Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Since the entire NY Times story was blown to hell, exposed as nothing more than a smear / false narrative, it is safe to say there is no way in hell the Senate would go along with this continued Democrat / Liberal Extremist 'tantrum' over losing in 2016.Let them go forward, if the House impeaches, I doubt the Senate will convict.
Several posters here claim that they are paid by the Democrats to post DNC propaganda. Apparently, some think it is fun to beat up on President Trump, his appointees and family.the message board protects the creepy insane in here, those kids are forever damaged. and these fkwads in here are all culpable"Not recollecting is not contradictory evidence."
Yes it is. No victim, no crime.
But there are victims. Kavanaugh's children.
that so rightly got Russia russia right on, correct? these folks are fkwads, each and everyone of them. They are the lowest life form beetles have a better hygiene.what would be over? what did they miss? you're very confused, your TDS is obscuring your intelligence at the moment.If your fuckedc up cheating rapist protecting party had a real investigation, it would be over.Except such does not delegitimize any rulings whatsoever.Liberals are continuing to go after Kavanaugh to delegitimize future SCOTUS rulings that don't go their way.
The entire smear campaign is utterly asinine.
Interesting how democrats are quick to trash the "fine men and women of the FBI".
Y'know, I watch both parties spike the ball over this stuff - the Dems when the accusations come out, the GOP when the accusations fall flat. I can't blame the GOP when they cram it back in the Dems' face.
But minor problem here: Now, virtually any accusation will be tainted if it doesn't have solid evidence.
Whenever there are X number of left wing women all of a sudden lining up on call with clearly bogus bullshit like
He assaulted me, I just can't remember when or where
We should respond this way
Shutterstock
Or we could just go back to the old reliable system - the one where we do not try and ruin people over allegations without proof and we do not judge those making the allegations.Y'know, I watch both parties spike the ball over this stuff - the Dems when the accusations come out, the GOP when the accusations fall flat. I can't blame the GOP when they cram it back in the Dems' face.
But minor problem here: Now, virtually any accusation will be tainted if it doesn't have solid evidence. The accuser will be a target, because now we have to consider the possible nefarious motives of the woman.
I don't know about you, but I don't like where this is going.
.
I wasn’t aware of that.yes it was.But it wasn’t uncovered during the Ford fiascoThis is why most Americans will crawl naked over broken glass next November to vote for the guy we really don’t want as President.
They completely fabricated the entire story.
It’s all about smear.
View attachment 279531
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ts_outrageous_smear_of_justice_kavanaugh.html
Because the reporters on this are releasing a book about Kavanauh's years in Yale.I wasn’t aware of that.yes it was.But it wasn’t uncovered during the Ford fiascoThis is why most Americans will crawl naked over broken glass next November to vote for the guy we really don’t want as President.
They completely fabricated the entire story.
It’s all about smear.
View attachment 279531
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ts_outrageous_smear_of_justice_kavanaugh.html
So, I’m confused...why is it being revisited?
Please and thank you