OK Scientists. Explain How Global Warming Is Causing Snowy/Blizzard Conditions In Northern States.

[SassyIrishLass]

Well, so what is Happening in South Dakota, Iowa, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan and Indiana today is a result of Global Warming? Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow and our children living on the coastlines would be dealing with flooding all the time being the north pole has melted?
It's only November 22, but it looks more like a typical January in the rust belt. Well, there u go. Lets hear your "Global Warming Explanations"

It's simple. Climate change means the weather changes...in the winter, it snows.....and then....we all know what happens....and the weatherman usually is wrong.

And when their predictions don't come to pass...climate change aka globull warming "paused". How cooooonnnnvvvvviiiiieeeennnnttttt!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow

Of course not. See, there's your problem. You're just brainlessly parroting the fabricated stories that your masters told you to repeat.

Now, people of normal intelligence understand that snow in late November is common in the northern USA, and thus they laugh at anyone bleating the standard "Look! A snowflake! Global warming is a hoax!" denier cult mantra.

"Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” Dr. David Viner, a scientist with the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia, told the UK Independent in 2000.

East Angelia? Remember them? Hiding the decline Mann's Nature trick

Good times
--------------------------------------------------------
American scientist Wieslaw Maslowsk in 2007, who said that “you can argue that may be our projection of [an ice-free Arctic by 2013] is already too conservative.”

Yes, wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too conservative

------------------------------------------------------------------

“Warmer, earlier springs are a clear signal of a changing climate,” the group said. “March temperatures have grown 2.1 degrees (F) hotter, on average, in the United States since reliable record-keeping began in 1880s. Similarly, the first leaves have started appearing on plants several days earlier than they used to across the country.” Union of Concerned Scientists

ZOMG!!!

OMFG!!!!

Mamooth!!

A couple of twits at an obscure college in East Anglia mean NOTHING, despite Rush repeating a million times that it proves facts to be a hoax, hater dupes.

They were the premier "research" facility, I mean before they got caught fudging the data

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Does anyone find it a bit suspicious that their plan to combat global warming is to raise taxes...yeah we get it.

link? lol

To what, your brain? Have you misplaced it again?

He thought LSD was a breakfast cereal

 

[Rustic]

 

[mamooth]

When I point out denialism is only a conspiracy cult, deniers should at least try to refrain from proving it by spewing more conspiracy babbling.

But then, deniers are now only preaching to the choir. Denier conspiracy ranting is like a crowd of Islamicists screaming "Allahu Ahkbar!". The point of it isn't to convert the infidels. The point of it is to whip up some mob enthusiasm, and to demonstrate to the other cultists what a loyal cultist you are yourself.

 

[francoHFW]

Does anyone find it a bit suspicious that their plan to combat global warming is to raise taxes...yeah we get it.

link? lol

To what, your brain? Have you misplaced it again?

^^

RW geniuses lol...

 

[francoHFW]

Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow

Of course not. See, there's your problem. You're just brainlessly parroting the fabricated stories that your masters told you to repeat.

Now, people of normal intelligence understand that snow in late November is common in the northern USA, and thus they laugh at anyone bleating the standard "Look! A snowflake! Global warming is a hoax!" denier cult mantra.

"Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” Dr. David Viner, a scientist with the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia, told the UK Independent in 2000.

East Angelia? Remember them? Hiding the decline Mann's Nature trick

Good times
--------------------------------------------------------
American scientist Wieslaw Maslowsk in 2007, who said that “you can argue that may be our projection of [an ice-free Arctic by 2013] is already too conservative.”

Yes, wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too conservative

------------------------------------------------------------------

“Warmer, earlier springs are a clear signal of a changing climate,” the group said. “March temperatures have grown 2.1 degrees (F) hotter, on average, in the United States since reliable record-keeping began in 1880s. Similarly, the first leaves have started appearing on plants several days earlier than they used to across the country.” Union of Concerned Scientists

ZOMG!!!

OMFG!!!!

Mamooth!!

A couple of twits at an obscure college in East Anglia mean NOTHING, despite Rush repeating a million times that it proves facts to be a hoax, hater dupes.

They were the premier "research" facility, I mean before they got caught fudging the data

WAYYYY out there lol...

 

[LordBrownTrout]

When I point out denialism is only a conspiracy cult, deniers should at least try to refrain from proving it by spewing more conspiracy babbling.

But then, deniers are now only preaching to the choir. Denier conspiracy ranting is like a crowd of Islamicists screaming "Allahu Ahkbar!". The point of it isn't to convert the infidels. The point of it is to whip up some mob enthusiasm, and to demonstrate to the other cultists what a loyal cultist you are yourself.

Many in climate change scam/hoax are trying to shut opposition down and have even alluded to the idea of criminal prosecution to the scientists who do not go along with the glowarm scam. It certainly does follow the allah akbar nuts who preach convert or die.

 

[francoHFW]

So damn dumb...

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Well, so what is Happening in South Dakota, Iowa, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan and Indiana today is a result of Global Warming? Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow and our children living on the coastlines would be dealing with flooding all the time being the north pole has melted?
It's only November 22, but it looks more like a typical January in the rust belt. Well, there u go. Lets hear your "Global Warming Explanations"

It's called winter and it happens every year idiot.

I think if global warming was true then winters would be getting warmer. You seem to imply that this is a typical winter that is not any warmer than another.

 

[Wyatt earp]

When I point out denialism is only a conspiracy cult, deniers should at least try to refrain from proving it by spewing more conspiracy babbling.

But then, deniers are now only preaching to the choir. Denier conspiracy ranting is like a crowd of Islamicists screaming "Allahu Ahkbar!". The point of it isn't to convert the infidels. The point of it is to whip up some mob enthusiasm, and to demonstrate to the other cultists what a loyal cultist you are yourself.

^^^^ ah shud up bitch and go pray to your hockey stick graph

Good now I don't have to hear how hot it is for at least 7 months.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

When I point out denialism is only a conspiracy cult, deniers should at least try to refrain from proving it by spewing more conspiracy babbling.

But then, deniers are now only preaching to the choir. Denier conspiracy ranting is like a crowd of Islamicists screaming "Allahu Ahkbar!". The point of it isn't to convert the infidels. The point of it is to whip up some mob enthusiasm, and to demonstrate to the other cultists what a loyal cultist you are yourself.

Tell us again how a model is superior to the satellite data

 

[bripat9643]

Well, so what is Happening in South Dakota, Iowa, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan and Indiana today is a result of Global Warming? Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow and our children living on the coastlines would be dealing with flooding all the time being the north pole has melted?
It's only November 22, but it looks more like a typical January in the rust belt. Well, there u go. Lets hear your "Global Warming Explanations"

Get This: Warming Planet Means More Snow: NPR

ROFL! Except before 1998 when it meant less snow.

I knew someone idiot would try that moronic argument.

 

[Circe]

When those hostile to the science of climate change point to snowy/blizzard conditions in northern states as 'proof' that the science is 'wrong,' they only exhibit their ignorance and stupidity.

Still ---- sooner or later it would be helpful to your global warming cause if something actually HAPPENED. Going on decade after decade with no change in the climate is not good for your argument.

The hockey-stick increase in human population since 1800 is of course bad for the world, but you chose the wrong way to show that: it's just not working and so most people don't believe it.

That doesn't mean that over population isn't a problem: many countries have tens of millions of people and no agriculture to speak of: Egypt, for instance. How long is that really a viable situation? The huge plastic islands floating in the Pacific, the blinding smog of Indonesia and China. The extinction of most large wild animals going on right now.

It's all a terrible problem: there needs to be 1/8 the human population we have now. (Achievable if every woman has no more than 1 child for three generations --- only.) However, pretending that the main problem is somehow a climate change that is not happening, that's not working. I'd say focus on another aspect of the problem.

 

[Fueri]

When I point out denialism is only a conspiracy cult, deniers should at least try to refrain from proving it by spewing more conspiracy babbling.

But then, deniers are now only preaching to the choir. Denier conspiracy ranting is like a crowd of Islamicists screaming "Allahu Ahkbar!". The point of it isn't to convert the infidels. The point of it is to whip up some mob enthusiasm, and to demonstrate to the other cultists what a loyal cultist you are yourself.

Questioning conclusions isn't a conspiracy, it is what science is supposed to do. We do it all the time in other fields. Question something here and you're a nut or _________(pick your label). That's not science, that's politics.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Well, so what is Happening in South Dakota, Iowa, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan and Indiana today is a result of Global Warming? Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow and our children living on the coastlines would be dealing with flooding all the time being the north pole has melted?
It's only November 22, but it looks more like a typical January in the rust belt. Well, there u go. Lets hear your "Global Warming Explanations"

It is the "paradoxical effect."

There aint nuthin an AGW Faith Based proponent cannot use as "evidence" for his or her fictional "theory."

Consensus (which is actually NOT a part of the scientific method) tells them so, even if they have to make up the "numbers" for that alleged consensus.

"It rained so hard the day I left,
the weather it was dry ...

The sun so hot,
I froze to death ...."​

Global WARMING! err. MAN MADE Global Warming!

 

[bripat9643]

Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow

Of course not. See, there's your problem. You're just brainlessly parroting the fabricated stories that your masters told you to repeat.

Now, people of normal intelligence understand that snow in late November is common in the northern USA, and thus they laugh at anyone bleating the standard "Look! A snowflake! Global warming is a hoax!" denier cult mantra.

1. “Due to global warming, the coming winters in the local regions will become milder.”
Stefan Rahmstorf, Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research, University of Potsdam, February 8, 2006

****

2. “Milder winters, drier summers: Climate study shows a need to adapt in Saxony Anhalt.”
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Press Release, January 10, 2010.

****

3. “More heat waves, no snow in the winter… Climate models… over 20 times more precise than the UN IPCC global models. In no other country do we have more precise calculations of climate consequences. They should form the basis for political planning… Temperatures in the wintertime will rise the most… there will be less cold air coming to Central Europe from the east…In the Alps winters will be 2°C warmer already between 2021 and 2050.”

Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, September 2, 2008.

****

10. “Winters with strong frost and lots of snow like we had 20 years ago will cease to exist at our latitudes.”

****

11. “Good bye winter. Never again snow?”
Spiegel, 1 April 2000
Mojib Latif, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, 1 April 2000

****

14. “Based on the rising temperature, less snow will be expected regionally. While currently 1/3 of the precipitation in the Alps falls as snow, the snow-share of precipitation by the end of the century could end up being just one sixth.”
Germanwatch, Page 7, Feb 2007

****

“ The ski areas that reliably have snow will shift from 1200 meters to 1500 meters elevation by the year 2050; because of the climate prognoses warmer winters have to be anticipated.”
Scinexx Wissenschaft Magazin, 26 Mar 2002

****

18. “Ice, snow, and frost will disappear, i.e. milder winters” … “Unusually warm winters without snow and ice are now being viewed by many as signs of climate change.”
Schleswig Holstein NABU, 10 Feb 2007

****

19. “Good bye winter… In the northern hemisphere the deviations are much greater according to NOAA calculations, in some areas up to 5°C. That has consequences says DWD meteorologist Müller-Westermeier: When the snowline rises over large areas, the bare ground is warmed up even more by sunlight. This amplifies global warming. A process that is uncontrollable – and for this reason understandably arouses old childhood fears: First the snow disappears, and then winter.”
Die Zeit, 16 Mar 2007

****

20. “Warm in the winter, dry in the summer … Long, hard winters in Germany remain rare: By 2085 large areas of the Alps and Central German Mountains will be almost free of snow. Because air temperatures in winter will rise more quickly than in summer, there will be more precipitation. ‘However, much of it will fall as rain,’ says Daniela Jacob of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology.”
FOCUS, 24 May 2006

And so on . . . . .

I could list dozens more like that.

 

[Circe]

Many in climate change scam/hoax are trying to shut opposition down and have even alluded to the idea of criminal prosecution to the scientists who do not go along with the glowarm scam. It certainly does follow the allah akbar nuts who preach convert or die.

They don't have the numbers (because it isn't happening) so instead they try to make thinking and speaking about the foolishness of the global warming idea illegal! It's so 1984. Our society is degenerating so fast into communist-style thought police. 2015 has been the year when what we used to have is all breaking up.

 

[bripat9643]

NY Times 2012: Snow a thing of the past
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/13/us/climate-change-threatens-ski-industrys-livelihood.html

It's a predicted eventuality, not something that will happen tomorrow. If you really understood science, you'd realize why there may be more snow as the climate warms. If the average winter temp warmed from 25 F to 28 F, for example, it would still snow, but the air at 28 F would hold more moisture, resulting in more snow.

NY Times 2012: Snow a thing of the past
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/13/us/climate-change-threatens-ski-industrys-livelihood.html

It's a predicted eventuality, not something that will happen tomorrow. If you really understood science, you'd realize why there may be more snow as the climate warms. If the average winter temp warmed from 25 F to 28 F, for example, it would still snow, but the air at 28 F would hold more moisture, resulting in more snow.

I understand abracadabra and flim-flam when I encounter it, and that's what you just posted.

 

[bripat9643]

Well, so what is Happening in South Dakota, Iowa, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan and Indiana today is a result of Global Warming? Wasn't one of the predictions of Global Warming that our children would never see snow and our children living on the coastlines would be dealing with flooding all the time being the north pole has melted?
It's only November 22, but it looks more like a typical January in the rust belt. Well, there u go. Lets hear your "Global Warming Explanations"

NY Times 2012: Snow a thing of the past

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/13/us/climate-change-threatens-ski-industrys-livelihood.html

thanks

hold the leftards to their words

After the Right changes their words.

You mean like that reporter tried to do to Donald Trump?