Obama: "Parasites of the World Unite"

The libertarian, by nature, is a criminal.

The philosophy, though those who try to pretend that it has no values, is criminal.

The powerful get to screw the weak.
 
Yeah! And try not use one of those damn socialist federal highways on your way to your little revolution at the WH :lol::lol::lol::eusa_whistle:

Private Roads Work


by Bart Frazier


Though they are few and far between, there are some examples in the United States of functioning private roads.

Probably the most common are in private neighborhoods. Many homeowner associations maintain their own road systems, one of which I described in my article “The Lake of the Woods.”

So there are enough private roads connected to give you a conscience-free route to your cute little revolt at the WH? Do tell.

Well, I have demonstrated that Private Roads exist. And if the fucking government were to get the fuck out of the way all roads would be privately owned.

But don't sweat it, the fuckers won't get out of the way. By monopolizing the goddamned roads they can reduce the right to travel to a "privilege" and they will have the authority to detain and search the vehicle because according to their fascist logic " you had no expectation of privacy when you drive on government roads"..

As always, Heil Hitler.

.
 
The banks are the parasites.

Who collects 19% interest and adds nothing to the economy?

Chris - that was by far the dumbest thing ever posted on this site. First of all, why do people go to banks if they serve no purpose? That common sense point alone defeats your very ignorant statement there.

But more importantly, how could our economy grow without banks? Most small business owners take loans from banks (new small business = growing economy). 99.9999% of all homeowners take loans from banks to purchase their home (new homes being built = growing economy). Many have taken loans from banks to purchase new vehicles (automobile sales = growing economy).

We could go on forever, but I think even a moron would realize you just made one of the most asinine statements in world history. Banks add more to the economy than just about any other industry.
 
The libertarian, by nature, is a criminal.

The philosophy, though those who try to pretend that it has no values, is criminal.

The powerful get to screw the weak.

Damn! Did it hurt when you winched another king sized turd out of your ass?

That type of thinking, kwc57, is why you will never be in power.

Your type of thinking JakeFakey is why no one ever takes you serious and thinks you're a loon.

Explain for the class why a libertarian is a "criminal". Provide evidence for the class where libertarian philosophy espouses the powerful screwing the weak. Then demonstrate for the class how you pull a king sized turd out of your ass.

moron
 
Last edited:
In 1944, John T. Flynn put forth eight points that he considered the main marks of the fascist state. They include: 1) government acknowledges no restraint on its powers, 2) government is a de facto dictatorship, with one sector dominating, 3) a capitalist system is administered by the government using an immense bureaucracy, 4) Producers are organized into cartels with special politically-granted privileges (syndicalism), 5) Economic planning is based on autarky (requiring extremely large territory and trade hegemony), 6) Economic life is sustained through spending and borrowing, 7) Militarism is the mainstay of government spending, and 8) Military spending has imperialist (global) aims.

Not too bad. But Flynn emphasized the economic aspects of the Fascist and Nazi states excessively. Even so, you'll note that 1, 2, 7, and 8 -- half of the points -- are non-economic, and there are no social democracies that match those descriptions. Social democracies acknowledge restraints on government power; they are not dictatorships but democratic republics; militarism is not the mainstay of government spending (that's more nearly true here), and military spending does not have imperialist aims (again, that's more nearly true here).

In fact, the other four points aren't descriptive of social democracy, either, not when you get down to the details and look at what fascist states actually DID economically.

I would argue that fascism is not economic at all, and that the only thing a fascist state cares about w/r/t the economy is whether it serves the political and military interests of the state. A fascist state wants an economy that produces, that provides full employment and hence contributes to public satisfaction, and that it can control. Both Italy and Germany found that leaving the economy mostly in private hands but rigidly controlling it served that purpose well. If a full-fledged socialist economy had served their political and military interests better, they'd have had one. What they cared about was political power and nationalistic ambition (and in Hitler's case, race), not economics.

Calling social democracies "fascist" because they share some superficial non-defining characteristics with historical fascist states is absurd. They have none of the features of fascist states that any reasonable person objects to.
 
You are truly an idiot of epic proportions.

Please see my signature.

You might want to consider not wasting bandwidth further with pointless, gratuitous insults that really say nothing bad about the person they're directed towards but do suggest that your mother raised you without any manners and you still need to grow up. Just a suggestion, of course.

There is no "best feature" of Soviet-sytle Socialism. None.

Sure there is, several of them in fact. Full employment, relatively narrow income gaps, high levels of economic security. If the system had literally NOTHING going for it, the Russian people wouldn't have supported it for more than seventy years.

In spite of which it didn't compare favorably to the social democracies of western Europe and (at that time) the U.S., any more than laissez-faire capitalism did (although for different reasons). So I'm certainly not recommending that system. But to claim that it had no beneficial features at all is nonsensical hyperbole.
 
And yet banks and corpoyations are hoarding record amounts of cash.

Also strange that Pub whites are on welfare and other entitlements at the same rate as white Dems. The whole argument is pure pubcrappe.
 
The Cold War is over, we won.

We have an Alinsky trained Marxist in the Whitehouse and a general strike demanding Marxism.

I'm not so sure we won.

There is no frontier anymore, health care exists and is expensive,

It's expensive because it is a limited resource. All you communists want is for government to decide who lives and dies, rather than the ability to pay.

colleges and training exist and we need all that to compete today.

Putting stupid people in college just diminishes the value of a college education.

Health and college costs doubled under Booosh, the country and the non rich are falling apart under voodoo, and the BS GOP of today seems to be only supported by brainwashed haters and morons. Change the channel, doofus.

Give someone like you a PhD. and they'll still be retarded, making the idea of a PhD. suspect.
 
Welcome to the nutbag convention. :cuckoo:

Yep. People who aren't nutbags pretend to be black, that makes you as sane as they come, my friend. Where am I on you sig by the way? Pointing out you're trying to be black? Did too many people tell you I was right?

OK, I'll throw you a bone. Right on, bro...
 

Forum List

Back
Top