Palin Crashing Obama Surging?

[Revere]

She's on the right side of almost every issue, and the only one to take on Obama directly.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The reason Soros fired Obama and will not run him again in 2012 is that he has presided over the worst economy since the Great Depression AND has provided Palin with an inexhaustible supply of one-liners that would devastate him in any debate.

Obama will not be the Dem running against Palin in 2012

 

[Revere]

Let's see. She opposes Cap and Tax, Obamacare, domestic oil drilling bans.

Which one of those issues are "stupid?" Which ones are out of step with what Americans want?

 

[Synthaholic]

Hilarious!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYQLD0Kpmsk[/ame]

 

[Synthaholic]

Let's see. She opposes Cap and Tax, Obamacare, domestic oil drilling bans.

Which one of those issues are "stupid?" Which ones are out of step with what Americans want?

All of them.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjGhy8LVwAo[/ame]

 

[ABikerSailor]

Ironically enough, I think that the most damage for Palin is going to come FROM Palin, in the form of her show "Sarah Palin's Alaska".

Not only does she use this as a way to "prove" that she's an outdoors person (she can't shoot for shit), but she also makes gaffes like when she misquoted Mrs. Obama by saying that she'd said that nobody should eat dessert.

However.......her gaffe of "refudiate" and her coining new words was also on there, and it made the news......

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEKQss7myeQ[/ame]

She stated that she mistyped the "f" when she should have used a "d".

What the fuck does "redudiate" mean? Is she asking the "first dude" Todd to redo something to defend her?

Face it..........Sarah Palin is not presidential material. She's barely passable as a human being.

 

[WillowTree]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjGhy8LVwAo

I love that video. Left the dude speechless didn't he.

 

[WillowTree]

Ironically enough, I think that the most damage for Palin is going to come FROM Palin, in the form of her show "Sarah Palin's Alaska".

Not only does she use this as a way to "prove" that she's an outdoors person (she can't shoot for shit), but she also makes gaffes like when she misquoted Mrs. Obama by saying that she'd said that nobody should eat dessert.

However.......her gaffe of "refudiate" and her coining new words was also on there, and it made the news......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEKQss7myeQ

She stated that she mistyped the "f" when she should have used a "d".

What the fuck does "redudiate" mean? Is she asking the "first dude" Todd to redo something to defend her?

Face it..........Sarah Palin is not presidential material. She's barely passable as a human being.

IRONY ALERT IRONY ALERT

 

[Vanquish]

It's hard, to nearly impossible to get "valid case law".

Why?

Judges are put in place by politicans or by running on a party ticket.

Judges are people. Why do you think we are having obamacare declared OK in one state and unconstitutional in another?

so you're saying that the constitution which gives final power to determine constitutionality to the courts should be ignored?

No, of course not, not even close.

This is easy to explain.

How pissed were you when the SCOTUS gave equal rights to corporations?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you were livid.
But the courts said it's OK. Does that mean you have to support that?
It got passed in court by people that specialise in the Constitution...

Of course you don't. Judges have opinions on the Constitution, and sadly they can be changed with popular opinion.

Take abortion. It got passed due to the right to privacy. Every Conservative of faith lost thier minds and some that don't have faith.

But it got passed on opinion.

If people want to make/add laws that they think is Constitutional, then they also need to be prepared to remove laws.

It's a strange system that we make work. Majority rules unless one judge says otherwise.

Personnally I'd rather go with Majority rules, win or lose, and leave most of this up to the States.

This is weird. I agree with you to a certain degree, but a lot of what you're saying is just plain wrong.

Yes, laws can change due to political views.
Yes, bad law can be made from the bench.
Yes, politicians and legislature should counteract caselaw if it doesnt fit with what they feel is right

....that having been said...

you can't just throw out the legal system because it's political. people want to cheerlead that america is the best country in the world...that we're fair and we're amazing. I love america too...and part of that "best country in the world stuff" comes from our amazing legal system.

Valid case law gets handed down in every state almost every day. There's no way around some of it being political. The result of that is that not every valid law or valid case law is found in the actual Constitution. sorry, them's the breaks. that's how the founders envisioned and wanted it.

 

[Yurt]

I doubt she'll get on the ticket again, but feel free to refudiate that contention. She's a female Dan Quayle. Hooters can get you only so far.

they can get you all the way with me

 

[jillian]

Hence, I predict NO sitting GOP member of Congress will push to have "Obamacare" repealed. Regardless of the rhetoric they used to fool ths weak minded into voting for them.

i don't know. i think some of the new electees are stupid enough to do it. you think rand paul won't vote to dump things that help people?

I don't have the numbers at hand, but look at Rand's constituency and see how many people will be positively impacted by the whole of Obamacare. KY is not a rich state.

yeah, but the base always votes against their own self-interest.

 

[ABikerSailor]

I doubt she'll get on the ticket again, but feel free to refudiate that contention. She's a female Dan Quayle. Hooters can get you only so far.

they can get you all the way with me

So, looks are more important than brains in your estimation of a leader for this country?

Man you're shallow Squirt.

 

[Affrayer]

Because the large majority of them are very bit as dumb, if not dumber than she is.

But what is truly amazing is that they haven't caught on yet that they are fools...or have they and that's the reason Palin is falling in the polls...

 

[Intense]

so you're saying that the constitution which gives final power to determine constitutionality to the courts should be ignored?

No, of course not, not even close.

This is easy to explain.

How pissed were you when the SCOTUS gave equal rights to corporations?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you were livid.
But the courts said it's OK. Does that mean you have to support that?
It got passed in court by people that specialise in the Constitution...

Of course you don't. Judges have opinions on the Constitution, and sadly they can be changed with popular opinion.

Take abortion. It got passed due to the right to privacy. Every Conservative of faith lost thier minds and some that don't have faith.

But it got passed on opinion.

If people want to make/add laws that they think is Constitutional, then they also need to be prepared to remove laws.

It's a strange system that we make work. Majority rules unless one judge says otherwise.

Personnally I'd rather go with Majority rules, win or lose, and leave most of this up to the States.

This is weird. I agree with you to a certain degree, but a lot of what you're saying is just plain wrong.

Yes, laws can change due to political views.
Yes, bad law can be made from the bench.
Yes, politicians and legislature should counteract caselaw if it doesnt fit with what they feel is right

....that having been said...

you can't just throw out the legal system because it's political. people want to cheerlead that america is the best country in the world...that we're fair and we're amazing. I love america too...and part of that "best country in the world stuff" comes from our amazing legal system.

Valid case law gets handed down in every state almost every day. There's no way around some of it being political. The result of that is that not every valid law or valid case law is found in the actual Constitution. sorry, them's the breaks. that's how the founders envisioned and wanted it.

Very Conservative minded.

 

[Affrayer]

It's delusional accusations like this that prevent civil discourse.

Wow!!! The idea that corporations have rights equal to or greater than individuals is indeed fascist doctrine...there is nothing delusional about pointing out that the right wing Fab Five on the USSC are proponents of fascism.

If you support obama, you support the vile Patriot Act.

What does this have to do with the political bias of the USSC?

Thus implying, using your delusional style of accusations, that all liberals hate privacy and support wire taps w/o due process and support the envasive searches done at airports.

What? Are you really saying that since the right wingers on the USSC follow fascist doctrine that liberals hate privacy?

Perhaps you are simply confused as to how the law works. Let's see if you are. Does "free speech" give you the right to yell fire in a crowded dark theater?

See how quickly this can go from polite to fight?

Flatulence only proves you have gas...it does not establish a cause and affect relationship.

 

[Synthaholic]

i don't know. i think some of the new electees are stupid enough to do it. you think rand paul won't vote to dump things that help people?

I don't have the numbers at hand, but look at Rand's constituency and see how many people will be positively impacted by the whole of Obamacare. KY is not a rich state.

yeah, but the base always votes against their own self-interest.

True in a lot of states. This book explores the issue of populations voting against their interests:

 

[Affrayer]

I predict that one day she will wake up and nobody will care.

All you have to do to be qualified as a republican candidate for president is not get caught having homosexual sex with a live male or heterosexual sex with a dead female. Everyone else is a potential front runner...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sh6Gx1KrvTw[/ame]

 

[WillowTree]

Because the large majority of them are very bit as dumb, if not dumber than she is.

But what is truly amazing is that they haven't caught on yet that they are fools...or have they and that's the reason Palin is falling in the polls...

Yeah! Right! Fucking A. California votes liberal. See where they are?