Oswald visited USSR and Cuban embassies before killing JFK

[theHawk]

People just can't get over the fact that it was that easy to kill a President.
Many lefties like the conspiracy theory because they can't acknowledge that a lunatic leftist was responsible for the assassination.
All of the physical evidence pointed to Oswald being the shooter from that window. If he was doing it on behalf of the CIA they did a pretty shitty job. Why would they have him go after that General before hand? Why wouldn't they give him a better rifle and scope?

He was a batshit crazy leftist loon, that used his Marine training to murder JFK. And no, hitting a moving target at that distance isn't too difficult for someone that has experience.

Oswald was not lunatic leftist. If he were, he would not have been allowed in the TBD that day....the Secret Service or FBI would have picked him up prior to the event. He was a government agent controlled by the CIA.

It is not easy to kill a president, if the Secret Service does it's job. No president should be in an open car traveling very slowly past tall buildings with windows open...taking slow 90 degree turns...

I am about as far from a Leftist as you can get....Leftists like those in this thread, buy the lies of the State, as do many on the right.

Your proof that he was a CIA agent was that they didn't pick him up? Have you not seen how incompetent government is in tracking criminals in this day and age with everything digital and much easier to track? That era was long before computers and databases could track movements of threats like Oswald. What exactly were they supposed to pick him up for prior to his rampage?


He went after retired General Walker, a known anti-communist, in a botched assassination attempt. Does that sound like a stable CIA agent?
All of the evidence, including the testimony of those that knew him, clearly proved he was a leftist and communist. Does that sound like prime CIA agent material in the 1960's?

You're right, plent of rightwingers like to believe in conspiracy theories too. Mostly because they want to believe the government is the boogeyman.

yeah conspircy theories like 19 muslins were behind the 9/11 attacks.

you dimiss them as boogeyman because pesky facts you cant deal with

you clearly only see what you want to see as we both know because you have played dodgeball with everything gipper has posted you running away form all the facts he has posted here denying reality he has taken you to school.

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thanks for playing.

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

 

[Picaro]

All the above, along with the fact there were dozens of places to have him killed better than Dealy Plaza, which makes no sense at all as a venue of choice. They could have poisoned him and no one would know as another obvious choice. The idea that they would use a loon like Oswald, combined with a venue like Dallas is patently ridiculous. The reason he was shot in Dealy Plaza was because it was convenient for Oswald and nobody else. It was purely opportunistic.

Conspiracy theories are for the mentally weak who cant deal with the randomness and chaos of real life. It makes them feel better to think there is actually somebody in control of everything that happens, like babies who quit crying when given a pacifier.

 

[Pogo]

All the above, along with the fact there were dozens of places to have him killed better than Dealy Plaza, which makes no sense at all as a venue of choice. They could have poisoned him and no one would know as another obvious choice. The idea that they would use a loon like Oswald, combined with a venue like Dallas is patently ridiculous. The reason he was shot in Dealy Plaza was because it was convenient for Oswald and nobody else. It was purely opportunistic.

Conspiracy theories are for the mentally weak who cant deal with the randomness and chaos of real life. It makes them feel better to think there is actually somebody in control of everything that happens, like babies who quit crying when given a pacifier.

Yeah too bad summa the bullets came from the wrong direction and defied the laws of physics and shit. Hey, nothing to see here, move along....

 

[LA RAM FAN]

All the above, along with the fact there were dozens of places to have him killed better than Dealy Plaza, which makes no sense at all as a venue of choice. They could have poisoned him and no one would know as another obvious choice. The idea that they would use a loon like Oswald, combined with a venue like Dallas is patently ridiculous. The reason he was shot in Dealy Plaza was because it was convenient for Oswald and nobody else. It was purely opportunistic.

Conspiracy theories are for the mentally weak who cant deal with the randomness and chaos of real life. It makes them feel better to think there is actually somebody in control of everything that happens, like babies who quit crying when given a pacifier.

like the the conspiracy THEORY of the govenments that oswald was the lone assassin that despite all your desperate pitiful teempts with computer graphics have failed along with the warren commission to prove he did it.



you trolls cant get around pesky facts that not only have you all failed miserably on your faces to prove oswald did it but there were many credible people that saw a gunman behind the picket fence firing a rifle,multiple bullets found on the scene that could not be traced to oswald as seen in photos which were covered ,dallas doctors shoot down your lies,the ballistic evidence did not match up,the zapruder film was altered as many photographic experts have confirmed.

these paid government shills the idiot and rightwinger have doen their job and braninwshed you with their lies cause the truth scares you.

you blatanlty ignores my previous post that proves there was a conspiracy as well idiot.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

All the above, along with the fact there were dozens of places to have him killed better than Dealy Plaza, which makes no sense at all as a venue of choice. They could have poisoned him and no one would know as another obvious choice. The idea that they would use a loon like Oswald, combined with a venue like Dallas is patently ridiculous. The reason he was shot in Dealy Plaza was because it was convenient for Oswald and nobody else. It was purely opportunistic.

Conspiracy theories are for the mentally weak who cant deal with the randomness and chaos of real life. It makes them feel better to think there is actually somebody in control of everything that happens, like babies who quit crying when given a pacifier.

Yeah too bad summa the bullets came from the wrong direction and defied the laws of physics and shit. Hey, nothing to see here, move along....

yeah these trolls cant stand toe to toe in a debate,they ignore how many witnesses who did not go along with the governments version died mysterious deaths and were harrassed if they were lucky enough not get killed.
they also ignore my post how the HSCA investigation concluded there was a second shooter,ignore the testimony of witnesses who saw a gunman behind the picket fence,the multiple bullets seen and photographed in pics which were later removed and covered up proving there were multiple shooters,the ballistic evidence in the tippet shooting did not match oswalds gun,and the stupid facts also ignore the dallas doctors findings as well,

these idiots are the ones that go by THEORIES.the THEORY that oswald did it with a pitiful computer graphic and internet links that cant stand up to facts.

if they would watch this video here they would see the evidence that there were multiple bulltes found at the scene that could not be traced back to oswalds rifle.nobody has ever been able to debunk it.they always refuse to watch it since it proves the CIA was behind it and multiple shooters were involved.



the handlers of the hawk err i mean the idiot and USMBS resident troll rightwinger are obviously getting worried the fact they sent them here to troll.

 

[whitehall]

What does it take to figure it out? The Warren Commission led Americans on a wild goose chase for half a century with junk leaked about the "grassy knoll" and thanks to Hollywood the "grassy knoll" is the story and the iron clad fact that CIA welcomed a traitor and his Russian wife who was the daughter of a KGB agent in the middle of the Cold War is ignored. The Kennedy brothers controlled the CIA and the CIA became a tool of Bobby Kennedy's obsession with Castro. The Kennedy brothers illegally used the CIA as a recruiting and training facility to raise a Hispanic based army to invade a sovereign nation. It may come as a surprise to Kennedy defenders that Castro's Cuba was a sovereign nation but it was and JFK should have been the subject of a media investigation if the media was paying attention. If it wasn't for the slobbering drooling "camelot" idiot liberal media JFK would have been impeached after the Bay of Pigs. It's logical to assume that Lee Oswald was a tool of the CIA and he was recruited to kill Castro. With Oswald's credentials of defecting to Russia and his efforts in disclosing U-2 missions to the Russians and his KGB bride he was a perfect tool to infiltrate Cuba and assassinate Castro. The problem was that the idiots who were in charge of monitoring and directing Oswald's mission lost track of him and he turned up in Texas.

 

[gipper]

Oswald was not lunatic leftist. If he were, he would not have been allowed in the TBD that day....the Secret Service or FBI would have picked him up prior to the event. He was a government agent controlled by the CIA.

It is not easy to kill a president, if the Secret Service does it's job. No president should be in an open car traveling very slowly past tall buildings with windows open...taking slow 90 degree turns...

I am about as far from a Leftist as you can get....Leftists like those in this thread, buy the lies of the State, as do many on the right.

Your proof that he was a CIA agent was that they didn't pick him up? Have you not seen how incompetent government is in tracking criminals in this day and age with everything digital and much easier to track? That era was long before computers and databases could track movements of threats like Oswald. What exactly were they supposed to pick him up for prior to his rampage?


He went after retired General Walker, a known anti-communist, in a botched assassination attempt. Does that sound like a stable CIA agent?
All of the evidence, including the testimony of those that knew him, clearly proved he was a leftist and communist. Does that sound like prime CIA agent material in the 1960's?

You're right, plent of rightwingers like to believe in conspiracy theories too. Mostly because they want to believe the government is the boogeyman.

yeah conspircy theories like 19 muslins were behind the 9/11 attacks.

you dimiss them as boogeyman because pesky facts you cant deal with

you clearly only see what you want to see as we both know because you have played dodgeball with everything gipper has posted you running away form all the facts he has posted here denying reality he has taken you to school.

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thanks for playing.

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

 

[gipper]

What does it take to figure it out? The Warren Commission led Americans on a wild goose chase for half a century with junk leaked about the "grassy knoll" and thanks to Hollywood the "grassy knoll" is the story and the iron clad fact that CIA welcomed a traitor and his Russian wife who was the daughter of a KGB agent in the middle of the Cold War is ignored. The Kennedy brothers controlled the CIA and the CIA became a tool of Bobby Kennedy's obsession with Castro. The Kennedy brothers illegally used the CIA as a recruiting and training facility to raise a Hispanic based army to invade a sovereign nation. It may come as a surprise to Kennedy defenders that Castro's Cuba was a sovereign nation but it was and JFK should have been the subject of a media investigation if the media was paying attention. If it wasn't for the slobbering drooling "camelot" idiot liberal media JFK would have been impeached after the Bay of Pigs. It's logical to assume that Lee Oswald was a tool of the CIA and he was recruited to kill Castro. With Oswald's credentials of defecting to Russia and his efforts in disclosing U-2 missions to the Russians and his KGB bride he was a perfect tool to infiltrate Cuba and assassinate Castro. The problem was that the idiots who were in charge of monitoring and directing Oswald's mission lost track of him and he turned up in Texas.

They never lost track of Oswald. They knew exactly where he was, because they directed him to be where he was.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Your proof that he was a CIA agent was that they didn't pick him up? Have you not seen how incompetent government is in tracking criminals in this day and age with everything digital and much easier to track? That era was long before computers and databases could track movements of threats like Oswald. What exactly were they supposed to pick him up for prior to his rampage?


He went after retired General Walker, a known anti-communist, in a botched assassination attempt. Does that sound like a stable CIA agent?
All of the evidence, including the testimony of those that knew him, clearly proved he was a leftist and communist. Does that sound like prime CIA agent material in the 1960's?

You're right, plent of rightwingers like to believe in conspiracy theories too. Mostly because they want to believe the government is the boogeyman.

yeah conspircy theories like 19 muslins were behind the 9/11 attacks.

you dimiss them as boogeyman because pesky facts you cant deal with

you clearly only see what you want to see as we both know because you have played dodgeball with everything gipper has posted you running away form all the facts he has posted here denying reality he has taken you to school.

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thanks for playing.

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

careful he will put you on ignore like he did with me when he is confronted with pesky little facts that shoot down his fantasys that oswald was a loner and not connected to the CIA.

see this guy i DO advise you to talk to because unlike the paid government hacks USMB's resident troll rightwinger and the hawk-err the idiot and that other stupid fuck,this one is not on the governments payroll like those three are,unlike those three paid trolls he is just a brainwashed idiot who only sees what he wants to see.

post my JFK/Bush connection video and ask him to watch it since he has me on ignore.wont do any good im sure,he'll just put you on ignore as well since he knows he is cornered.

dont expect him to come back and reply,he always runs off everytime you counter his BS.

 

[theHawk]

Your proof that he was a CIA agent was that they didn't pick him up? Have you not seen how incompetent government is in tracking criminals in this day and age with everything digital and much easier to track? That era was long before computers and databases could track movements of threats like Oswald. What exactly were they supposed to pick him up for prior to his rampage?


He went after retired General Walker, a known anti-communist, in a botched assassination attempt. Does that sound like a stable CIA agent?
All of the evidence, including the testimony of those that knew him, clearly proved he was a leftist and communist. Does that sound like prime CIA agent material in the 1960's?

You're right, plent of rightwingers like to believe in conspiracy theories too. Mostly because they want to believe the government is the boogeyman.

yeah conspircy theories like 19 muslins were behind the 9/11 attacks.

you dimiss them as boogeyman because pesky facts you cant deal with

you clearly only see what you want to see as we both know because you have played dodgeball with everything gipper has posted you running away form all the facts he has posted here denying reality he has taken you to school.

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thanks for playing.

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?

yeah conspircy theories like 19 muslins were behind the 9/11 attacks.

you dimiss them as boogeyman because pesky facts you cant deal with

you clearly only see what you want to see as we both know because you have played dodgeball with everything gipper has posted you running away form all the facts he has posted here denying reality he has taken you to school.

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thanks for playing.

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

careful he will put you on ignore like he did with me when he is confronted with pesky little facts that shoot down his fantasys that oswald was a loner and not connected to the CIA.

see this guy i DO advise you to talk to because unlike the paid government hacks USMB's resident troll rightwinger and the hawk-err the idiot and that other stupid fuck,this one is not on the governments payroll like those three are,unlike those three paid trolls he is just a brainwashed idiot who only sees what he wants to see.

post my JFK/Bush connection video and ask him to watch it since he has me on ignore.wont do any good im sure,he'll just put you on ignore as well since he knows he is cornered.

dont expect him to come back and reply,he always runs off everytime you counter his BS.

I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

 

[gipper]

yeah conspircy theories like 19 muslins were behind the 9/11 attacks.

you dimiss them as boogeyman because pesky facts you cant deal with

you clearly only see what you want to see as we both know because you have played dodgeball with everything gipper has posted you running away form all the facts he has posted here denying reality he has taken you to school.

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thanks for playing.

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/traitor,291
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thanks for playing.

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

careful he will put you on ignore like he did with me when he is confronted with pesky little facts that shoot down his fantasys that oswald was a loner and not connected to the CIA.

see this guy i DO advise you to talk to because unlike the paid government hacks USMB's resident troll rightwinger and the hawk-err the idiot and that other stupid fuck,this one is not on the governments payroll like those three are,unlike those three paid trolls he is just a brainwashed idiot who only sees what he wants to see.

post my JFK/Bush connection video and ask him to watch it since he has me on ignore.wont do any good im sure,he'll just put you on ignore as well since he knows he is cornered.

dont expect him to come back and reply,he always runs off everytime you counter his BS.

I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

That is absurd. Do you know anything about Oswald? He was a marine working in intelligence in Japan with the U2. He then defected to the USSR claiming he would give them Intel on all he knew. Do you think for one second if he truly was a traitor, he could waltz back into the USA without a peep? Even the Soviets knew he was a spy.

 

[theHawk]

In other words, you have no evidence.

Thanks for playing.

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/traitor,291
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

careful he will put you on ignore like he did with me when he is confronted with pesky little facts that shoot down his fantasys that oswald was a loner and not connected to the CIA.

see this guy i DO advise you to talk to because unlike the paid government hacks USMB's resident troll rightwinger and the hawk-err the idiot and that other stupid fuck,this one is not on the governments payroll like those three are,unlike those three paid trolls he is just a brainwashed idiot who only sees what he wants to see.

post my JFK/Bush connection video and ask him to watch it since he has me on ignore.wont do any good im sure,he'll just put you on ignore as well since he knows he is cornered.

dont expect him to come back and reply,he always runs off everytime you counter his BS.

I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

That is absurd. Do you know anything about Oswald? He was a marine working in intelligence in Japan with the U2. He then defected to the USSR claiming he would give them Intel on all he knew. Do you think for one second if he truly was a traitor, he could waltz back into the USA without a peep? Even the Soviets knew he was a spy.

He was being "monitored" somewhat by the CIA, because they knew he was a leftist. He visited USSR and Cuban embassies. Should they had picked him up? Yes, in retrospect it's easy to say they should have. But considering he was just one of many pro-commie leftist, and he never did anything too violent. They had no way of knowing he was going to kill the President.

To say that he was an agent, acting on behalf of the CIA is ridiculous. A professional would not be so erratic. He tried to kill a right-wing retired general when his rampage started. He used a shitty rifle and scope, hardly what a pro would use.

 

[gipper]

yeah you have no evidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291&tag=ff0d01-20

hey dipshit even the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation wrote a book on it that it was mob hit moron.

http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/traitor,291
how much do your handlers pay you and rightwinger to troll these boards?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

careful he will put you on ignore like he did with me when he is confronted with pesky little facts that shoot down his fantasys that oswald was a loner and not connected to the CIA.

see this guy i DO advise you to talk to because unlike the paid government hacks USMB's resident troll rightwinger and the hawk-err the idiot and that other stupid fuck,this one is not on the governments payroll like those three are,unlike those three paid trolls he is just a brainwashed idiot who only sees what he wants to see.

post my JFK/Bush connection video and ask him to watch it since he has me on ignore.wont do any good im sure,he'll just put you on ignore as well since he knows he is cornered.

dont expect him to come back and reply,he always runs off everytime you counter his BS.

I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

That is absurd. Do you know anything about Oswald? He was a marine working in intelligence in Japan with the U2. He then defected to the USSR claiming he would give them Intel on all he knew. Do you think for one second if he truly was a traitor, he could waltz back into the USA without a peep? Even the Soviets knew he was a spy.

He was being "monitored" somewhat by the CIA, because they knew he was a leftist. He visited USSR and Cuban embassies. Should they had picked him up? Yes, in retrospect it's easy to say they should have. But considering he was just one of many pro-commie leftist, and he never did anything too violent. They had no way of knowing he was going to kill the President.

To say that he was an agent, acting on behalf of the CIA is ridiculous. A professional would not be so erratic. He tried to kill a right-wing retired general when his rampage started. He used a shitty rifle and scope, hardly what a pro would use.

You are ridiculous. How many American Marines working in Intel, defected to the USSR, essentially admitting treason, were in the USA in 1963???

Ops its just coincidence one happened to be in Dealy Plaza that day...you believe that and you believe anything.

 

[theHawk]

According to that author:

So, what is the prosecution case against Lee Harvey Oswald in the Kennedy assassination?

It’s an easy case. The prosecution case against Oswald is open and shut. If he’d shot his brother-in-law in the back seat of a convertible, and not the President of the United States, he would have been tried, convicted and forgotten in three days. I’m a former federal prosecutor, I’ve been involved in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases for better than 30 years. To be sure, a defense counsel could have raised issues. But the jury would have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. His rifle did it, to the exclusion of all others. He was in the Book Depository with the rifle. He fled the scene. He killed a police officer. His statements to the police are false. His palm print is on the gun.

Was Oswald a nut?

Saying that Oswald is unstable is not the same thing as saying that he was insane. He was not. But to say that he’s unstable is to say that he does not have the kind of personality that includes dependability, loyalty, bonding to others etc., all of which are characteristics of someone who you would want to use in a high-risk venture, and all intelligence work is a high-risk venture.

Lee Harvey Oswald was a loner. He was volatile. He was violent in dealing with his wife and with other people. He had gone through enormous personality changes in his life. Raised an American, he becomes a Marxist; he leaves to go to the Soviet Union. He could not hold a job well, he did not interact with other people, his wife, all of these characteristics indicate that he would not be trustworthy, loyal, honest, all the Boy Scout attributes that government agencies, whether they’re in the Soviet Union or the United States, look for in people in whom they put great trust.

Interview: G. Robert Blakey – Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? - FRONTLINE

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

careful he will put you on ignore like he did with me when he is confronted with pesky little facts that shoot down his fantasys that oswald was a loner and not connected to the CIA.

see this guy i DO advise you to talk to because unlike the paid government hacks USMB's resident troll rightwinger and the hawk-err the idiot and that other stupid fuck,this one is not on the governments payroll like those three are,unlike those three paid trolls he is just a brainwashed idiot who only sees what he wants to see.

post my JFK/Bush connection video and ask him to watch it since he has me on ignore.wont do any good im sure,he'll just put you on ignore as well since he knows he is cornered.

dont expect him to come back and reply,he always runs off everytime you counter his BS.

I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

That is absurd. Do you know anything about Oswald? He was a marine working in intelligence in Japan with the U2. He then defected to the USSR claiming he would give them Intel on all he knew. Do you think for one second if he truly was a traitor, he could waltz back into the USA without a peep? Even the Soviets knew he was a spy.

He was being "monitored" somewhat by the CIA, because they knew he was a leftist. He visited USSR and Cuban embassies. Should they had picked him up? Yes, in retrospect it's easy to say they should have. But considering he was just one of many pro-commie leftist, and he never did anything too violent. They had no way of knowing he was going to kill the President.

To say that he was an agent, acting on behalf of the CIA is ridiculous. A professional would not be so erratic. He tried to kill a right-wing retired general when his rampage started. He used a shitty rifle and scope, hardly what a pro would use.

You are ridiculous. How many American Marines working in Intel, defected to the USSR, essentially admitting treason, were in the USA in 1963???

Ops its just coincidence one happened to be in Dealy Plaza that day...you believe that and you believe anything.

LOL, he was "working in Intel"? Are you fucking kidding me? Lee Harvey Oswald had a 10th grade education when he enlisted in the marines. He was a fucking radar operator, not Intel. He was a shitbag that was court martialed several times and was demoted before getting kicked out. He shot himself playing with a gun he bought. He was a FULL BLOWN RETARD. Hardly someone that would catch the eyes of the CIA for recruitment. He was never a "spy" for anyone. He was an uneducated loser. So please, tell us all again how this fucking retard was a spy for the CIA.

 

[gipper]

Oswald was NOT a loner or volatile. He was a CIA contact.

How in the world can you think he would be allowed back into the USA,during the height of the Cold War, without so much as an interview by the FBI, if he were a Marxist? How can you think a known Marxist would be allowed in the TBD that day? In fact, the CIA took good care of him. He was in contact with several known CIA agents.

Have you ever heard of George Joannides? How about George De Mohrenschildt? You might find George's death most ironic...or maybe not.

I suspect I could name many people involved with the murder, that you have never heard of.

"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary, The Men Who Killed Kennedy: Part 4: The Patsy

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?

careful he will put you on ignore like he did with me when he is confronted with pesky little facts that shoot down his fantasys that oswald was a loner and not connected to the CIA.

see this guy i DO advise you to talk to because unlike the paid government hacks USMB's resident troll rightwinger and the hawk-err the idiot and that other stupid fuck,this one is not on the governments payroll like those three are,unlike those three paid trolls he is just a brainwashed idiot who only sees what he wants to see.

post my JFK/Bush connection video and ask him to watch it since he has me on ignore.wont do any good im sure,he'll just put you on ignore as well since he knows he is cornered.

dont expect him to come back and reply,he always runs off everytime you counter his BS.

I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

That is absurd. Do you know anything about Oswald? He was a marine working in intelligence in Japan with the U2. He then defected to the USSR claiming he would give them Intel on all he knew. Do you think for one second if he truly was a traitor, he could waltz back into the USA without a peep? Even the Soviets knew he was a spy.

He was being "monitored" somewhat by the CIA, because they knew he was a leftist. He visited USSR and Cuban embassies. Should they had picked him up? Yes, in retrospect it's easy to say they should have. But considering he was just one of many pro-commie leftist, and he never did anything too violent. They had no way of knowing he was going to kill the President.

To say that he was an agent, acting on behalf of the CIA is ridiculous. A professional would not be so erratic. He tried to kill a right-wing retired general when his rampage started. He used a shitty rifle and scope, hardly what a pro would use.

You are ridiculous. How many American Marines working in Intel, defected to the USSR, essentially admitting treason, were in the USA in 1963???

Ops its just coincidence one happened to be in Dealy Plaza that day...you believe that and you believe anything.

LOL, he was "working in Intel"? Are you fucking kidding me? Lee Harvey Oswald had a 10th grade education when he enlisted in the marines. He was a fucking radar operator, not Intel. He was a shitbag that was court martialed several times and was demoted before getting kicked out. He shot himself playing with a gun he bought. He was a FULL BLOWN RETARD. Hardly someone that would catch the eyes of the CIA for recruitment. He was never a "spy" for anyone. He was an uneducated loser. So please, tell us all again how this fucking retard was a spy for the CIA.

So you apparently do not know that Oswald knew many CIA agents, even though that has been widely reported and documented.

You continue to ignore the facts. Why?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?
I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

That is absurd. Do you know anything about Oswald? He was a marine working in intelligence in Japan with the U2. He then defected to the USSR claiming he would give them Intel on all he knew. Do you think for one second if he truly was a traitor, he could waltz back into the USA without a peep? Even the Soviets knew he was a spy.

He was being "monitored" somewhat by the CIA, because they knew he was a leftist. He visited USSR and Cuban embassies. Should they had picked him up? Yes, in retrospect it's easy to say they should have. But considering he was just one of many pro-commie leftist, and he never did anything too violent. They had no way of knowing he was going to kill the President.

To say that he was an agent, acting on behalf of the CIA is ridiculous. A professional would not be so erratic. He tried to kill a right-wing retired general when his rampage started. He used a shitty rifle and scope, hardly what a pro would use.

You are ridiculous. How many American Marines working in Intel, defected to the USSR, essentially admitting treason, were in the USA in 1963???

Ops its just coincidence one happened to be in Dealy Plaza that day...you believe that and you believe anything.

LOL, he was "working in Intel"? Are you fucking kidding me? Lee Harvey Oswald had a 10th grade education when he enlisted in the marines. He was a fucking radar operator, not Intel. He was a shitbag that was court martialed several times and was demoted before getting kicked out. He shot himself playing with a gun he bought. He was a FULL BLOWN RETARD. Hardly someone that would catch the eyes of the CIA for recruitment. He was never a "spy" for anyone. He was an uneducated loser. So please, tell us all again how this fucking retard was a spy for the CIA.

So you apparently do not know that Oswald knew many CIA agents, even though that has been widely reported and documented.

You continue to ignore the facts. Why?

man I give up.How many times have i told you not to feed the trolls?

the REASON he ignores facts is just like USMB'S resident troll rightwinger,he is on the governments payroll and has been sent here by his handlers to troll this thread and evade facts the whole time being instructed by them not to watch my JFK/BUSH CONNECTION video since it has way too many pesky facts in it of proof of multiple shooters.

This disinfo agent "the idiot" knows perfectly well just as well as the other government paid hack USMB's resident troll rightwinger, that the CIA was behind it.they have been sent here by their handlers to try and derail this thread.

thats WHY they consistantly evade facts all the time and ignore them all the time and refuse to watch videos like my JFK/BUSH connection video because thats what their handlers instruct them to do.

they wont watch that video of mine since it shows the actual photos taken of the scene of the crime that day prove there were multiple shooters involved like the bullet hole in the windshield that two police officers saw BEFORE THE WINDSHIELD EVIDENCE WAS DESTROYED LIKE ALL THE OTHER EVIDENCE IN THE CASE,that before it was destroyed,two police officers that examined it said it was a bullet hole entrance shot.

plus this stupid fuck ignores how so many witnesses died mysterious deaths when they did not go along with the official version as well as ignoring how three police officers "one who owned a rifle shop and knew all about rifles what they looked like no less" this stupid fuck also ignores that they all said the rifle was a mauser.the one officer who did not recant his story roger craig survived many attempts on his life after that by people to kill him since he would not change his story like the other two,then finally his luck eventually ran out on him.

this stupid fuck keeps running off with his tail between his legs dodging all these facts ignoring them since they prove what a stupid fuck he is.

so since he ignores everything,i have done the same thing with him that i did with USMB's resident troll, the other disinfo agent,rightwinger .add him to ignore. they ignore everything we post so best to return the favor and ignore them as well-

 

[LA RAM FAN]

as i said before,go ahead and try and reason with brain dead whitehall.HE is not a government paid hack sent here to troll by his handlers like rightwinger and the idiot.He is just a regular joe who is in denial and only sees what he wants to see so him i DO encourage you to talk to.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?
I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

That is absurd. Do you know anything about Oswald? He was a marine working in intelligence in Japan with the U2. He then defected to the USSR claiming he would give them Intel on all he knew. Do you think for one second if he truly was a traitor, he could waltz back into the USA without a peep? Even the Soviets knew he was a spy.

He was being "monitored" somewhat by the CIA, because they knew he was a leftist. He visited USSR and Cuban embassies. Should they had picked him up? Yes, in retrospect it's easy to say they should have. But considering he was just one of many pro-commie leftist, and he never did anything too violent. They had no way of knowing he was going to kill the President.

To say that he was an agent, acting on behalf of the CIA is ridiculous. A professional would not be so erratic. He tried to kill a right-wing retired general when his rampage started. He used a shitty rifle and scope, hardly what a pro would use.

You are ridiculous. How many American Marines working in Intel, defected to the USSR, essentially admitting treason, were in the USA in 1963???

Ops its just coincidence one happened to be in Dealy Plaza that day...you believe that and you believe anything.

LOL, he was "working in Intel"? Are you fucking kidding me? Lee Harvey Oswald had a 10th grade education when he enlisted in the marines. He was a fucking radar operator, not Intel. He was a shitbag that was court martialed several times and was demoted before getting kicked out. He shot himself playing with a gun he bought. He was a FULL BLOWN RETARD. Hardly someone that would catch the eyes of the CIA for recruitment. He was never a "spy" for anyone. He was an uneducated loser. So please, tell us all again how this fucking retard was a spy for the CIA.

So you apparently do not know that Oswald knew many CIA agents, even though that has been widely reported and documented.

You continue to ignore the facts. Why?

Indeed this stupid fuck THE IDIOT constantly ignores pesky facts that dont support his lies of the warren commission.

He probably will say that the CIA agents that have come out and said they knew Oswald all these years were all lying just for attention or that they never said that of course.

No telling what the handlers of this stupid shit are telling him to post here.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Why would the CIA kill JFK? Give me one good reason.

Kennedy was thinking of getting out of Vietnam?

That work?

No. Kennedy not only green lighted the Diem assassination in October '63, he increased U.S. presence there right up to two or three weeks before he was assassinated. He wouldn't have bothered with Diem if he intended to get out. The Kennedy family's PR machine began peddling that later on; it's just revisionism, as is the vast majority of the Camelot Myth. the fantasy that the CIA read one of his diary entries and plotted out an elaborate assassination schemes like the loons and cranks insist happened id prima facie ridiculous nonsense, even if they wanted to.

JFK was notoriously wishy washy and his diary entries mean nothing. His main concern with Diem is him and his brother were attempting to negotiate a unilateral peace deal with Ho, and Kennedy was afraid of how that would effect his rep as a McCarthyite 'anti-communist' in his upcoming re-election campaign is the far more likely reality as to why he had Diem done away with. No way JFK would have pulled out of VN, at least not until the end of his second term, anyway.

Not true.

Withdrawal from Vietnam (Oct. 11, 1963). JFK signs NSAM 263, an order to withdraw 1,000 troops out of roughly 16,000 Americans stationed in Vietnam by the end of 1963, with the complete withdrawal by the end of 1965.

Escalation in Vietnam (Nov. 26, 1963): Signed by President Lyndon Johnson four days after JFK’s death, NSAM 273 succeeded NSAM 263 and ordered the planning of increased activity in Vietnam.

JFK’s American University “Peace” Speech:


I will agree he was wishy washy at times when speaking with the press. Many have concluded that this was to appease the war hawks in the Pentagon and CIA.

the other thing these stupid fuck shills cant get around that backs this post of yours up that he was going to get us out of vietnam is his two closest aides and his friend senator Mansfield all said he told them he was going to withdraw all military personal out of vietnam by the end of 1965 telling them he could not do it in his first term but could do it after he was reelected telling them he might go down in history as the most unpopular president ever but that he wasnt going to commit them to war.

the facts back that statement up as well.In the interview he gave with walter kronkite in sept of 63 two months before the assassination,you see them post the figure on the tv screen that says 82 casultys.a far cry from the 58,000 americans killed in action under Johnson and Nixon yet these idiots say Kennedy expanded the war,

More importantly though than anything else the MAIN thing that backs up your post here that he was going to pull out of vietnam is Flectcher Prouty in a documentary that he made with John Judge talks about how it was no secret back then that everyone in the military knew he was going to pull of of vietnam by 1965 because there were headlines in the pentagons stars and stripes newspaper that read KENNEDY TO WITHDRAW FROM VIETNAM BY 1965.

Robert Groden in one of his books also backs up Prouty showing a reprint of that newspaper taken from back then with those headlines..

these paid shills rightwinger and THE IDIOT can only slong shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are and them and their handlers are pissed that they cant get us to listen to them with their propaganda bullshit and lies.

 

[theHawk]

There were many commie sympathizers, and the FBI couldn't keep very good tabs on them. Even if they did keep track of them, they still couldn't arrest them or really do anything to stop their activities.

So again I ask, what exactly was the FBI supposed to do with him after his return?
I am waiting for you to respond. You ran away after I used your own source to debunk your load of crap.

So if either one of you can step up....

That is absurd. Do you know anything about Oswald? He was a marine working in intelligence in Japan with the U2. He then defected to the USSR claiming he would give them Intel on all he knew. Do you think for one second if he truly was a traitor, he could waltz back into the USA without a peep? Even the Soviets knew he was a spy.

He was being "monitored" somewhat by the CIA, because they knew he was a leftist. He visited USSR and Cuban embassies. Should they had picked him up? Yes, in retrospect it's easy to say they should have. But considering he was just one of many pro-commie leftist, and he never did anything too violent. They had no way of knowing he was going to kill the President.

To say that he was an agent, acting on behalf of the CIA is ridiculous. A professional would not be so erratic. He tried to kill a right-wing retired general when his rampage started. He used a shitty rifle and scope, hardly what a pro would use.

You are ridiculous. How many American Marines working in Intel, defected to the USSR, essentially admitting treason, were in the USA in 1963???

Ops its just coincidence one happened to be in Dealy Plaza that day...you believe that and you believe anything.

LOL, he was "working in Intel"? Are you fucking kidding me? Lee Harvey Oswald had a 10th grade education when he enlisted in the marines. He was a fucking radar operator, not Intel. He was a shitbag that was court martialed several times and was demoted before getting kicked out. He shot himself playing with a gun he bought. He was a FULL BLOWN RETARD. Hardly someone that would catch the eyes of the CIA for recruitment. He was never a "spy" for anyone. He was an uneducated loser. So please, tell us all again how this fucking retard was a spy for the CIA.

So you apparently do not know that Oswald knew many CIA agents, even though that has been widely reported and documented.

You continue to ignore the facts. Why?

I'm the one ignoring the facts? You can't even acknowledge that Oswald was a complete dimwit, discharged from service in disgrace, and was never in "Intel" like you said before. The fact that you think a radar operator is apart of the Intel field in the military shows that you don't know what you are talking about.

I'm still waiting to hear how a 24 year old with a 10th grade education and a record of insubordination, violence, and pro-communist got him earmarked for recruitment by the CIA in the early 60's. By all means, show me these "facts" you have.