Obama Said No Serious Person Believes that U.S. Election Can Be Rigged

[buckeye45_73]

"There is no serious person out there," said Obama barely two years ago, "who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America's elections, in part because they're so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved." He said this before the 2016 election, when Trump was voicing concern that the election would be rigged. Obama added that there was no evidence that this had happened in the past and no evidence that it could happen in that election, and that Trump should stop "whining" about the election being rigged and go out and try to get more votes.

Here's the video, if you doubt any of this:

Rigged vs. Influenced...

Think about it, come on, you can get there...

Are you seriously trying to channel Bill Clinton and his 'definition of the word 'is' defense?

Come on now, even you are not stupid enough not to know the difference between rigged and influenced.

Or am I giving you too much credit?

Ok the DNC rigged their election. Now to influenced.....who did Russia influence and how? Putin made Trump talk about tariffs and get the white working class in Michigan?

 

[easyt65]

The russia thing is about spreading misinformation and propaganda in order to fool people .

And how do you measure something like that?

By the evidence showing Russia used a military-style Counter-Intelligence Operation using social media that successfully resulted in snowflakes ORGANIZING and MARCHING FOR Russia...

By the evidence that shows Russia paid WILLING Liberal groups - like Antifa / Black Lives Matter / the Black Fist - to spread racial division and violence...

By being educated / familiar enough with Counter-Intelligence operations to know what their goal is and how they operate.

For instance, INSTABILITY and DIVISION are the 2 biggest goals.

THINK for a second - do you get more instability by helping a candidate become the clear-cut winner...or by sewing doubt, chaos, and division?

All it takes to succeed is to get about 15-20% of the population to buy into the conspiracy theory / idea that the winner is not the LEGITIMATE winner...and you have an immediately split nation and a government spending most of its time defending its legitimacy and fighting off hate.

Sound familiar?

WHY would the Russians leak DNC e-mails exposing the fact that Hillary and the DNC screwed Bernie, rigged primaries, cheated in debates, engaged in election fraud, and broke laws to try to win?

-- If Hillary won there would be a part of the population declaring her to be an illegitimate President because she cheated and broke laws to win.

The Russians covered both bases, though......Trump won...and the nation is still divided with part of the country thinking the Russians helped him win, even colluded with him to make it happen...which there is no proof of.

The Counter-Intelligence Op and plan the Russians ran worked FAR better than they ever hoped.

 

[bendog]

He means litteral hacking and changing votes .

The russia thing is about spreading misinformation and propaganda in order to fool people .

Show us on the doll where Putin touched you to make you flip your vote

Lol. How many threads here were posted based on fake Russian stories. ?

Yeah, the Russians didn't "hijack" the election. Fox was telling fools that Hillary was taking their guns. What Russia did was take social media user data (supplied by users themselves to identify their likes and dislikes) and target them with specific media stories. Like Podesta being a pedophile. And it still goes on. The Russians are saying Hillary got 400 million or something in Russian money. The Russians target people who are prone to believing Trump, and that Hillary is some archdemon criminal mastermind. They can probably get out 300-500K votes, and depress another like amount.

You probably can't actually alter votes cast to do much than swing a few key districts in a given state. But you can affect opinion, and when that is coupled with an idiot FBI director who makes a statement reinforcing those opinions, and which later turns out to be baseless, you can swing an election.

Not that Hillary of the dems have anyone to fault for Hillary's emails or whoring the Sec. of State office.

 

[easyt65]

But you can affect opinion, and when that is coupled with an idiot FBI director who makes a statement reinforcing those opinions, and which later turns out to be baseless, you can swing an election.

Not that Hillary of the dems have anyone to fault for Hillary's emails or whoring the Sec. of State office.

Baseless?

Hillary Clinton was illegally operating an unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured server illegally containing TOP SECRET+ data - data Obama himself called 'so classified it can not be released in any format because it would cause grave damage to our national security' - on it.

Despite claiming not to have known about it until he read it in the media, evidence shows the lying SOB had known for a while, that he had been e-mailing her using an alias.

Obama had known about her illegal activity and jeopardizing national security WHILE he knew the Russians were attempting to hack senior level politicians' computers / servers yet said nothing about it and did nothing about it.

In essence, Obama KNEW about the Russian meddling and facilitated it - allowed them to continue. He could have warned Hillary, could have shut her server down. Instead he allowed her to serve up TOP SECRET+ data not only to the Russians but to 5 other foreign entities who also acquired the classified data, ACCORDING TO THE FBI.

Baseless BULLSHIT! I guess if you continue to keep your head up your ass and refuse to acknowledge all the evidence that proves differently you can claim it's baseless'.