Obama Kicked GOP Ass Today.

Here's one irrefutable way to show who did well and who didn't in this Q and A. MSNBC is giving it more coverage than Foxnews, in fact MSNBC has been doing the last hour on it.

Foxnews is all but burying it. If the president hadn't kicked ass, Foxnews would be running it in an all day production.

FoxNews isn't spinning it like MSLSD.

We expect partisan hackery from MSLSD. They take this non-event and try to spin it into a big "victory" for the President.

FoxNews, being much more objective and much more honest, sees that it's largely a non-news story and moved on.
 
Obama kicked your right winged asses and if you were honest, you would admit it. Take you lumps....TAKE THEM!
 
Obama kicked your right winged asses and if you were honest, you would admit it. Take you lumps....TAKE THEM!

He did not. And if you were honest, the world might stop spinning on its axis. [We don't know for sure what the consequences might be of you being honest. There's no precedent for it.]

The truth (still just an alien notion to you and your ilk, autozona) is that the President did an ok job. Just fair.

So did the GOP reps.
 
Here's one irrefutable way to show who did well and who didn't in this Q and A. MSNBC is giving it more coverage than Foxnews, in fact MSNBC has been doing the last hour on it.

Foxnews is all but burying it. If the president hadn't kicked ass, Foxnews would be running it in an all day production.

FoxNews isn't spinning it like MSLSD.

We expect partisan hackery from MSLSD. They take this non-event and try to spin it into a big "victory" for the President.

FoxNews, being much more objective and much more honest, sees that it's largely a non-news story and moved on.

Just like the Okeefe story?

Here is a hint, if fox wont report on it, IT SCREAMS A VICTORY FOR THE LEFT.
 
Last edited:
The fact that the Republicans invited him to speak at their retreat shows how much the Republicans are committed to Bi-Partisanship. The Democrats have never invited a Republican President to speak at their similar gatherings. He didn't kick anyone's a*s. He did come off as still being a bit partisan though. Give the Republicans some credit. Just inviting a Democratic President to speak at their retreat was a bold move. Now this President needs to start scolding his fellow Democrats on their petty partisan behavior. Unlock those meeting room doors and maybe something can get done.
 
The fact that the Republicans invited him to speak at their retreat shows how much the Republicans are committed to Bi-Partisanship. The Democrats have never invited a Republican President to speak at their similar gatherings. He didn't kick anyone's a*s. He did come off as still being a bit partisan though. Give the Republicans some credit. Just inviting a Democratic President to speak at their retreat was a bold move. Now this President needs to start scolding his fellow Democrats on their petty partisan behavior. Unlock those meeting room doors and maybe something can get done.
Yes, they have.

Bush on Charm Offensive at Democratic Retreat - ABC News

Pretty sure he didn't take questions though.
 
Obama's alleged ass kicking at the GOP's retreat is all the Democrats have now. They're heading into a major ass raping in the next election and just like the Republicans were in 2006, the Democrats are in complete denial of what's coming down the road. I thought the possibility of a Republican recapturing of the House was a tall order but I don't think that anymore.
 
The Dems just need to unlock those meeting room doors and let the adults in so they can fix their awful messes. Reid & Pelosi have been monumental failures. I think even most Democrats know this. They wont say it publicly but they know Reid & Pelosi have been a disaster. Time to let the adults fix this giant Democrat debacle. I guess we'll see though. Make 2010 count people.
 
The fact that the Republicans invited him to speak at their retreat shows how much the Republicans are committed to Bi-Partisanship. The Democrats have never invited a Republican President to speak at their similar gatherings. He didn't kick anyone's a*s. He did come off as still being a bit partisan though. Give the Republicans some credit. Just inviting a Democratic President to speak at their retreat was a bold move. Now this President needs to start scolding his fellow Democrats on their petty partisan behavior. Unlock those meeting room doors and maybe something can get done.
Yes, they have.

Bush on Charm Offensive at Democratic Retreat - ABC News

Pretty sure he didn't take questions though.

Yes...Bush continually tried to work with Democrats.

It took Obama a year to finally submit himself to their questions.

Another thing I noticed from your link was this:

What is a Republican president doing meeting behind closed doors with 50 Democratic senators? It's only the latest maneuver in George W. Bush's "charm offensive."

This morning, Bush became the first president to attend a private policy retreat of the opposing party, mingling for half an hour with Senate Democrats as they gathered at the Library of Congress for their ritual strategy session.

‘Boy, He's Really Good’

One Democratic source present at the meeting described Bush as "charming" and "funny" as he shook hands and engaged in lighthearted banter with the group. In brief remarks, Bush said he "loved" being president and was "honored" to have been elected, conceding that he did not win the contest in a landslide. He also spoke about his close friendship and working relationship as Texas governor with Bob Bullock, the late Democratic lieutenant governor.

"Boy, he's really good," the source said.

Obama was not charming or friendly. He was much more confrontational:

He accused Republicans of portraying his now-stalled healthcare reform effort as a "Bolshevik plot" and telling their constituents he is "doing all kinds of crazy stuff that's going to destroy America."

"I am not an ideologue," Obama insisted to his audience, prompting some murmuring of disagreement in the crowd. "I'm not."

Assailing Republicans for trying to obstruct him on everything from economic stimulus to healthcare, Obama suggested their political motive was to score points with voters in the November congressional elections.

"These are serious times and what's required of all of us is to do what's right for our country, even if it's not best for our politics," Obama said.
The event was the annual retreat of Republican members of the House of Representatives. They tried Obama's patience on a number of occasions by asking questions that were basically statements of their beliefs.

An example came from Representative Jeb Hensarling, who asked: "Will that new budget, like your old budget, triple the national debt and continue to take us down the path of increasing the cost of government to almost 25 percent of our economy? That's the question, Mr. President."

Obama complained that "the whole question was structured as a talking point for running a campaign."
Taking on his opponents, Obama did not mince words.

He slammed blanket Republican opposition to a $787 billion economic stimulus plan passed by the Democratic-led Congress last year, saying despite that opposition, some Republican lawmakers appeared at ribbon-cutting ceremonies for projects in their districts funded by the program.

And he insisted that Friday's government report of 5.7 percent economic growth for the fourth quarter showed his efforts to jump-start the economy were working.

While acknowledging double-digit unemployment could not be tolerated, Obama also reminded the lawmakers of the high joblessness and huge budget deficit he had inherited from his Republican predecessor, George W. Bush.
The president, known for his "No-drama Obama" demeanor, grew testier as the session wore on.

When Georgia congressman Tom Price charged that Obama had repeatedly accused Republicans of offering "no ideas and no solutions," Obama shot back, "I don't think I said that."
Obama, Republicans clash in unusual session | Reuters

Some seem to think that Obama's rudeness and testiness showed he was winning the argument. He was not.

He simply showed he didn't like the way they were addressing him. Quite different from the way Bush came across to Democrats years earlier.
 
If the Republicans do have the momentum and votes to take all three powers (as you so lie) then what are they going to do? Nothing.
 
I'm not buying it, when the Dems had the super majority it was " we won, get over it". Now they don't have the super majority and it's " hey, lets work together !".

Hell, they couldn't get their holy grail legislation passed within their own party without hundreds of millions in bribes..........
 
Yea you sure did hear a whole lot of that "We Won now get over it!!" stuff huh? Can't forget all their "Conservatism is Dead!!" and "The Republican Party is Dead" stuff either. Oh such hubris. Make 2010 count people!
 
Yea you sure did hear a whole lot of that "We Won now get over it!!" stuff huh? Can't forget all their "Conservatism is Dead!!" and "The Republican Party is Dead" stuff either. Oh such hubris. Make 2010 count people!

voting for any mainstream republican isnt going to fix anything
 
voting for any mainstream republican isnt going to fix anything

As a Libertarian, I disagree. Obviously, the most optimal progress would be to elect people who are of neither the R nor D party, but since I'm realistic enough to know that the American people are too much of a herd of sheep to look beyond that party duopoly, restoring a balance in Congress between the two parties is the best option right now. The Democrats have too much of a majority and we've seen what happens when too much power is granted to one party.
 
Did anyone notice the audacity of his answer about tort reform? He said it'd save $5B and then went on to say it was not enough. He just dismissed it out of hand. A splendid display of his status as an idealogue. I did not appreciate any of his answers on the issue of health care.

His answer to the budget query towards the end was just another trip down 'let's blame Bush and the Republicans' lane, ignoring the fact that the Dems have been in charge for 3+ years. Sorry, there is no excuse for all this continued runaway spending. But of course, our esteemed, dear POTUS does not see it that way.
 
Last edited:
Did anyone notice the audacity of his answer about tort reform? He said it'd save $5B and then went on to say it was not enough. He just dismissed it out of hand. A splendid display of his status as an idealogue. I did not appreciate any of his answers on the issue of health care.

His answer to the budget query towards the end was just another trip down 'let's blame Bush and the Republicans' lane, ignoring the fact that the Dems have been in charge for 3+ years. Sorry, there is no excuse for all this continued runaway spending. But of course, our esteemed, dear POTUS does not see it that way.

He's a Marxist Ideologue, what did you expect him to do and say?

Let's have a party at the ground breaking for Obama's promised nuclear reactor.
 
Here's one irrefutable way to show who did well and who didn't in this Q and A. MSNBC is giving it more coverage than Foxnews, in fact MSNBC has been doing the last hour on it.

Foxnews is all but burying it. If the president hadn't kicked ass, Foxnews would be running it in an all day production.

FoxNews isn't spinning it like MSLSD.

We expect partisan hackery from MSLSD. They take this non-event and try to spin it into a big "victory" for the President.

FoxNews, being much more objective and much more honest, sees that it's largely a non-news story and moved on.

Just like the Okeefe story?

Here is a hint, if fox wont report on it, IT SCREAMS A VICTORY FOR THE LEFT.

The O'Keefe story is overblown. Yes.

You decline to see this fact, however, because you are merely a shrill partisan hack with less than zero credibility.

In reality, what O'Keefe did (even as per his account) was probably a crime on some level. It appears not to have been the "felony" originally claimed, however. He might have to eat a misdemeanor.

What he did was thus not just criminal (misdemeanor level, but still criminal), it was also rather stupid.

So much for that insipid comparison.

By contrast, the President's meeting with the GOP reps was pretty much a non-event if the partisan hype gets brushed aside. He handled himself ok. Just ok. Nevertheless, good for him. So did the GOP reps handle their part of the show in an "ok" fashion. Another non news story, upon inspection, except to breathless liberal partisan hacks, like MSLSD.
 
“The whole thing basically went like [this],” Mike Madden wrote at Salon. “Republican asks obnoxious question rooted in Glenn Beck-ian talking points; Obama swats it away, makes the questioner look silly, and then smiles at the end. It got so bad, in fact, that Fox News cut away from the event before it was over.”

Obama in the Republican lions? den: Obama 2, lions 1 / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

Pure partisan bullshit.

No wonder you embrace it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top