Objectivism, Objectivists, and Randian Nonsense Otherwise Known as...

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Dante, Jan 13, 2009.

  1. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    nitwittism.


    :eusa_whistle:
     
  2. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    .



    .

     
  3. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    There is nothing objectionable to me about the concept that "A Distinct Reality Exists Independent Of Perception."
     
  4. garyd
    Offline

    garyd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,943
    Thanks Received:
    401
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Ratings:
    +401
    Then what is your objection to Objectivism?
     
  5. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    If they stopped there, there is none.

    If they buy into the blather that Rand though was reality?

    My objection is their complete lack of historical background that explain why things are as they are.

    We start from a place where the world is unfair, and now they demand a system that they describe as fair, but which rewards those what has who in most cases got their advantages unfairly.

    So...my grandfather left me a pile because he ripped off people.

    NOW I want a completely fair system because that pile I have would mean in that "fair system" I can enjoy my pile without guilt.

    In a nutshell, that is my complaint about most objectivist libertarians.

    The refuse to acknowledge that history plays a huge part in the state of affairs we find ourselves in today.
     
  6. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,299
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,306
    You disagree with Objectivism, yet you find nothing objectionable about the above concept. Uh, okay. :eusa_whistle:
     
  7. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    I've heard about it but don't know much about it except that it hasn't apparently had much of an influence. Or am I totally wrong?
     
  8. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    lol


    you'd get an argument from the followers because a few very influential people look like they may be Objectivists because they belong to Libertarian-like groups or belong or speak at the Federalist Society,..

    but reality says the no limits Free Markets kooks and other nitwits who espoused Randian bs during the last few GOP admins and congresses, are in hiding for a while.
     
  9. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    yes.

    There is nothing wrong with believing that one or a few of the premises of a kook like Ayn Rand are valid without buying into the false conclusions of their theories.

    okay?

    in short, it isn't the concept above I disagree with, it is the shit attached to it that takes it from that concept into Randian Objectivist nitwitticism
     
  10. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,299
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,306
    Of course, but you didn't explain why your were so against Randian Objectivism. Perhaps you've since then explained yourself, but we can't read your mind.

    Here's at least something to discuss:

    So what part of this do you disagree with and why?
     

Share This Page