NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change - Yahoo Voices - voices.yahoo.com
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change - Yahoo Voices - voices.yahoo.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
See what happens when they have to provide links? They give links to every place except where they said they got the info or a link to the place that doesnt have the info they claim.
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change - Yahoo Voices - voices.yahoo.com
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change - Yahoo Voices - voices.yahoo.com
Oh, so NASA is an opinion we should trust on Global climate change?
Jeebus, you're one dumb fuckin' troll, fella. Here you go, I'll serve it right up for you.
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change - Yahoo Voices - voices.yahoo.com
Oh, so NASA is an opinion we should trust on Global climate change?
Are you saying that we should not trust NASA on AGW?
Oh, so NASA is an opinion we should trust on Global climate change?
Are you saying that we should not trust NASA on AGW?
Not at all. I'm just asking if you think NASA's opinion should be trusted when it comes to AGW.
I trust NASA's opinion, do you?
No, i do not. Here, let me help you little minded turds out since search engines are too much for you:
Can We Trust the U.N.'s IPCC Climate Models? - Reason.com
World's top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER what we thought - and computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong | Mail Online
Top climate scientists admit global warming forecasts were wrong - Telegraph
The UN IPCC's Climate Modeling Procedures Need Serious Remodeling - Forbes
IPCC Admits they Could be Wrong about Humans Causing Global Warming « Roy Spencer, PhD
IPCC Railroad engineer Pachauri acknowledges ?No warming for 17 years? | Watts Up With That?
97% of climate models say that 97% of climate scientists are wrong | CACA
I hop eyou can find one you like. If you can read (I'm skeptical) they even include hyperlinks for further reading!
You're welcome!
I thought you said the IPCC admitted to being incorrect. How come none of your "proof" actually links to the IPCC? Odd.
That's ok though...you linked us to WhatsupWithThat.com and a WordPress blog.
Are you saying that we should not trust NASA on AGW?
Not at all. I'm just asking if you think NASA's opinion should be trusted when it comes to AGW.
I trust NASA's opinion, do you?
Since you trust them, then I guess they are telling you the models are wrong and you should now apologize to everyone for all your comments to the contrary.
In other words you are wrong! Will you own up to since you claim you trust NASA?
Nearly half of meteorologists reject man-made global warming | The Daily Caller
Interesting link counter to the "97%" argument regarding scientific consensus:
"The survey of AMS members found that while 52 percent of American Meteorological Society members believe climate change is occurring and mostly human-induced, 48 percent of members do not believe in man-made global warming.
Furthermore, the survey found that scientists who professed liberal political views were much more likely to believe in the theory of man-made global warming than those who without liberal views."
Hardly the "consensus" liberals claim.
Not at all. I'm just asking if you think NASA's opinion should be trusted when it comes to AGW.
I trust NASA's opinion, do you?
Since you trust them, then I guess they are telling you the models are wrong and you should now apologize to everyone for all your comments to the contrary.
In other words you are wrong! Will you own up to since you claim you trust NASA?
I do trust them, hence why I take their word when they say that their is a consensus and that global warming is real...
Climate Change: Consensus - NASA
and it's major reason why is due to man.
Climate Change: Causes - NASA
Glad we both agree that NASA is to be trusted on this topic.
Is this where you start your back pedaling?
Since you trust them, then I guess they are telling you the models are wrong and you should now apologize to everyone for all your comments to the contrary.
In other words you are wrong! Will you own up to since you claim you trust NASA?
I do trust them, hence why I take their word when they say that their is a consensus and that global warming is real...
Climate Change: Consensus - NASA
and it's major reason why is due to man.
Climate Change: Causes - NASA
Glad we both agree that NASA is to be trusted on this topic.
Is this where you start your back pedaling?
As usual the far left AGW church going Obama drone can not admit to being wrong and claims to trust NASA but clearly does not.
And further proof that AGW church members do not have a clue on the subject beyond what they are programmed to think.
Not at all. I'm just asking if you think NASA's opinion should be trusted when it comes to AGW.
I trust NASA's opinion, do you?
Since you trust them, then I guess they are telling you the models are wrong and you should now apologize to everyone for all your comments to the contrary.
In other words you are wrong! Will you own up to since you claim you trust NASA?
I do trust them, hence why I take their word when they say that their is a consensus and that global warming is real...
Climate Change: Consensus - NASA
and it's major reason why is due to man.
Climate Change: Causes - NASA
Glad we both agree that NASA is to be trusted on this topic.
Is this where you start your back pedaling?
Since you trust them, then I guess they are telling you the models are wrong and you should now apologize to everyone for all your comments to the contrary.
In other words you are wrong! Will you own up to since you claim you trust NASA?
I do trust them, hence why I take their word when they say that their is a consensus and that global warming is real...
Climate Change: Consensus - NASA
and it's major reason why is due to man.
Climate Change: Causes - NASA
Glad we both agree that NASA is to be trusted on this topic.
Is this where you start your back pedaling?
I love hoe ignorant and yet so sure posters are on this topic. Is there anything to notice about the NASA climate change causes link? Like, perhaps that ALL of the data being used to make conclusions is out of date? Gee, you'd think they would update to modern data, but why do that? I mean, we can keep old data up and make false claims based on it, right?
You simply do not understand the topic at hand, or the fact that data sets change and are challenged regularly. As it currently stands, 97% of all models have been wrong against observation. The IPCC has members that admit so, and I linked you to it.
But you scoff because your belief system will not let you question the validity of whether or not Climate Jesus exists and to what degree.
I linked you to SEVERAL sources so that your source bias bullshit could be avoided. And yet you STILL tried it. There are several links there, Poindexter. The information is there, if only you would learn to read and allow cognition instead of cognition failure over your Clmiate Jesus. Anyway, I'm bored of the topic.
The OP is nonsense and meaningless. The rest is the typical LOLberal moronic attempts to understand something they do not to defend (what i will call from now on) Climate Jesus.
I do trust them, hence why I take their word when they say that their is a consensus and that global warming is real...
Climate Change: Consensus - NASA
and it's major reason why is due to man.
Climate Change: Causes - NASA
Glad we both agree that NASA is to be trusted on this topic.
Is this where you start your back pedaling?
As usual the far left AGW church going Obama drone can not admit to being wrong and claims to trust NASA but clearly does not.
And further proof that AGW church members do not have a clue on the subject beyond what they are programmed to think.
So you trust NASA or not?
This is where you avoid answering the question and expose yourself for the hypocrite you are.
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change
NASA Says Computer Models Wrong About Climate Change - Yahoo Voices - voices.yahoo.com
Oh, so NASA is an opinion we should trust on Global climate change?
Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy, Dullard.
Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy. using the science available, the AGW crowd is the one who has been swinging and missing. The models are wrong. Projections are wrong. And there is plenty of serious question remaining about climate change. Even the IPCC admits they were wrong on the models.
I dont give a fuck how many flat earth people you can crowd into a room. Appeal to authority and consensus do not give a scientific theory merit.
As usual the far left AGW church going Obama drone can not admit to being wrong and claims to trust NASA but clearly does not.
And further proof that AGW church members do not have a clue on the subject beyond what they are programmed to think.
So you trust NASA or not?
This is where you avoid answering the question and expose yourself for the hypocrite you are.
As predicted Kosh bails on answering this question and the thread.
You people have literally ZERO integrity. None.