DiamondDave
Army Vet
Fred was spot on about a lot... unfortunately for him and for the country, he ran a poor campaign
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.. more along the lines of just being good to see some others in this country waking up
Nobody is thinking this gets him out of office any sooner or anything of the sort
But nice try
Obama has a higher approval rating right now than His Holiness Ronald Reagan did, this time into his first term.
I've told Barack to go on vacation and stay away from the media, but does he listen to me? No.
What the Obamabots seem to forget is that we do not have to wait until 2012. Obamas low numbers will in fact affect the elections in November of this year. We are already seeing this in the polls in Massachusetts. Look at Senator Reids numbers. You can sit back and claim that polls don't make any difference, but they sure do paint an ugly picture for the Democrats right now.
yeah.........but heres the problem s0n..........everyone and his brother who has anything to do with the field of economics thinks that the future looks....ummmmmm bleak!!!
I gotta say...............what conservative could have ever pictured this back in November of 2008??? Even the most enthusiastic and resilient conservative could not have guessed that this Wizard of Oz president would do a b-line south in the polls at such a precipitous rate..............to the point where by the holiday season of 2009, the whole political dynamic has flipped 180 degree's!!!!!!!!!!
Who Kneeeeeeeeeeew???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What the Obamabots seem to forget is that we do not have to wait until 2012. Obamas low numbers will in fact affect the elections in November of this year. We are already seeing this in the polls in Massachusetts. Look at Senator Reids numbers. You can sit back and claim that polls don't make any difference, but they sure do paint an ugly picture for the Democrats right now.
Which is, again, exactly what happened with Reagan.
You're probably right, the Democrats will lose some seats, it's a very common occurrece at this point in the first term, in fact.
Though, if the economy recovers significantly enough by November, public opinion will probably swing crastically back the other way.
Which is, again, exactly what happened with Reagan.
You're probably right, the Democrats will lose some seats, it's a very common occurrece at this point in the first term, in fact.
Though, if the economy recovers significantly enough by November, public opinion will probably swing crastically back the other way.
your master has trained you well. always blame someone else for your failures.
By all accounts, the Obama depression is worsening.
yeah.........but heres the problem s0n..........everyone and his brother who has anything to do with the field of economics thinks that the future looks....ummmmmm bleak!!!
I gotta say...............what conservative could have ever pictured this back in November of 2008??? Even the most enthusiastic and resilient conservative could not have guessed that this Wizard of Oz president would do a b-line south in the polls at such a precipitous rate..............to the point where by the holiday season of 2009, the whole political dynamic has flipped 180 degree's!!!!!!!!!!
Who Kneeeeeeeeeeew???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, if you believe that FoxNews analysts and members of the Heritage Foundation consitute "Everyone and his brother who has anything to do with economics".
And to a person who buries their head in a comfortable right-wing bubble, like you do, I'm sure it seems that way.
First of all we have the results that are already in:Please feel free to quote an economist not on the government payroll who thinks the administration's policies will result in job creation and a growing economy.
And here's 200 of them, including 3 Nobel Prize winners, who opposed it a year ago. Looks like they were right.
The Congressional Budget Office pegged the number of jobs saved or created by the stimulus last year to between 800,000 and 2.4 million. Other economists said that the stimulus had a smaller impact; Moody's Economy.com found the stimulus created almost 1.6 million jobs and IHS/Global Insight said that it created about 1.25 million jobs.
Latest CBS News poll shows Obama's support dropping to an all time low...
___
Obama's Approval Rating Dips to New Low
President Obama's job approval rating has fallen to 46 percent, according to a new CBS News poll.
That rating is Mr. Obama's lowest yet in CBS News polling, and the poll marks the first time his approval rating has fallen below the 50 percent mark. Forty-one percent now say they disapprove of Mr. Obama's performance as president.
Obama's Approval Rating Dips to New Low - Political Hotsheet - CBS News
First of all we have the results that are already in:Please feel free to quote an economist not on the government payroll who thinks the administration's policies will result in job creation and a growing economy.
And here's 200 of them, including 3 Nobel Prize winners, who opposed it a year ago. Looks like they were right.
White House calls for jobs bill as it touts effects of stimulus on employment - TheHill.com
The Congressional Budget Office pegged the number of jobs saved or created by the stimulus last year to between 800,000 and 2.4 million. Other economists said that the stimulus had a smaller impact; Moody's Economy.com found the stimulus created almost 1.6 million jobs and IHS/Global Insight said that it created about 1.25 million jobs.
So it would appear that your 200 right-wing economists were in fact wrong, which is not surprising as they were all of the "Roosevelt destroyed the economy" revisionist history school of thought, as proved by the text of the petition itself.
And in fact, a year-and-a-half ago, economists supported Obama 2-to-1 over McCain.
Secondly most economists are criticizing Obama because they feel MORE Stimulus is needed, not less.
I'm sorry, but i just have this small problem with a "saved" job. Just how is that being defined these days? If you are working I guess Obama saved your job. What a crock.
I'm sorry, but i just have this small problem with a "saved" job. Just how is that being defined these days? If you are working I guess Obama saved your job. What a crock.
A "saved" job is one that would have otherwise been lost due to downsizing or a company going under.
Considering that in late 2008, a majority of economists thought that the country was almost certainly headed for a depression-level "recession", the stock market had fallen by 6000 points, and most of the major banks seemed on the verge of collapse... only a complete madman would consider the economy we have now to be "worse" than it would have been had no-one done anything about it.
Or a radical partisan.
Latest CBS News poll shows Obama's support dropping to an all time low...
___
Obama's Approval Rating Dips to New Low
President Obama's job approval rating has fallen to 46 percent, according to a new CBS News poll.
That rating is Mr. Obama's lowest yet in CBS News polling, and the poll marks the first time his approval rating has fallen below the 50 percent mark. Forty-one percent now say they disapprove of Mr. Obama's performance as president.
Obama's Approval Rating Dips to New Low - Political Hotsheet - CBS News
Just 41 percent now approve of his handling of the economy, which Americans say is the nation's most pressing issue. Forty-seven percent disapprove. The president's marks on handling health care, with reforms still under debate in Congress, are even lower just 36 percent approve, while 54 percent disapproved
I'm sorry, but i just have this small problem with a "saved" job. Just how is that being defined these days? If you are working I guess Obama saved your job. What a crock.
A "saved" job is one that would have otherwise been lost due to downsizing or a company going under.
Considering that in late 2008, a majority of economists thought that the country was almost certainly headed for a depression-level "recession", the stock market had fallen by 6000 points, and most of the major banks seemed on the verge of collapse... only a complete madman would consider the economy we have now to be "worse" than it would have been had no-one done anything about it.
Or a radical partisan.
I'm sorry, but i just have this small problem with a "saved" job. Just how is that being defined these days? If you are working I guess Obama saved your job. What a crock.
A "saved" job is one that would have otherwise been lost due to downsizing or a company going under.
Considering that in late 2008, a majority of economists thought that the country was almost certainly headed for a depression-level "recession", the stock market had fallen by 6000 points, and most of the major banks seemed on the verge of collapse... only a complete madman would consider the economy we have now to be "worse" than it would have been had no-one done anything about it.
Or a radical partisan.
I'm sorry, but i just have this small problem with a "saved" job. Just how is that being defined these days? If you are working I guess Obama saved your job. What a crock.
A "saved" job is one that would have otherwise been lost due to downsizing or a company going under.
Considering that in late 2008, a majority of economists thought that the country was almost certainly headed for a depression-level "recession", the stock market had fallen by 6000 points, and most of the major banks seemed on the verge of collapse... only a complete madman would consider the economy we have now to be "worse" than it would have been had no-one done anything about it.
Or a radical partisan.
Vast, the definition was changed by the adminstration earlier this week. It is now defined as saved if the government supplied any money to fund the job. That means even if the job never materializes, it is still a job.