'Paedophilia is natural and normal for males'

[ChrisL]

Pedophiles are the worse of the worst of sexual predators. They are trying to become an alternate lifestyle in the eyes of the world. They say they are perfect to teach children about sex. Read up on this shit, and always know where your kids are. I hope you take advantage of the police web sites where you live. Convicted molesters are placed in all kinds of neighborhoods, and you can find out if there are pedophiles and other molesters living close by.
Pedophiles are not victims, they turn children into victims. If there ever comes a time when they can be hunted and killed, I will be in line for a license.

Here in Missouri at least convicted sex offenders are relegated to certian areas as per the "may not live within however far of a school, playground, places where kids congregate' thing. From what I've noticed here in Springfield, that's 2 or 3 apartment complexes. Not familar with them though so assume they're on the "bad side" of town.

Exactly how it SHOULD be. We need to keep predators AWAY from our children.

What I wonder is do the non-offender people moving in get told, "Hey btw, this apartment isn't within (however many) feet of any place with lots of kids, so all the sex offenders move here."

I don't think so. It is up to the pedo to abide by the rules, and thankfully, we parents have access to the sex offender registries so that we can decide whether we want to risk living close to one or not.

 

[ChrisL]

Keeping offenders away is good. Preventing offenders by understanding what's going on with them so as to prevent offending is better.

There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators. IMO, they should be locked away for the rest of their lives. Our children are much too important to the future to put them at risk.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Is evidence convicted child sex offender brains are smaller than the general population. If this turns out to be true and a predictor of the pathology, we might be able to 'nip it in the bud' as it were if we can determine which unborn children show signs of this. Or even prevent it altogether geneticly tweaking whatever genes are responsible.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Keeping offenders away is good. Preventing offenders by understanding what's going on with them so as to prevent offending is better.

There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators. IMO, they should be locked away for the rest of their lives. Our children are much too important to the future to put them at risk.

Good parents accept facts. The facts show that far and away the numebr one threat to young children is the child's own family. Only 3% of child murderers are strangers, rest are someone the kid knows. And in the sex abuse area about two-thirds of offenders are family or close aquaintenances of the family.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Note that saintmike makes a claim that the thread above does not support.

Notice how Leftists are already leaping to the defense of pederasts. Expect more of this in the years to come when queer marriage is old news. NAMBLA will become part of LGBT and will utilize their play book. The Left absolutely will defend pedophilia, no matter what some of them say today. It's the next step in societal de-evolution.

 

[ChrisL]

Keeping offenders away is good. Preventing offenders by understanding what's going on with them so as to prevent offending is better.

There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators. IMO, they should be locked away for the rest of their lives. Our children are much too important to the future to put them at risk.

Good parents accept facts. The facts show that far and away the numebr one threat to young children is the child's own family. Only 3% of child murderers are strangers, rest are someone the kid knows. And in the sex abuse area about two-thirds of offenders are family or close aquaintenances of the family.

What does this have to do with our conversation? That might be true, but what is your point?

 

[ChrisL]

Is evidence convicted child sex offender brains are smaller than the general population. If this turns out to be true and a predictor of the pathology, we might be able to 'nip it in the bud' as it were if we can determine which unborn children show signs of this. Or even prevent it altogether geneticly tweaking whatever genes are responsible.

Yes, well that is interesting, but I don't think it's that the brains are "smaller." It is that they "light up" in different areas than a normal brain on MRI scans, etc.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Keeping offenders away is good. Preventing offenders by understanding what's going on with them so as to prevent offending is better.

There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators. IMO, they should be locked away for the rest of their lives. Our children are much too important to the future to put them at risk.

Good parents accept facts. The facts show that far and away the numebr one threat to young children is the child's own family. Only 3% of child murderers are strangers, rest are someone the kid knows. And in the sex abuse area about two-thirds of offenders are family or close aquaintenances of the family.

What does this have to do with our conversation? That might be true, but what is your point?

"There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators."

Threat isn't from sexual predators. At least, not ones you don't know.

 

[ChrisL]

Keeping offenders away is good. Preventing offenders by understanding what's going on with them so as to prevent offending is better.

There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators. IMO, they should be locked away for the rest of their lives. Our children are much too important to the future to put them at risk.

Good parents accept facts. The facts show that far and away the numebr one threat to young children is the child's own family. Only 3% of child murderers are strangers, rest are someone the kid knows. And in the sex abuse area about two-thirds of offenders are family or close aquaintenances of the family.

What does this have to do with our conversation? That might be true, but what is your point?

"There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators."

Threat isn't from sexual predators. At least, not ones you don't know.

Sure it is. Of course good parents should be vigilant about whom they allow their children to be near. Why would you argue that point? How stupid.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Is evidence convicted child sex offender brains are smaller than the general population. If this turns out to be true and a predictor of the pathology, we might be able to 'nip it in the bud' as it were if we can determine which unborn children show signs of this. Or even prevent it altogether geneticly tweaking whatever genes are responsible.

Yes, well that is interesting, but I don't think it's that the brains are "smaller." It is that they "light up" in different areas than a normal brain on MRI scans, etc.

"Results showed that the brains of sex offenders were relatively smaller in the left hemisphere compared to controls, but there were no significant group differences in optical density. There were no subgroup differences in brain area but the segments corresponding to the left frontal and temporal areas were smaller in sex offenders than controls. There were no significant differences in brain length but sex offenders had smaller widths in both hemispheres than controls. Analysis of symmetry showed that 66.7% of pedophiles and 53.1% of sexual aggressives had asymmetric brains compared to 8.3% of incest offenders and 20.0% of controls. Pedophiles showed smaller left hemispheres than right whereas sexual aggressives were equally split between left and right asymmetry. These results support earlier findings of temporal horn dilatation in pedophiles and sexual aggressives."
Brain density and symmetry in pedophilic and sexually aggressive offenders - Springer

Should take my word for these things, trying find 1 bookmark among hundreds is a chore.

 

[ChrisL]

Keeping offenders away is good. Preventing offenders by understanding what's going on with them so as to prevent offending is better.

There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators. IMO, they should be locked away for the rest of their lives. Our children are much too important to the future to put them at risk.

Good parents accept facts. The facts show that far and away the numebr one threat to young children is the child's own family. Only 3% of child murderers are strangers, rest are someone the kid knows. And in the sex abuse area about two-thirds of offenders are family or close aquaintenances of the family.

What does this have to do with our conversation? That might be true, but what is your point?

"There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators."

Threat isn't from sexual predators. At least, not ones you don't know.

Just WHY are you arguing about this anyways? Any particular reason?

 

[ChrisL]

Is evidence convicted child sex offender brains are smaller than the general population. If this turns out to be true and a predictor of the pathology, we might be able to 'nip it in the bud' as it were if we can determine which unborn children show signs of this. Or even prevent it altogether geneticly tweaking whatever genes are responsible.

Yes, well that is interesting, but I don't think it's that the brains are "smaller." It is that they "light up" in different areas than a normal brain on MRI scans, etc.

"Results showed that the brains of sex offenders were relatively smaller in the left hemisphere compared to controls, but there were no significant group differences in optical density. There were no subgroup differences in brain area but the segments corresponding to the left frontal and temporal areas were smaller in sex offenders than controls. There were no significant differences in brain length but sex offenders had smaller widths in both hemispheres than controls. Analysis of symmetry showed that 66.7% of pedophiles and 53.1% of sexual aggressives had asymmetric brains compared to 8.3% of incest offenders and 20.0% of controls. Pedophiles showed smaller left hemispheres than right whereas sexual aggressives were equally split between left and right asymmetry. These results support earlier findings of temporal horn dilatation in pedophiles and sexual aggressives."
Brain density and symmetry in pedophilic and sexually aggressive offenders - Springer

Should take my word for these things, trying find 1 bookmark among hundreds is a chore.

Why do you have these things bookmarked?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Feeling frustrated someone actually knows what they're talking about?

 

[ChrisL]

Is evidence convicted child sex offender brains are smaller than the general population. If this turns out to be true and a predictor of the pathology, we might be able to 'nip it in the bud' as it were if we can determine which unborn children show signs of this. Or even prevent it altogether geneticly tweaking whatever genes are responsible.

Yes, well that is interesting, but I don't think it's that the brains are "smaller." It is that they "light up" in different areas than a normal brain on MRI scans, etc.

"Results showed that the brains of sex offenders were relatively smaller in the left hemisphere compared to controls, but there were no significant group differences in optical density. There were no subgroup differences in brain area but the segments corresponding to the left frontal and temporal areas were smaller in sex offenders than controls. There were no significant differences in brain length but sex offenders had smaller widths in both hemispheres than controls. Analysis of symmetry showed that 66.7% of pedophiles and 53.1% of sexual aggressives had asymmetric brains compared to 8.3% of incest offenders and 20.0% of controls. Pedophiles showed smaller left hemispheres than right whereas sexual aggressives were equally split between left and right asymmetry. These results support earlier findings of temporal horn dilatation in pedophiles and sexual aggressives."
Brain density and symmetry in pedophilic and sexually aggressive offenders - Springer

Should take my word for these things, trying find 1 bookmark among hundreds is a chore.

Anyways, here is one that agrees with my statements.

Pedophiles Brains Show Abnormal Reaction to Kids Faces

 

[ChrisL]

Feeling frustrated someone actually knows what they're talking about?

I'm wondering why you would have such things bookmarked and why you are arguing with me about this. Answer the questions please.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Sex is an interest. Law is an interest. That the two often overlap shouldn't be surprising given how our society often butts heads against the law in their repressive pursuit of sex.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Didn't doubt the MRI reference, only the part where you said you didn't think they had smaller brains.

Not like I'd know because I hack open pedop brains. Presumedly I had something.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Keeping offenders away is good. Preventing offenders by understanding what's going on with them so as to prevent offending is better.

There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators. IMO, they should be locked away for the rest of their lives. Our children are much too important to the future to put them at risk.

Good parents accept facts. The facts show that far and away the numebr one threat to young children is the child's own family. Only 3% of child murderers are strangers, rest are someone the kid knows. And in the sex abuse area about two-thirds of offenders are family or close aquaintenances of the family.

What does this have to do with our conversation? That might be true, but what is your point?

"There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators."

Threat isn't from sexual predators. At least, not ones you don't know.

Just WHY are you arguing about this anyways? Any particular reason?

Takes two to argue. Without the constant stream of alerts coming in I'd move to other things.

 

[ChrisL]

Sex is an interest. Law is an interest. That the two often overlap shouldn't be surprising given how our society often butts heads against the law in their repressive pursuit of sex.

Regardless of your opinions, children and teens need to be protected from these monsters. Unfortunately not all children or teens have vigilant parents to watch over them and protect them from predatory adults. Therefore, our need for harsh laws and harsh punishments for these sick deviants.

 

[ChrisL]

There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators. IMO, they should be locked away for the rest of their lives. Our children are much too important to the future to put them at risk.

Good parents accept facts. The facts show that far and away the numebr one threat to young children is the child's own family. Only 3% of child murderers are strangers, rest are someone the kid knows. And in the sex abuse area about two-thirds of offenders are family or close aquaintenances of the family.

What does this have to do with our conversation? That might be true, but what is your point?

"There is no "cure" for pedophilia/hebephilia. That is why good parents would be vigilante in protecting their children and teens from such predators."

Threat isn't from sexual predators. At least, not ones you don't know.

Just WHY are you arguing about this anyways? Any particular reason?

Takes two to argue. Without the constant stream of alerts coming in I'd move to other things.

I'm arguing to raise age of consent/marriage to 18. What are you arguing for?