Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If her cover as a covert agent was she worked for the CIA then HOW was disclosing she worked for the CIA bad for her cover?
How old are you? Just curious.
In other words you have no idea if the complaint was political or truthful. It is simply amazing how if a republican does something it is wrong, it is deceitful, it is political, but anyone does something against a republican and wham they are angels of truth and Justice.
tell me again what political party appointed the special prosecutor?
tell me again why the DCI, appointed by Bush, would lie for the purposes of politically damaging the president?
There is this complete lack of ability to accept the truth within the Current R ranks.
I just dont get how they think anyone will vote for a party that has to DENY FACTS to hold onto the pretense that their positions are defendable.
The Republican party is in BIG trouble.
Meanwhile we just had a thread about how the Democrats are being deserted in DROVES.....
started by your partner in crime, RSR, I trust?
Fraid not, it was by one of your liberal rabid wolf buddies, you know the ones you don't think matter so its ok to not call them on their fanatical stances.
That statute says that, to qualify as "covert", an employee must have been stationed in a foreign country within the past five years... which Plame hadn't been, when her name was released.It was clear from very early in the investigation that Ms. Wilson qualified under the relevant statute (Title 50, United States Code, Section 421) as a covert agent whose identity had been disclosed by public officials, including Mr. Libby, to the press.
Answer the question? or are you going to just tap dance and play RSR for us?
It is clear? Please provide the ACTUAL point that makes it true. Further explain how if she was a covert agent the switchboard at Langley freely identified her as working at and for the CIA.
The opinion is worthless without an actually explaination of HOW she met the standard. You can cite all the opinions you want. That does not make it fact.
If her cover as a covert agent was she worked for the CIA then HOW was disclosing she worked for the CIA bad for her cover?
That statute says that, to qualify as "covert", an employee must have been stationed in a foreign country within the past five years... which Plame hadn't been, when her name was released.
I guess little bully needs to call his friend Fitz and ask him to explain this little bit of "painful truth".
Sure thing, I ask again, if she were covert and was working for a front company, why was she A) driving to Langley and entering work through the front door... B) why did the switchboard at Langley freely identify her as working FOR the CIA .. C) Why did she allow her husband to have her photo appear in a national magazine and he routinely bragged about DC and to his friends she was working for the CIA.
Some Covert operative....
The person that drafted the law in question was clear, she did NOT meet the standards under the law. Whom shall i believe? The person who wrote the law OR a political hack and his allies?
Again, Libby was NOT convicted of OUTING her in the first place. Go read his conviction, he was not even CHARGED with break the law he was investigated for. It is ILOLEGAL to trap someone into a perjury charge, yet that is all that he was charged with, while others that had faulty memories were simply allowed to change their story. The man that OUTED her wasn't even charged, I am sure that his liberal bent had nothing to do with that at all.
The idea was to get Libby to roll on someone higher, by any means possible, and it failed. Pure politics. A sitting President commits Perjury to a Judge in a personal case effecting him and no one cares, BUT Libby misremembers something, corrrects it and he is tried for Perjury. lets look at the political parties of these two.... Shall we?
Sure thing, I ask again, if she were covert and was working for a front company, why was she A) driving to Langley and entering work through the front door... B) why did the switchboard at Langley freely identify her as working FOR the CIA .. C) Why did she allow her husband to have her photo appear in a national magazine and he routinely bragged about DC and to his friends she was working for the CIA.
Some Covert operative....
The person that drafted the law in question was clear, she did NOT meet the standards under the law. Whom shall i believe? The person who wrote the law OR a political hack and his allies?
Again, Libby was NOT convicted of OUTING her in the first place. Go read his conviction, he was not even CHARGED with break the law he was investigated for. It is ILOLEGAL to trap someone into a perjury charge, yet that is all that he was charged with, while others that had faulty memories were simply allowed to change their story. The man that OUTED her wasn't even charged, I am sure that his liberal bent had nothing to do with that at all.
The idea was to get Libby to roll on someone higher, by any means possible, and it failed. Pure politics. A sitting President commits Perjury to a Judge in a personal case effecting him and no one cares, BUT Libby misremembers something, corrrects it and he is tried for Perjury. lets look at the political parties of these two.... Shall we?
more than 50 % of the employees in her specialized dept had classified undercover status?
