Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 63,309
- 45,985
- 3,565
As I pointed out to Tommy Tainant a one-sided story about something going on in his country is not acceptableEnough of the owner's side is apparent, to anyone that knows anything about construction.
Basically, it was an unsound building to begin with, further damaged by a fire. Even before the fire, bringing it up to modern safety standards would probably have bene cost-prohibitive. After the fire, demolishing it completely seems to me like the only realistic option. It probably was going to need demolishing anyway, sooner or later.
We get enough biased propaganda on topics that do concern us in America without having to deal with his UK bullshit also