
- The right to self-determination.
- The State of Israel.
- The State of Palestine.
Since the time of the San Remo Convention, and the legacy implementors of the Covenant and Mandate, there have been:
- The replacement institutions.
- The Partition Plan
- Three Wars
- Two Intifada
- Armistice Lines
- Thousands of Asymmetric Attacks
- Hundreds of UN Resolutions
- Oslo Accords I and II
- And the establishment of the State of Palestine.
Most Respectfully,
R