trying to tie in the housing bubble with the others stuff is silly. your recipe is: throw everything in and stir
facts are facts. the Congressional record has the facts. you take things from different years and string them together out of context. Fact is Frank and others tried to fix F&F. The GOP threw monkey wrenches into every effort to fix things. They called it interfering in the free market.
--------------------------------------------------------------
http://mediamatters.org/research/200901080014
In 2005, while the Democrats were still in the minority, Frank contributed to a bipartisan effort to put his objectives -- tighter regulation of Fannie and Freddie and new funds for rental housing -- into law.
At the time, Fannie and Freddie were regulated by a small agency within the Department of Housing and Urban Development; the bill proposed to create an independent agency to monitor their operations.
Frank and Michael Oxley, who was then chairman of the Financial Services Committee, achieved broad bipartisan support for the bill in the committee, and it passed the House.
But the Senate never voted on the measure, in part because President Bush was likely to veto it.
"If it had passed, that would have been one of the ways we could have reined in the bowling ball going downhill called housing," Oxley told me. "Barney, to some extent, is misunderstood -- with this image of him as a fierce partisan. He is an institutionalist. He believes in the House and in the process. He eschews the grandstanding style that so many members use and prefers to work behind the scenes and get something done."
facts are facts. the Congressional record has the facts. you take things from different years and string them together out of context. Fact is Frank and others tried to fix F&F. The GOP threw monkey wrenches into every effort to fix things. They called it interfering in the free market.
--------------------------------------------------------------
http://mediamatters.org/research/200901080014
In 2005, while the Democrats were still in the minority, Frank contributed to a bipartisan effort to put his objectives -- tighter regulation of Fannie and Freddie and new funds for rental housing -- into law.
At the time, Fannie and Freddie were regulated by a small agency within the Department of Housing and Urban Development; the bill proposed to create an independent agency to monitor their operations.
Frank and Michael Oxley, who was then chairman of the Financial Services Committee, achieved broad bipartisan support for the bill in the committee, and it passed the House.
But the Senate never voted on the measure, in part because President Bush was likely to veto it.
"If it had passed, that would have been one of the ways we could have reined in the bowling ball going downhill called housing," Oxley told me. "Barney, to some extent, is misunderstood -- with this image of him as a fierce partisan. He is an institutionalist. He believes in the House and in the process. He eschews the grandstanding style that so many members use and prefers to work behind the scenes and get something done."
Last edited: