Assuming it was a hoax, what would be the goal of the global warming hoax?

[CultureCitizen]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

 

[Moonglow]

Nudist seeking to wear less clothes everywhere....

 

[Crick]

Manifold, per the denier types in this locale

1) Scientists get rich from research grants, they claim
2) Liberals wish to destroy the US or the world economy (because liberals hate everything)
3) Liberals wish to return to the pre-industrial era and live in caves wearing rabbit fur loincloths
4) Did I say scientists get rich from research grants? Yeah? Oh...

Well, I guess that's about it.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

Get the terminology right...

Global warming is soooo 1985

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Money

 

[Pogo]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

A sacrament in the Church of Contrarianism? (Rev. David Koch, high priest supreme, all hail His Holy Name....)

 

[Pete7469]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

Get the terminology right...

Global warming is soooo 1985

In 1977 it was a man made ice age.

I've got an idea, lets invent a problem that cannot be proven to not really exist since it happens naturally and insist that the cause is the fault of the prosperity of the greatest industrial and economic juggernaut the world has ever seen. We can use our influence in academia since we're all "scientists" or at least we can bullshit enough people to believe we are, along with a leftist media that hates capitalism in principle to convince a voting public that this "problem" can only be solved if their elected representatives give us billions of dollars to do more "research" while we fly around the world convincing people that all the "scientists" in the world need even more money to develop shit that no company would attempt to market because it will NEVER turn a profit and will have to be subsidized at tax payer expense.

In the mean time we can help other useless bed wetters like us get rich selling stupid shit like "carbon credits" to the mindless drones who our peers indoctrinate in public schools.

It's a fool proof....

No it's a fool dependent plan.

 

[CultureCitizen]

Nudist seeking to wear less clothes everywhere....

And getting rid of the neck tie...If that's all there is about it , count me in !!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

I think Otmar Edenhofer said it best... In an interview with Germany's NZZ reporter:


(EDENHOFER): Basically it’s a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization. The climate summit in Cancun at the end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War. Why? Because we have 11,000 gigatons of carbon in the coal reserves in the soil under our feet – and we must emit only 400 gigatons in the atmosphere if we want to keep the 2-degree target. 11 000 to 400 – there is no getting around the fact that most of the fossil reserves must remain in the soil.

(NZZ): De facto, this means an expropriation of the countries with natural resources. This leads to a very different development from that which has been triggered by development policy.

(EDENHOFER): "First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole."

CAGW or AGW or Global Warming or Climate Disruption or whatever name they call it, it has always been about power, control and wealth redistribution.. FROM DAY 1

Source


According to the Media Research Center, Edenhofer was “co-chair of the IPCC’s Working Group III, and was a lead author of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007

 

[CultureCitizen]

Manifold, per the denier types in this locale

1) Scientists get rich from research grants, they claim
2) Liberals wish to destroy the US or the world economy (because liberals hate everything)
3) Liberals wish to return to the pre-industrial era and live in caves wearing rabbit fur loincloths
4) Did I say scientists get rich from research grants? Yeah? Oh...

Well, I guess that's about it.

1) Ok , let's say scientists get rich, it still brings the question of why give money to the scientists, there must be an ulterior motive.
2) wtf? to what end? self anihilation?
3) Hmm , wearing rabbit fur loincloths, ah, that might have been a thing while I was in highschool. Live in caves? Hobbit style caves, count me in .

 

[Weatherman2020]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

Transfer of wealth, communism.

 

[Old Rocks]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

Get the terminology right...

Global warming is soooo 1985

In 1977 it was a man made ice age.

I've got an idea, lets invent a problem that cannot be proven to not really exist since it happens naturally and insist that the cause is the fault of the prosperity of the greatest industrial and economic juggernaut the world has ever seen. We can use our influence in academia since we're all "scientists" or at least we can bullshit enough people to believe we are, along with a leftist media that hates capitalism in principle to convince a voting public that this "problem" can only be solved if their elected representatives give us billions of dollars to do more "research" while we fly around the world convincing people that all the "scientists" in the world need even more money to develop shit that no company would attempt to market because it will NEVER turn a profit and will have to be subsidized at tax payer expense.

In the mean time we can help other useless bed wetters like us get rich selling stupid shit like "carbon credits" to the mindless drones who our peers indoctrinate in public schools.

It's a fool proof....

No it's a fool dependent plan.

Goddamn, you have repeatedly been shown that was not the case. Most of the people involved in research during that period were predicting a warming. Those that weren't, were worried about the aerosols put into the air by industry.

What 1970s science said about global cooling

The paper surveys climate studies from 1965 to 1979 (and in a refreshing change to other similar surveys, lists all the papers). They find very few papers (7 in total) predict global cooling. This isn't surprising. What surprises is that even in the 1970s, on the back of 3 decades of cooling, more papers (42 in total) predict global warming due to CO2 than cooling.

Figure 1: Number of papers classified as predicting future global cooling (blue) or warming (red). In no year were there more global cooling papers than global warming papers.

So in fact, the large majority of climate research in the 1970s predicted the Earth would warm as a consequence of CO2. Rather than climate science predicting cooling, the opposite is the case. Most interesting about Peterson's paper is not the debunking of an already well debunked skeptic argument but a succinct history of climate science over the 20th century, describing how scientists from different fields gradually pieced together their diverse findings into a more unified picture of how the climate operates.

 

[Old Rocks]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

Transfer of wealth, communism.

LOL. Another brain dead 'Conservative'. Answer to any question, Communism. Check under the bed tonight, Comrade, Putin may be hiding there.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

Transfer of wealth, communism.

LOL. Another brain dead 'Conservative'. Answer to any question, Communism. Check under the bed tonight, Comrade, Putin may be hiding there.

Got 70 years of Leftard worship of communism to validate it. You have wet dreams of it.

 

[CultureCitizen]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

Get the terminology right...

Global warming is soooo 1985

No , I will keep the warming adjective, since the overall effect of methane and co2 is warming.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Too Funny:

The alarmists think they can just spew their crap and everyone would believe them... Old Fraud posts the same crap over and over expecting a different result.

Their models are broken and fail 100% of the time..
Their predictions have failed over and over again..
The satellite data and US-CRN data shows their adjustments fraud..

It is a hoax designed to take freedoms away and assert power over the US and world populace, GLOBAL GOVERNANCE under SOCIALIST CONTROL.. It always has been..

 

[westwall]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

The two most simple reasons ever....money and power.

 

[CultureCitizen]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

Transfer of wealth, communism.

Transfer of wealth and communism are two VERY different things.
Did you know in the XIX century the US government engaged in one of the largest welfare programs in history by handing out land to anyone who worked on it ?

That said, I would rather like to know how installing a couple of pannels and a solar heater in a roof and using a 100 mpg vehicle brings any country closer to communism.

 

[CultureCitizen]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

The two most simple reasons ever....money and power.

Westwall, your explanation seems oversimplified, please ellaborate.

 

[Pete7469]

Many conservatives call global warming a hoax. Ok , for a moment I'll assume it is a hoax, but to what end?
Plain fun? Government controll ? International plot ?

The two most simple reasons ever....money and power.