O'Donnell just as dumb as Palin when it comes to Supreme Court knowledge

Christine O'Donnell Can't Name Recent Supreme Court Decision She Disagrees With - Video - The Daily Beast



And the idiots in this forum still believes she's well qualified because anything is better than a Democrat, in their minds that is. Pathetic.

O'Donnell is actually better at articulating the Republican talking points, but that's about it. Her stuff is canned and she can't move out of the can when someone tries to pry it open any wider. I have to say she's a lot easier on the ears than Sarah Palin, who usually has me scrambling for the mute button after about two minutes of listening to her screeching voice.
 
Topsin? Where'd ya go? Go to check on your portfoliop? Or maybe you had some chalanges?

Fucking mental midget.
 
how come you dont take Dean or Chris to task when they constantly bring up the same shit each time they post?.....:eusa_eh:

HE has 'em on Iggy, TOO!!!

ROFL2.gif
 
Well, Obama didn't know how many states make up our country. Personally, I wouldn't vote for someone THAT stupid.

Of course he knows, he just got mixed up briefly, but not knowing any Supreme Court cases? O'Donnell has absolutely no knowledge about cases she disagrees with and she wants to be a Senator. It makes the Tea Baggers look bad and further exposes their movement for the farce it is.

Wrong. She drew a blank. Admitting that she had drawn a blank (on the spot like that) is at least honest. When DICK Blumenthal, the idiot running as the liberal Democrat Senate nominee in Connecticut, was asked by his Republican opponent in a recent debate how he would "create" jobs, his answer was tragic. A masterpiece of liberal imbecility.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovIBLQyl7HE[/ame]

But at least he is also an abject liar. "When I got home from Vietnam." :eusa_liar:

What a scumbag.

Anyway, there's no reason to worry about Christine O'Donnell. It's not like she is going to win. But there is a distinct possibility that the scumbag in Connecticut, Dick Blumenidiot MIGHT get elected. :eek:

Speaking of tragic.

More Blummie...

The polls say job creation is the number one campaign issue, so the prize for proposal of the year goes to Connecticut Attorney General and Senate candidate Richard Blumenthal. Asked in a debate to justify the hundreds of lawsuits he's filed against companies—employers—in his state, the Democrat replied: "Our lawsuits, our legal actions, actually create jobs."

We've heard of those who believe we can spend our way to prosperity, and others want to inflate our way. But the shovel-ready lawsuit as an economic stimulus is a genuine novelty. Why didn't Congress think of that?

Perhaps Mr. Blumenthal was inspired by his record of suing telecom companies, computer makers, CD distributors, electronics retailers, drugstore chains, utilities, buyout firms, even mortuaries. If a business has an income statement, Mr. Blumenthal has sent it a subpoena.

The job creation is a little harder to credit, however. There's the case of toolmaker Stanley Works, which Mr. Blumenthal sued in 2002 to block it from relocating to Bermuda to save $30 million in corporate income taxes. A year later a less competitive Stanley laid off 1,000 workers. His 2003 suit against small business-owner Gina Malapanis inspired a counter-suit, and a jury awarded her $18 million from the state. We could go on.

Review & Outlook: Lawsuits as Job Creators - WSJ.com
 
Last edited:
so to sum up;

you have a speaker of the House, 3rd in line ofr the exec. mansion, who thinks that unemployment insurance and food stamps are the Bomb, economic growth wise.

We have a newby politico who, truth be told ( most everyone knows this) isn't sharpest knife in the drawer who cannot name a SC case she doesn't like.......I .....am....struggling.....for .....context....here .....help me Spock......:slap:
 
She definitely re-established her Bubblehead-status. How comical that Republicans feel "perky" is going to cancel-out feelings (most) Americans have of Republican-congressmen laying-back....for two years....drawing a check for yelling "NO!!"

I guess we'll have to stand-bye for O'Donnell's next campaign, seeing-as-how this talentless-bimbo requires some kind o' income....and, her perpetual-campaign-gig (rather than a real-job) is pretty-much all she's developed (as a job-skill).

Maybe she'd qualify as a "greeter", at a mega-church....somewhere.​

This is what is so sad and utterly PATHETIC about the dumb broad. She spent all these years "working" on her campaign as her only source of income and can't name a single SC decision she has a problem with. WTF...does the dunce have SOUP for brains?

And these are the dumb SAPS that Neo-CON$ like the fellow $tephanie reveres and wants in office.

Toast I say....TOAST!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

49izadw.gif
This country was toast the minute the idiot socialist in office was elected.
No doubt.....and, a couple-months AFTER....until His policies went-into-affect......

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y04g6OPLnQ[/ame]​
 
You don't want to compare an average Loyola MBA to a UNO acconting salary. trust me
 
I looked through the thread... I don't see Jimmy Carter mentioned once. Or any references to Clinton and 9/11.

WTF are you talkin about? Oh, more deflection. Got it.

Oh boy.. just a few weeks away!!!!!!

You're right I made it alllllll up, no one ever blamed Clinton for 9/11

Fox News Rewrites History In Order to Blame Bill Clinton for 9/11 - Ignore that link dont click it cause I made it up

STILL Blaming Jimmy Carter is also something I just made up. I promise not to blame Bush for 3 years ago if the right stops blaming FDR and Jimmy Carter after decades have passed
IBD: Carter More to Blame for Financial Crisis Than Bush or McCain | NewsBusters.org
Dont click that link, it's made up by me!! It's all a wonderful lie.

BTW...I said your crew blames Clinton for 9/11 I made no mention of in this thread. So if you take your time you woulda saved yourself some research and typing time.

Do you have a mental disorder? You said every thread. BTW.. that would include this one by definition.

Ok you win, not EVERY thread, Cool? But it's enough for you to drop your phoney act that Bush's actions have nothing to do with today or that the right didnt blame Clinton TILL THIS DAY for anything. You couldnt get a emmy with that act
 
I owned these dumb rightwing monkeys in every thread, look at all their responses to the OP I made, an OP which had a video showing just how dumb O'Donnell was and instead of demanding better candidates from the Republitards they worship they attack me and even Obama, are we the b lame for her inability to answer a question?
 
Lefties have some of the most vulgar mouths.
Yeah....where would this Country be, without the purity of 'Bagger-speak?

:rolleyes:

That's more laughable than most of the rubbish you post, Ms. She-man.

Pathetic.

A rag blog self-labeled "LA Progressive" [ :lol: ;rofl: ] by its idiot authors "quotes" a waitress and so it must be true! :cuckoo: :rofl:

The only reason a complete loser like you, She-man, cannot scrape the bottom of the barrel any lower is because you already dug clear through it.

You are one of the least persuasive and most totally dishonest members of the USMB, even by loser-lib standards.

:rofl:
 
I owned these dumb rightwing monkeys in every thread, look at all their responses to the OP I made, an OP which had a video showing just how dumb O'Donnell was and instead of demanding better candidates from the Republitards they worship they attack me and even Obama, are we the b lame for her inability to answer a question?

No we arent responsible for that stupidity but you are responsible for making the right wingers rack their memory for dumb things said by Dems as the deflection defense. I think what goes through their head is "If I can post dumb stuff said by someone else, maybe everyone will forget how dumb our candidate is"
 
Christine O'Donnell Can't Name Recent Supreme Court Decision She Disagrees With - Video - The Daily Beast



And the idiots in this forum still believes she's well qualified because anything is better than a Democrat, in their minds that is. Pathetic.


You are a loser dude.... Why don't you talk about the good things the Democrats have done instead of ripping on another person??? Oh that's right because your all mighty Democrats haven't done jack squat to help this country!
 
Liberals vote according to who speaks the best in public.... Conservatives vote according to who is going to do what is best for the country... Sad.
 
Funny how liberals don't post anything about the 100 seats they are going to lose in Congress and only post about the 10 they are favored to win...


:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
I owned these dumb rightwing monkeys in every thread, look at all their responses to the OP I made, an OP which had a video showing just how dumb O'Donnell was and instead of demanding better candidates from the Republitards they worship they attack me and even Obama, are we the b lame for her inability to answer a question?


You talk about how you own Republicans in this thread yet Republicans are going to take 100 seats from Democrats this fall..... :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Liberals vote according to who speaks the best in public.... Conservatives vote according to who is going to do what is best for the country... Sad.

Are you claiming that O'Donnell is whats best for the country? .....Sad
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top