PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
I couldn't have said it better!
That goes with out saying, westy. However, the article totally misrepresents the issue at hand. If anyone is ensuring that in the future that humans will live like animals, it's the deniers. You seem to working hard to make sure that, And further, the more affluent humankind becomes, the more it demand clean soil, clean air, clean water, aesthetic beauty and conservation of other living things which it has capacity to appreciate as no other species can, never happens. You are attempting to block that very impulse at every turn!
It does and is happening. Despite the environmentalist religionists mostly indefensible docvtrines, those of us who are AGW skeptics and who advocate the blessings of liberty over environmental facism. . . .
those of us who are blessed the basic necessities of life and a reasonable quality of life. . . .
We actually want and demand clean soil, clean air, clean water, and aesthetic beauty.
We were demanding it four decades ago when the scientific community was certain we were destroying the ozone layer around the Earth.
We were demanding it a short three decades ago when the scientific community was concenred that we were heading into unacceptable global cooling if not a new ice age.
We were demanding it after the politico scientific community found prestige, power, and profit in advocating anthropogenic global warming.
And we were demanding it in between when the politico scientific community was focusing on some real issues such as heavy metals dumped into our oceans and needless destruction of rain forests.
And now that the AGW 'scare' is finally being appropriately debunked and funding will increasingly be drying up for that, you can be sure the politico scientific community is looking for the next big THREAT to study and write about so they can keep all that lovely funding coming in to fund their lifestyle that in no way suggests that they are in any way worried about the environment or the climate.
Just one example: Al Gore's new mega million dollar, not particularly environmentally friendly, California estate. What do you suppose the carbon footprint is for this in addition to his 10,000 sq ft mansion in Tennessee that utilizes more fossil fuels in a month than any 10 normal families together utilize in a year. Does that look like somebody who is really REALLY worried about climate change?
Quite a crib, eh...
According to this, it is a 'seaside mansion..'
The L.A. Times is reporting the massive, seaside mansion complete with NINE bathrooms has been added to the Gores real estate holdings and they only had to fork over $8,875,000 for the Italian-style ocean-view villa, complete with a swimming pool, spa and fountains. Al Gore, Tipper Gore snap up Montecito-area villa - Los Angeles Times
But but but if it is seaside, and Vice President Gore assured us that the oceans would rise some 20 feet or so...
doesn't that mean that that brave man is putting his life in jeopardy????
Intervention...immediatel!