Obama Legacy. Federal Land Grab Records.

[Papageorgio]

Baloney, your drama is almost amusing. Changing a designation is not a disrespect it is an examination to see if there is too much government overreach.

110 years, never been done.

So, aren't you a progressive? 100 years ago there was no gay marriage, 100 years ago we had no cell phones.

Times change for the better and we just roll with it.

If you want to change the law, go for it. Of course, that is not likely to happen. Most states do not have huge portions of public lands in their boundaries, but they enjoy the benefits of being part owners. It is unlikely that those states will want to hand over all those resources and wealth to a handful of big western states.

If Trump re-designates the land in question, then we don't need to change the law. If you don't like the idea that Trump will determine the fate of the land, I suggest you change the law.

Trump can not redesignate the land by himself. He needs Congress. Congress gave the duty of naming National Monuments to the Presidents and only Congress can change that. Trump's EO only orders a study to be made and that it be given to Congress as a guide of recommendations.
The trump cult is celebrating and cheering trump an EO regarding National Monuments, but they don't even know what it says or might do. It is like many of trump's EO's, talk with no walk.

We can hope that Congress goes along with him.

 

[rightwinger]

Why would. Trump celebrate giving back national monuments?

 

[mamooth]

BLM land should be sold to the states, that way it can be used in a much more efficient and local away.

No, because the states are far more corrupt than the feds. Every conservative state would quickly see the land given away to Republican political donors for pennies on the dollar. I hope you don't embarrass yourself by denying that. After all, for conservatives, that's the whole point, to make a quick buck by using corruption to steal the people's land.

Now the federal agencies, being a bureaucracy, are immune to such bribery, so they're far less corrupt. They're not perfect, but they're far better than the alternatives.

 

[Papageorgio]

BLM land should be sold to the states, that way it can be used in a much more efficient and local away.

No, because the states are far more corrupt than the feds. Every conservative state would quickly see the land given away to Republican political donors for pennies on the dollar. I hope you don't embarrass yourself by denying that. After all, for conservatives, that's the whole point, to make a quick buck by using corruption to steal the people's land.

Now the federal agencies, being a bureaucracy, are immune to such bribery, so they're far less corrupt. They're not perfect, but they're far better than the alternatives.

Got any proof or is this more lefty lies?

 

[Auld Phart]

BLM land should be sold to the states, that way it can be used in a much more efficient and local away.

No, because the states are far more corrupt than the feds. Every conservative state would quickly see the land given away to Republican political donors for pennies on the dollar. I hope you don't embarrass yourself by denying that. After all, for conservatives, that's the whole point, to make a quick buck by using corruption to steal the people's land.

Now the federal agencies, being a bureaucracy, are immune to such bribery, so they're far less corrupt. They're not perfect, but they're far better than the alternatives.

Got any proof or is this more lefty lies?

rhetorical question?

 

[Rustic]

BLM land should be sold to the states, that way it can be used in a much more efficient and local away.

No, because the states are far more corrupt than the feds. Every conservative state would quickly see the land given away to Republican political donors for pennies on the dollar. I hope you don't embarrass yourself by denying that. After all, for conservatives, that's the whole point, to make a quick buck by using corruption to steal the people's land.

Now the federal agencies, being a bureaucracy, are immune to such bribery, so they're far less corrupt. They're not perfect, but they're far better than the alternatives.

There's nothing more corrupt than the federal government...