ReillyT
Senior Member
the answer being "not enough to justify letting others die after a ban of the JOL."
That is a good answer, but I think that is the crux of what he is getting at when he points out the rarity of self-defense through gun ownership. In the cost-benefit analysis (which you may disagree with to begin with) of gun ownership, if the number of instances of self-defense are outweighed 100 times (or 1,000 or 10,000) by instances of murder by guns, then either the threat of murder by home break-in (since most people keep their guns at home) is small or the possession of guns does little to protect even those who have them.