Obama loses the once bragged about lead with women voters

Did any of you conservatives who keep complaining about 'skewed' polls complain about the Pew Poll?

It has a 5 point 'oversample' of Republicans. 36% to 31%.
 
What's obvious is that no Democrat has appointed a moderate in decades! It's the Republicans that have appointed those. One more example of how you folks on the far left are always accusing "us" of being "extreme" when in fact it's YOU that appoint far left ideologues every chance you get.

The reason you can't name a moderate appointed by a Democrat is that THEY DON'T EXIST!!!!

What justices are you considering "moderate"?

Kennedy, Souter, O'Connor, Stevens and Roberts? All appointed by Republicans. So name one "moderate" Justice that was named by a Democrat, Candy...

The truth is...you can't...because Democrats don't choose moderates...they choose far left Justices like Ginsberg, Kagan and Sotomayor.

Yet you come on here and accuse the GOP of being the Party that nominates "extreme" Justices. It's why I find the progressives here so amusing...

So you pick some justices appointed by Republicans and call them moderates but ignore Scalia and Thomas 2/9 of the court?

So, accoring to you we have the following extremeists appointed by Republicans:

Scalia, Alito, and Thomas.

We have the following extremeists appointed by Democrats:

Kagan, Sotomayor, and Ginsberg

And the following are moderates accoring to you appointed by Republicans.

Kennedy, Stevens, and Roberts (whom I guess is now considered a moderate???).

The republican record is 3 extremeists and 3 "moderates" counting Roberts as a moderate. So it's a 50/50 chance that a Republican will appoint a caveman--according to your statistics. No thanks.
 
Did any of you conservatives who keep complaining about 'skewed' polls complain about the Pew Poll?

It has a 5 point 'oversample' of Republicans. 36% to 31%.

I guess their red-hot magnifying glass got sort of cloudy when Romney started winning. Amazing how the "fair and balanced" crew missed that one.
 
Yup, it is you, who were mention "bad" democrats without talking about "bad" pubs, although homes like Alito, Scalia, and Thomas were pointed out twice.

Act the dick, get treated like a prick.

Now, you modify it as ou should have in the beginning.

Balance in your accusations, boy, balance.

This is better.

Try to keep up, Jake...

I didn't say that Republicans hadn't named any far right Justices...I simply pointed out that Republicans are the only ones that named Justices that were moderates. How that makes me a "lying fuck", you'll have to explain.

I didn't "modify" anything...you not being bright enough to understand my point isn't my problem...it's your problem. Balance? What the heck are you babbling about? You just accused me of being a "lying fuck" because I pointed out a MASSIVE flaw in Candy's notion that we can't elect a Republican because they will appoint "extreme" Justices to the high court.

Now would you like to help out Candy by pointing out all of the "moderate" Justices that have been appointed by Democrats? She seems to be struggling with that.

I would imagine that if Mitt Romney WERE to appoint a Supreme Court Justice that his choice would be another moderate judge. Why do I say that? Because Mitt Romney is a moderate. Duh?
 
Did any of you conservatives who keep complaining about 'skewed' polls complain about the Pew Poll?

It has a 5 point 'oversample' of Republicans. 36% to 31%.

I guess their red-hot magnifying glass got sort of cloudy when Romney started winning. Amazing how the "fair and balanced" crew missed that one.

Oddly,

the turnaround in the results of this poll vs. their last one almost exactly matched their turnaround in how many R's vs. D's they polled.

What's funnier is, unskewedpolls.com called the skewing in this one a big Zero. lol
 
Last edited:
Did any of you conservatives who keep complaining about 'skewed' polls complain about the Pew Poll?

It has a 5 point 'oversample' of Republicans. 36% to 31%.

I guess their red-hot magnifying glass got sort of cloudy when Romney started winning. Amazing how the "fair and balanced" crew missed that one.

Oddly,

the turnaround in the results of this poll vs. their last one almost exactly matched their turnaround in how many R's vs. D's they polled.

What's funnier is, unskewedpolls.com called the skewing in this one a big Zero. lol

I've been too busy with a plumbing nightmare at work for the last couple days to keep up with the thread. BUT Had i known about the poll being oversampled in our favor i would call it bunk as well.
 
Did any of you conservatives who keep complaining about 'skewed' polls complain about the Pew Poll?

It has a 5 point 'oversample' of Republicans. 36% to 31%.

I'm not a conservative but yes I complain if the poll is skewed either way. It should be a balanced sample or else you get unbalanced results.

With over 95% of polls oversampling democrats this poll's oversampling of republicans was the anomoly and not the norm.
 
What justices are you considering "moderate"?

Kennedy, Souter, O'Connor, Stevens and Roberts? All appointed by Republicans. So name one "moderate" Justice that was named by a Democrat, Candy...

The truth is...you can't...because Democrats don't choose moderates...they choose far left Justices like Ginsberg, Kagan and Sotomayor.

Yet you come on here and accuse the GOP of being the Party that nominates "extreme" Justices. It's why I find the progressives here so amusing...

So you pick some justices appointed by Republicans and call them moderates but ignore Scalia and Thomas 2/9 of the court?

So, accoring to you we have the following extremeists appointed by Republicans:

Scalia, Alito, and Thomas.

We have the following extremeists appointed by Democrats:

Kagan, Sotomayor, and Ginsberg

And the following are moderates accoring to you appointed by Republicans.

Kennedy, Stevens, and Roberts (whom I guess is now considered a moderate???).

The republican record is 3 extremeists and 3 "moderates" counting Roberts as a moderate. So it's a 50/50 chance that a Republican will appoint a caveman--according to your statistics. No thanks.

And what are the chances that a Democrat will appoint a moderate? Zero? You just can't bring yourself to admit that your party has been the one who's been appointing nothing BUT extreme Justices for years now and the GOP...the party you ACCUSE of appointing extreme Justices is in fact the only one to appoint moderate Justices.

Reality is a bitch...isn't it, Candy?
 
Stop it, Oldstyle. The GOP presidents were not trying to appoint moderates but instead hardcore conservatives. They got fooled.
 
Stop it, Oldstyle. The GOP presidents were not trying to appoint moderates but instead hardcore conservatives. They got fooled.

They got fooled on all those Justices? LOL

Who are you kidding, Jake! The truth of the matter is that those GOP Presidents you refer to were in reality much more moderate than you folks on the Left ever would admit.

They named some moderates.

Can the same be said for Democratic Presidents? Name the last "moderate" that was named by a Democrat?
 
If you mean Eisenhower, and Nixon, and Ford, and George H W Bush, yes, they were moderate.

To today's far right, they are all a buncha socialists!
 
I'm not a conservative but yes I complain if the poll is skewed either way. It should be a balanced sample or else you get unbalanced results.

Then you don't understand how polling works.

I completely understand how polling works which is why I never put much stock in individual polls. Instead I look at the sample base of a specific polling institution and compare the sample base to the results over time to try and get a feel for the direction of things.

Don't be a dick just to be a dick man, if you want to act all smart at least explain it to the person your trying to have a wisenheimer attitude with ;).
 
I'm not a conservative but yes I complain if the poll is skewed either way. It should be a balanced sample or else you get unbalanced results.

Then you don't understand how polling works.

I completely understand how polling works which is why I never put much stock in individual polls. Instead I look at the sample base of a specific polling institution and compare the sample base to the results over time to try and get a feel for the direction of things.

Don't be a dick just to be a dick man, if you want to act all smart at least explain it to the person your trying to have a wisenheimer attitude with ;).
well no doubt direction of polls have gone romney way since first debate
 
A 12 point swing in the latest PEW poll says it all. They could only pad the polls for so long. It seems their train has derailed BIG TIME

He got it back:


Screen-Shot-2013-03-12-at-4.22.22-PM.png


What happened?
 
Obama loses the once bragged about lead with women voters

He never lost it, apparently, and that bodes badly for GOP candidates who not reach out honestly women voters.
 

Forum List

Back
Top