OH my Knife-wielding man

[bigrebnc1775]

OK gun grabbers now what?

BEIJING (Reuters) - A knife-wielding man slashed 22 children and an adult at an elementary school in central China on Friday, state media reported, the latest in a series of attacks on schoolchildren in the country.

The man attacked the children at the gate of a school in Chenpeng village in Henan province, the Xinhua news agency reported.

Police arrested a 36-year-old man, identified as villager Min Yingjun, Xinhua said. It did not give further details of the extent of the injuries.
Knife-wielding man injures 22 children in China - Courant.com

 

[RDD_1210]

How many died and will never see their family again?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How many died and will never see their family again?

OH so that's your argument. The numbers of dead?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Yay,

Let's ban fucking knifes!!!

 

[zeke]

I am sure you think you are making some pertinent point big rebbie.
But it is a fuking stupid point, whatever it is.

You know why the fuker in China used a knife? Pay attention now; BECAUSE HE COULDN'T GET HIS HANDS ON A FUKING GUN.

Good God you fuking gun nuts are stupid.

 

[RDD_1210]

How many died and will never see their family again?

OH so that's your argument. The numbers of dead?

Sure is. Those kids in china will survive and get to live their lives. Let's compare that with the kids in CT who faced an attacker with a gun.

Thanks for proving the point that a lot more damage can be done when guns are used compared with knives.

Fail thread for you.

 

[ScienceRocks]

The second amendment is to keep your fascist fucking government in check. You don't fucking like that. Blow it up your fat communist ass!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How many died and will never see their family again?

OH so that's your argument. The numbers of dead?

Sure is. Those kids in china will survive and get to live their lives. Let's compare that with the kids in CT who faced an attacker with a gun.

Thanks for proving the point that a lot more damage can be done when guns are used compared with knives.

Fail thread for you.

Straw man is might tall their

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I am sure you think you are making some pertinent point big rebbie.
But it is a fuking stupid point, whatever it is.

You know why the fuker in China used a knife? Pay attention now; BECAUSE HE COULDN'T GET HIS HANDS ON A FUKING GUN.

Good God you fuking gun nuts are stupid.

OH so we must have a high body count to make a point?
liberal straw man.

 

[RDD_1210]

OH so that's your argument. The numbers of dead?

Sure is. Those kids in china will survive and get to live their lives. Let's compare that with the kids in CT who faced an attacker with a gun.

Thanks for proving the point that a lot more damage can be done when guns are used compared with knives.

Fail thread for you.

Straw man is might tall their

You've just proven the point of gun control advocates

Thanks!

</thread>

 

[ScienceRocks]

America is free because there was a time the government had to respect the people. Our founders wanted that!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Sure is. Those kids in china will survive and get to live their lives. Let's compare that with the kids in CT who faced an attacker with a gun.

Thanks for proving the point that a lot more damage can be done when guns are used compared with knives.

Fail thread for you.

Straw man is might tall their

You've just proven the point of gun control advocates

Thanks!

</thread>

Really straw man gun control works?
Explane how a state with some of the toughest gun laws could have a mass shooting?
Connecticut gun laws among the toughest in the U.S. - The York Daily Record

 

[RDD_1210]

Straw man is might tall their

You've just proven the point of gun control advocates

Thanks!

</thread>

Really straw man gun control works?
Explane how a state with some of the toughest gun laws could have a mass shooting?
Connecticut gun laws among the toughest in the U.S. - The York Daily Record

Because they're not tough enough.

Thanks for proving another point for gun control advocates.

Keep posting, you're doing all the legwork for me.

 

[ScienceRocks]

You're not taking my guns away EVER. FACT.

 

[zeke]

I am sure you think you are making some pertinent point big rebbie.
But it is a fuking stupid point, whatever it is.

You know why the fuker in China used a knife? Pay attention now; BECAUSE HE COULDN'T GET HIS HANDS ON A FUKING GUN.

Good God you fuking gun nuts are stupid.

OH so we must have a high body count to make a point?liberal straw man.

No buddie, you have to have a rational, thinking mind to make a point. You ain't got it.
Matter of fact, you are one of the more stupid gun nuts posting. Keep it up. Like I said yesterday, you gun nuts are allowing the crazy gun lovers to define this situation. Because you offer NOTHING to try and get control of this situation, you will not be happy with the outcome. True Americans will not stand by forever and allow this kind of carnage without trying to do something about it.

We have a problem. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
You are part of the problem and too stupid to know it. Thats my point.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You've just proven the point of gun control advocates

Thanks!

</thread>

Really straw man gun control works?
Explane how a state with some of the toughest gun laws could have a mass shooting?
Connecticut gun laws among the toughest in the U.S. - The York Daily Record

Because they're not tough enough.

Thanks for proving another point for gun control advocates.

Keep posting, you're doing all the legwork for me.

Really tall and fat straw man.

 

[RDD_1210]

Really straw man gun control works?
Explane how a state with some of the toughest gun laws could have a mass shooting?
Connecticut gun laws among the toughest in the U.S. - The York Daily Record

Because they're not tough enough.

Thanks for proving another point for gun control advocates.

Keep posting, you're doing all the legwork for me.

Really tall and fat straw man.

You don't understand the definition of strawman, do you?

 

[Old Rocks]

The Supreme Court has already ruled that we can control the type of guns sold to civilians, and who can buy them. Were our nation not awash is war weopons, the crazies here might be forced to use knives rather than AR 15's and AK 47's. And they would be far easier to take down.

It is time to take these guns off the street. Time to require the same kind of check in order to have a permit to own one as is required on a fully automatic weopon. After all, what is the differance in crowded mall or school between a fully automatic or a semi that can fire 30 shots in about ten second?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I am sure you think you are making some pertinent point big rebbie.
But it is a fuking stupid point, whatever it is.

You know why the fuker in China used a knife? Pay attention now; BECAUSE HE COULDN'T GET HIS HANDS ON A FUKING GUN.

Good God you fuking gun nuts are stupid.

OH so we must have a high body count to make a point?liberal straw man.

No buddie, you have to have a rational, thinking mind to make a point. You ain't got it.
Matter of fact, you are one of the more stupid gun nuts posting. Keep it up. Like I said yesterday, you gun nuts are allowing the crazy gun lovers to define this situation. Because you offer NOTHING to try and get control of this situation, you will not be happy with the outcome. True Americans will not stand by forever and allow this kind of carnage without trying to do something about it.

We have a problem. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
You are part of the problem and too stupid to know it. Thats my point.

You can't be rational if you promote gun control as a workable solution. Rational people like me can see it does not work. Idiots like you would keep doing the same thing hoping it will work the next time.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Because they're not tough enough.

Thanks for proving another point for gun control advocates.

Keep posting, you're doing all the legwork for me.

Really tall and fat straw man.

You don't understand the definition of strawman, do you?

Your post is an example.