saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
Never defend the indefensible, even by pointing out other indefensible acts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Perhaps -- but they didn't bring them here.If it weren't for Muslims. They were running the international slave trade for centuries before America even existed.If it weren't for white men, there would be virtually no Blacks in the US.
If true, then yes.Nope. Northerners did. Every slave ship was built and operated out of New York and Boston harbors. It kinda deflates the sails of the "slavery was a sin of the south" narrative, doesn't it?Perhaps -- but they didn't bring them here.If it weren't for Muslims. They were running the international slave trade for centuries before America even existed.If it weren't for white men, there would be virtually no Blacks in the US.
In the "recent" history of slavery, well past the renaissance, blacks African were the slaves to most of the world. The world-wide perception was that they were essentially sub-human. While popular mores have changed, that perception still exists.
The ancient Egyptians enslaved blacks at least 3000 years earlier.Black Africans had been slaves for a very, very long time before American history began.In the "recent" history of slavery, well past the renaissance, blacks African were the slaves to most of the world. The world-wide perception was that they were essentially sub-human. While popular mores have changed, that perception still exists.
According to the unsophisticated Left, slavery started in America and ended because of Lincoln. They have no clue what I'm talking about when I mention the Muslims running the trade out of Morocco since the 16th century. It didn't begin for them until Americans did it.
The ancient Egyptians enslaved blacks at least 3000 years earlier.Black Africans had been slaves for a very, very long time before American history began.In the "recent" history of slavery, well past the renaissance, blacks African were the slaves to most of the world. The world-wide perception was that they were essentially sub-human. While popular mores have changed, that perception still exists.
According to the unsophisticated Left, slavery started in America and ended because of Lincoln. They have no clue what I'm talking about when I mention the Muslims running the trade out of Morocco since the 16th century. It didn't begin for them until Americans did it.
So it's your contention that Leopold was lied on and the atrocities are lies??There is no excuse for enslaving anyone. None.
Excuse for what? Communism?
Nope, it's not an excuse for communism. It's a sneer at the thought that white people are to blame for progressive blood baths.
Where did you get that?
And "Leopold was lied on"...what does that even mean? Try again in English. Wait, don't bother. You're too stupid to talk to me. Please stop.
I understand that it's the day after thanksgiving and you may still be drunk after the number of sperm cocktails you have ingested, so allow me to help you.
Offline
koshergrl Gold Member
Joined:
Aug 4, 2011
Messages:
41,796
Thanks Received:
5,464
Trophy Points:
260
Ratings:
+6,271
Toro said: ↑
Thank you King Leopold II of Belgium, white man, for killing 10,000,000 people in the Congo, enslaving many more, and hacking the limbs off anyone who wouldn't work for you extracting rubber so you could get rich.
Oh give me a break. They're still doing that in the Sudan.
So you were called out concerning your defense of Leopold's slaughter of people. No worries, take a day off of the cock tails and your mental acuity may improve.
If it weren't for white men, there would be virtually no Blacks in the US.
If it weren't for Muslims. They were running the international slave trade for centuries before America even existed.
So it's your contention that Leopold was lied on and the atrocities are lies??There is no excuse for enslaving anyone. None.
Excuse for what? Communism?
Nope, it's not an excuse for communism. It's a sneer at the thought that white people are to blame for progressive blood baths.
Where did you get that?
And "Leopold was lied on"...what does that even mean? Try again in English. Wait, don't bother. You're too stupid to talk to me. Please stop.
I understand that it's the day after thanksgiving and you may still be drunk after the number of sperm cocktails you have ingested, so allow me to help you.
Offline
koshergrl Gold Member
Joined:
Aug 4, 2011
Messages:
41,796
Thanks Received:
5,464
Trophy Points:
260
Ratings:
+6,271
Toro said: ↑
Thank you King Leopold II of Belgium, white man, for killing 10,000,000 people in the Congo, enslaving many more, and hacking the limbs off anyone who wouldn't work for you extracting rubber so you could get rich.
Oh give me a break. They're still doing that in the Sudan.
So you were called out concerning your defense of Leopold's slaughter of people. No worries, take a day off of the cock tails and your mental acuity may improve.
How ridiculous. I never defended anything.
Are you mentally ill? Mentally ill people spout gibberish and then descend into weird explicit sexual descriptions as well...
Not as well traveled as the Europeans. Asians relative to Asians migrated and built empires, but which were dwarfed by European travels and their empires. The Russians easily subdued the Kamchadal people, for example, and colonized Siberia, doing likewise in Alaska with the Kodiak, Aleut, and the bands of peoples southward into California.link shit stain? 1776Whites had the balls and IQ to sail across the ocean to create this country. That fact is covered up by the liberal scum in this country constantly trying to blame the mistakes/problems of non-whites on whites.
Asians/Polynesians were well traveled too mate
Not as well traveled as the Europeans. Asians relative to Asians migrated and built empires, but which were dwarfed by European travels and their empires. The Russians easily subdued the Kamchadal people, for example, and colonized Siberia, doing likewise in Alaska with the Kodiak, Aleut, and the bands of peoples southward into California.link shit stain? 1776Whites had the balls and IQ to sail across the ocean to create this country. That fact is covered up by the liberal scum in this country constantly trying to blame the mistakes/problems of non-whites on whites.
Asians/Polynesians were well traveled too mate
Some especially daring Polynesians shoved off the Tahitian coast to continue their explorations to the north and east. They found Hawai'i. Without such dumb luck, they would have perished. Impressive? Sure, okay, but still, it pales in comparison to the depth and scope of European exploration.
Indeed. Compare Africans' failure to discover Cape Verde, Madagascar and the Canary Islands mere miles off to African coast.Not as well traveled as the Europeans. Asians relative to Asians migrated and built empires, but which were dwarfed by European travels and their empires. The Russians easily subdued the Kamchadal people, for example, and colonized Siberia, doing likewise in Alaska with the Kodiak, Aleut, and the bands of peoples southward into California.link shit stain? 1776Whites had the balls and IQ to sail across the ocean to create this country. That fact is covered up by the liberal scum in this country constantly trying to blame the mistakes/problems of non-whites on whites.
Asians/Polynesians were well traveled too mate
Some especially daring Polynesians shoved off the Tahitian coast to continue their explorations to the north and east. They found Hawai'i. Without such dumb luck, they would have perished. Impressive? Sure, okay, but still, it pales in comparison to the depth and scope of European exploration.
Indeed. Compare Africans' failure to discover Cape Verde, Madagascar and the Canary Islands mere miles off to African coast.Not as well traveled as the Europeans. Asians relative to Asians migrated and built empires, but which were dwarfed by European travels and their empires. The Russians easily subdued the Kamchadal people, for example, and colonized Siberia, doing likewise in Alaska with the Kodiak, Aleut, and the bands of peoples southward into California.link shit stain? 1776Whites had the balls and IQ to sail across the ocean to create this country. That fact is covered up by the liberal scum in this country constantly trying to blame the mistakes/problems of non-whites on whites.
Asians/Polynesians were well traveled too mate
Some especially daring Polynesians shoved off the Tahitian coast to continue their explorations to the north and east. They found Hawai'i. Without such dumb luck, they would have perished. Impressive? Sure, okay, but still, it pales in comparison to the depth and scope of European exploration.
[]Indeed. Compare Africans' failure to discover Cape Verde, Madagascar and the Canary Islands mere miles off to African coast.
So, do Republicans care about anyone that isn't a white male?
In the "recent" history of slavery, well past the renaissance, blacks African were the slaves to most of the world. The world-wide perception was that they were essentially sub-human. While popular mores have changed, that perception still exists.
According to the unsophisticated Left, slavery started in America and ended because of Lincoln. They have no clue what I'm talking about when I mention the Muslims running the trade out of Morocco since the 16th century. It didn't begin for them until Americans did it.